What does the story of the wild landowner teach us? What does the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” teach? What does a fairy tale teach?

Saltykov-Shchedrin contains deep wisdom, so the reader finds all his works surprisingly interesting and instructive. Saltykov-Shchedrin make us smile, because their stories are very funny, bio humor is not the main thing in them. The main goal of the author is to show the injustice of the structure of the world and society; suggest to a person the answer to one or another topical question. And the reader continues to reread the tales of this author, marveling at their relevance to this day. “The Tale of How One Man Fed Two Generals” will probably be remembered by everyone who read it at least once in their lives. Any schoolchild or adult will easily remember its plot. The generals who found themselves on the island almost died of starvation. And their savior turned out to be the most ordinary peasant man. What is the deep wisdom of a fairy tale?

The generals in this case personify the ruling class, which has money and power. A peasant is a people who, with their labor, sweat and blood, makes the existence of the “powers of this world” prosperous and comfortable. But isn’t society monstrously unfair when completely useless “generals” enjoy the fruits of other people’s labor? And the “man” works tirelessly, and receives absolutely no gratitude.

The “generals” take his efforts for granted. Saltykov-Shchedrin paints such vivid pictures in fairy tales that the reader is left with absolutely no doubts about whose side he is on. with caustic satire he ridicules the vices of the ruling class, showing the true face of its representatives, striking in its wretchedness and stupidity. For example, the fairy tale “landowner” tells how one landowner decided to get rid of ordinary people and thanks to this make his own happy. God fulfilled his prayers and removed the men from the estate.

What has the life of this landowner become? Gradually, complete desolation occurred in his estate and estate, and he himself became wild in the literal sense. This fairy tale again All rights reserved and protected by law © 2001-2005 olsoch. Ru makes us think about how great the role of ordinary people is in the achievements of civilization. The ruling class, with titles and money, turns out to be completely helpless in resolving the simplest issues.

The author, with caustic irony, ridicules the arrogance and high opinion of the “generals” and “landowners” about themselves. They are sure that the world was created only for them and that ordinary people exist only to fulfill their whims. But as soon as, by the will of fate, they lose their assistants, representatives of the ruling class instantly degrade, as happened with the “generals”, when on the island they almost ate each other from hunger, or with the “wild landowner”, who, without proper supervision and care, turned into wild and ugly creature. In Saltykov-Shchedrin's fairy tales, animals, fish, and birds often act. But the reader clearly sees in them human traits, desires, habits.

And it’s so easy to draw an analogy between the wise minnow and people who spend their entire lives hiding from difficulties, not noticing that they are thereby depriving their existence of meaning, making it empty and themselves unhappy.

What does the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” teach?

The fairy tale teaches people not to be stupid

The landowner was stupid, the men did not please him in some way

In addition, at some point he stopped washing himself and became wild

So you need to maintain hygiene

Well, don’t do all sorts of stupid things - otherwise you’ll be called a fool.

The fairy tale is a little strange, but all fairy tales used to be like that.

It is worth noting that this fairy tale reflects modernity precisely in the fact that many people try to live at the expense of others, like this landowner, but at the same time trample these others into the dirt. And when people who think about themselves are left alone, then they become wild, because those people at whose expense they lived are no longer around. In my opinion, this fairy tale teaches that we must treat people with respect and mercy, because we all depend to some extent on each other. In any situation you need to remain human.

A special place in the work of Saltykov-Shchedrin is occupied by fairy tales with their allegorical images, in which the author was able to say more about Russian society in the 60-80s of the 19th century than the historians of those years. Saltykov-Shchedrin writes these fairy tales for children of a fair age, that is, for an adult reader whose mind is in the state of a child who needs to open his eyes to life. The fairy tale, due to the simplicity of its form, is accessible to anyone, even an inexperienced reader, and therefore is especially dangerous for those who are ridiculed in it.

The main problem of Shchedrin's fairy tales is the relationship between the exploiters and the exploited. The writer created a satire on Tsarist Russia. The reader is presented with images of rulers (Bear in the Voivodeship, Eagle the Patron), exploiters and exploited (Wild Landowner, The Tale of How One Man Fed Two Generals), and ordinary people (The Wise Minnow, Dried Roach).

The fairy tale The Wild Landowner is directed against the entire social system, based on exploitation, anti-people in its essence. Preserving the spirit and style of a folk tale, the satirist talks about real events in contemporary life. The work begins as an ordinary fairy tale: In a certain kingdom, in a certain state, there lived a landowner. But then an element of modern life appears: and that stupid landowner was reading the newspaper Vest. The news of the newspaper is reactionary-serfdom, so the stupidity of the landowner is determined by his worldview. The landowner considers himself a true representative of the Russian state, its support, and is proud that he is a hereditary Russian nobleman, Prince Urus-Kuchum-Kildibaev. The whole point of his existence comes down to pampering his body, soft, white and crumbly. He lives at the expense of his men, but he hates and is afraid of them, and cannot stand the servile spirit. He rejoices when, by some fantastic whirlwind, all the men were carried away to who knows where, and the air in his domain became pure, pure. But the men disappeared, and such hunger set in that it was impossible to buy anything at the market. And the landowner himself became completely wild: he was all overgrown with hair, from head to toe, and his nails became like iron. He stopped blowing his nose a long time ago and walked more and more on all fours. He even lost the ability to pronounce articulate sounds. In order not to die of hunger, when the last gingerbread was eaten, the Russian nobleman began to hunt: he would spot a hare as if an arrow would jump from a tree, grab onto his prey, tear it apart with his nails, and eat it with all the entrails, even the skin. The landowner's savagery indicates that he cannot live without the help of a peasant. It was not without reason that as soon as the swarm of men was caught and put in place, flour, meat, and all kinds of living creatures appeared at the market.

The stupidity of the landowner is constantly emphasized by the writer. The first to call the landowner stupid were the peasants themselves; representatives of other classes called the landowner stupid three times (triple repetition technique): the actor Sadovsky (However, brother, you are a stupid landowner! Who gives you a wash, stupid?) generals, whom he treated instead of beef printed gingerbread cookies and candies (However, brother, you are a stupid landowner!) and, finally, a police captain (You are stupid, Mr. Landowner!). The stupidity of the landowner is visible to everyone, and he indulges in unrealistic dreams that he will achieve prosperity in the economy without the help of the peasants, and thinks about English machines that will replace the serfs. His dreams are absurd, because he cannot do anything on his own. And only one day the landowner thought: Is he really a fool? Could it be that the inflexibility that he so cherished in his soul, when translated into ordinary language, means only stupidity and madness? If we compare the well-known folk tales about the master and the peasant with the tales of Saltykov-Shchedrin, for example with the Wild Landowner, we will see that the image of the landowner in Shchedrin’s fairy tales is very close to folklore, and the peasants, on the contrary, differ from those in fairy tales. In folk tales, a quick-witted, dexterous, resourceful man defeats a stupid master. And in the Wild Landowner, a collective image of workers, breadwinners of the country and, at the same time, patient martyrs and sufferers appears. Thus, modifying a folk tale, the writer condemns the people's long-suffering, and his tales sound like a call to rise up to fight, to renounce the slave worldview.

Well, in short, the fairy tale teaches that the state cannot exist without the common people. And if it’s long, then I agree with jkhnjkh6457.

Meanwhile, although the police captain patronized the landowners, in view of such a fact as the disappearance of the peasant from the face of the earth, he did not dare to remain silent. The provincial authorities were also alarmed by his report and wrote to him: Who do you think will pay taxes now? Who will drink wine in taverns? Who will engage in innocent activities? The captain-police officer answers: the treasury should now be abolished, but innocent occupations were abolished by themselves, and instead of them, robberies, robbery and murders spread in the district. The other day, even he, the police officer, was almost killed by some kind of bear, not a bear, not a man, and he suspects that same stupid landowner who is the instigator of all the troubles is the bear-man.

The bosses became concerned and convened a council. They decided to catch the peasant and install him, and to instill in the most delicate manner the stupid landowner, who is the instigator of all the troubles, so that he stops his fanfare and does not interfere with the flow of taxes to the treasury.

As if on purpose, at that time a swarm of men flew through the provincial town and showered the entire market square. Now this grace has been taken away, put in a whip and sent to the district.

And suddenly there was again a smell of chaff and sheepskins in that district; but at the same time, flour, meat, and all kinds of livestock appeared at the market, and so many taxes arrived in one day that the treasurer, seeing such a pile of money, just clasped his hands in surprise and cried out:

• And where do you scoundrels get it from!!

• The tale of the Wild Landowner Saltykov - Shchedrin is very relevant today.

  The landowner hated the peasants. But, left without his serf Senka, he began to run wild.

  Don't neglect those who feed.

  In his fairy tales, Saltykov-Shchedrin is very sympathetic to the people, but at the same time, he condemns them for their patience.

  It was not for nothing that Saltykov-Shchedrin took place in Soviet times. He ridiculed rich, stupid officials and sympathized with the peasants. In his fairy tales, the simple man is always smarter than the master. In the fairy tale The Wild Landowner, everything is the same. Landowners are condemned. Sympathizes with the long-suffering peasants. Condemns them for their patience. I didn’t think that they were still studying the work of this writer. I have nothing against him, of course, but it’s all somehow one-sided)

  Saltykov-Shchedrin Wild landowner. The work teaches you to be human, whether you are above on a throne or crawling below like a worm. Everyone should have human dignity and man should be equal to man, although the position, of course, may be different.

  Saltykov-Shchedrin (pseudonym - N. Shchedrin) was a favorite writer of Soviet times. A monument was erected to him in Tver. He ridiculed the landowners and their unlimited power over the peasants. He himself was from a wealthy family. He was a vice-governor. His fairy tales were the voice of that time, when it was already clear that without the liberation of the peasants from the landowners, it is necessary for the prosperity of Russia. You can probably still find such landowners both in state-owned enterprises and among private owners. The attitude towards workers and peasants probably hasn’t changed much. You can just slam the door now and go to another place of work. But in the time of Saltykov you cannot escape the tyrant landowner.

  M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin did not at all idealize the peasants, as one of the previous speakers claims. Take, for example, the fairy tale about two well-fed generals, in which the man himself tied a rope so that he would be tied up (in case he decides to run away).

  When, during the last global crisis, not only proletarians, but also management began to lose their jobs, how many cries rang through the media. Guard, the light has converged like a wedge. They couldn’t even imagine that they would always cut a guy’s salary, force him to work more, fire half of them - and they would continue to receive insanely huge salaries and bonuses for unknown reasons.

  This suggests that those in power (whether they have it: in parliament, in a specific company or in the fairy tale in question) really think that their orders generate material values, like magic spells, and the common people who create these values ​​only prevents them from living, because they have no idea what and how in this world done.

  Fairy tale by M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, entitled The Wild Landowner, teaches, first of all, not to spit in a well from which you will have to drink. The landowner, who is the main character of the work, was not wild at first, but only very stupid, because he decided that the peasant in his domain did much more harm than good. Therefore, he decided to kill the peasant, but at the same time he was completely unadapted to life, to such an extent that he could not even prepare food for himself. So gradually he became wild, because he stopped looking after himself, began to walk on all fours and hunt, as wild animals do. That is, having thoughtlessly exterminated a man, he himself found himself on the verge of death. Stupidity is the biggest misfortune, which, if it begins at birth, does not leave a person throughout his life. And the price of mistakes made under its influence can be very, very high.

Saltykov-Shchedrin wrote more than 30 fairy tales. Turning to this genre was natural for Saltykov-Shchedrin. Fairy-tale elements (fantasy, hyperbole, convention, etc.) permeate all of his work. The most famous in Saltykov-Shchedrin's literary heritage were fairy tales, the first three were written in 1869, the writer wrote the rest of the fairy tales (23 more) since 1883 for three years.

Themes of Shchedrin's fairy tales: despotic power (“The Bear in the Voivodeship”), masters and slaves (“The Tale of How One Man Fed Two Generals,” “The Wild Landowner”), fear as the basis of slave psychology (“The Wise Minnow”), convict labor (“Horse”), etc. The unifying thematic principle of all fairy tales is the life of the people in its correlation with the life of the ruling classes.

The tales of Saltykov-Shchedrin open a new literary genre in Russian literature: socio-political satire, written in the form of an allegory based on the artistic principles of fairy tales about animals and fables. For all its dramatic coloring, for all its palpable tragic subtext, Saltykov-Shchedrin’s “Fairy Tales” are based on the comic, on a violation of proportion. Sarcasm becomes the leading form of Shchedrin's comedic-aesthetic attitude to reality. But this feature does not exclude, but rather presupposes the satirist’s varied shades and transitions of laughter from bitter jokes and sad humor to irony and angry denunciation.

In a world of general chaos and absurdity, as the writer shows, absurdity reigns. That is why Shchedrin so often introduces comedy, misunderstandings and alogisms into fairy tales, showing the dominance of chance and incidents, whims, whims and whims. The author enriches the satirical text with irony, which outwardly asserts what it actually asserts. Shchedrin also uses humorous techniques, implementing that type of humor that is associated with the comedy of unfulfilled expectation or surprise.

What brings Saltykov-Shchedrin’s fairy tales closer to folk tales? Typical fairy tale openings (“Once upon a time there were two generals...”, “In a certain kingdom, in a certain state, there lived a landowner...”; sayings (“at the command of a pike,” “neither to say in a fairy tale, nor to describe with a pen.” ); phrases characteristic of folk speech (“thought-thought”, “said and done”); syntax, vocabulary, orthoepy close to the people’s language; exaggeration, grotesque, hyperbole: one of the generals eats the other “wild landowner”; , in an instant climbs a tree; a man cooks a handful of soup. As in folk tales, a miraculous incident sets the plot in motion: two generals “suddenly found themselves on a desert island”; by the grace of God, “there was no man in the entire domain of the stupid landowner.” Saltykov-Shchedrin also follows the folk tradition in fairy tales about animals, when in an allegorical form he ridicules the shortcomings of society.

The tales of Saltykov-Shchedrin capture a complete picture of the changes that took place in Russian society in the 1860s - 1880s. Thus, the writer in “The Tale of How One Man Fed Two Generals” (1868-69) with caustic wit depicts an absurd situation based on a fantastic technique, but truthfully reflecting an absurd and blatant reality. Two retired generals are miraculously transported to a desert island while sleeping. The island abounds in fruits, birds, and living creatures, but the generals are starving because they know nothing about life and do not know how to do anything. Their knowledge is limited to the belief that “the rolls will be born in the same form as they are served with coffee in the morning,” and their skills were expressed in the only phrase they knew, which served as a guide to their service: “Accept the assurances of my complete respect and devotion.” The drone generals are saved from starvation by a jack of all trades, a capable but resigned man. The fairy tale also has a universal meaning. At all times, arrogant, ignorant lazy people, unfortunately, achieve social success at the expense of weak-willed, submissive, silent workers.

“The Wise Minnow” is the image of a frightened man in the street who “everything

He only saves his hateful life.” Can there be a meaning in life for a person?

slogan - “survive and the pike won’t get hit”? The theme of the tale is related to the defeat of the people

Voltsev, when many representatives of the intelligentsia, frightened, moved away from public

business affairs. A type of coward, pathetic, and unhappy is being created. These people did no harm to anyone, but lived their lives aimlessly, without impulses. The main thing for such a person is to survive, to exist, as if he were seaweed or a stone. This life is meaningless, and its outcome is disastrous: the minnow simply disappears, as if it had never existed. This tale is about a person’s civic position and the meaning of human life in general. The author appears in a fairy tale in two faces at once: a folk storyteller, a simpleton joker and at the same time a person wise with life experience, a writer, a thinker, a citizen.

In the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner,” the hero gradually degrades, turning into an animal. The incredible story of the hero is largely explained by the fact that he read the newspaper "Vest" and

However, while portraying the people, Saltykov-Shchedrin sympathizes with them and at the same time condemns them for their patience and resignation. He likens it to a “swarm” of industrious bees living an unconscious gregarious life. “...They raised a chaff whirlwind, and a swarm of men was swept away from the estate.”

A special place in the work of Saltykov-Shchedrin is occupied by fairy tales with their allegorical images, in which the author was able to say more about Russian society of the 60-80s of the 19th century than the historians of those years. Saltykov-Shchedrin writes these fairy tales “for children of a fair age,” that is, for an adult reader whose mind is in the state of a child who needs to open his eyes to life. The fairy tale, due to the simplicity of its form, is accessible to anyone, even an inexperienced reader, and therefore is especially dangerous for those who are ridiculed in it.
The main problem of Shchedrin's fairy tales is the relationship between the exploiters and the exploited. The writer created a satire on Tsarist Russia. The reader is presented with images of rulers (“Bear in the Voivodeship”, “Eagle Patron”), exploiters and exploited (“Wild Landowner”, “The Tale of How One Man Fed Two Generals”), ordinary people (“The Wise Minnow”, “ Dried roach").
The fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” is directed against the entire social system, based on exploitation, anti-people in its essence. Preserving the spirit and style of a folk tale, the satirist talks about real events in contemporary life. The work begins as an ordinary fairy tale: “In a certain kingdom, in a certain state, there lived a landowner...” But then an element of modern life appears: “and that stupid landowner was reading the newspaper “Vest”.” “Vest” is a reactionary-serf newspaper, so the stupidity of the landowner is determined by his worldview. The landowner considers himself a true representative of the Russian state, its support, and is proud that he is a hereditary Russian nobleman, Prince Urus-Kuchum-Kildibaev. The whole meaning of his existence comes down to pampering his body, “soft, white and crumbly.” He lives at the expense of his men, but he hates and is afraid of them, and cannot stand the “servile spirit.” He rejoices when, by some fantastic whirlwind, all the men were carried away to who knows where, and the air in his domain became pure, pure. But the men disappeared, and such hunger set in that it was impossible to buy anything at the market. And the landowner himself went completely wild: “He was all overgrown with hair, from head to toe... and his nails became like iron. He stopped blowing his nose a long time ago and walked more and more on all fours. I’ve even lost the ability to pronounce articulate sounds...” In order not to die of hunger, when the last gingerbread was eaten, the Russian nobleman began to hunt: if he spots a hare, “like an arrow will jump from a tree, grab onto its prey, tear it apart with its nails, and eat it with all the insides, even the skin.” The landowner's savagery indicates that he cannot live without the help of a peasant. After all, it was not for nothing that as soon as the “swarm of men” was caught and put in place, “flour, meat, and all kinds of living creatures appeared at the market.”
The stupidity of the landowner is constantly emphasized by the writer. The first to call the landowner stupid were the peasants themselves; representatives of other classes called the landowner stupid three times (a technique of threefold repetition): the actor Sadovsky (“However, brother, you are a stupid landowner! Who gives you a wash, stupid?”) generals, whom he instead of “beef -ki” treated him to printed gingerbread and candy (“However, brother, you are a stupid landowner!”) and, finally, the police captain (“You are stupid, Mr. Landowner!”).

) the generals, whom he treated instead of “beef” to printed gingerbread and candy (“However, brother, you are a stupid landowner!”) and, finally, the police captain (“You are stupid, Mr. Landowner!”). The stupidity of the landowner is visible to everyone, and he indulges in unrealistic dreams that he will achieve prosperity in the economy without the help of the peasants, and thinks about English machines that will replace the serfs. His dreams are absurd, because he cannot do anything on his own. And only one day the landowner thought: “Is he really a fool? Could it be that the inflexibility that he so cherished in his soul, when translated into ordinary language, means only stupidity and madness?” If we compare the well-known folk tales about the master and the peasant with the tales of Saltykov-Shchedrin, for example, with “The Wild Landowner,” we will see that the image of the landowner in Shchedrin’s fairy tales is very close to folklore, and the peasants, on the contrary, differ from those in fairy tales. In folk tales, a quick-witted, dexterous, resourceful man defeats a stupid master. And in “The Wild Landowner” a collective image of workers, breadwinners of the country and, at the same time, patient martyrs and sufferers appears. Thus, modifying a folk tale, the writer condemns the people's long-suffering, and his tales sound like a call to rise up to fight, to renounce the slave worldview.