But are the people happy? The people are liberated, but are the people happy? “The people are liberated, but are the people happy?”

Composition.

“The people are liberated, but are the people happy?”

Nekrasov’s poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” was, as it were, a departure from the general idea of many works of that time - the revolution. In addition, in almost all works the main characters were representatives of the upper classes - the nobility, merchants, and philistines. In the poem, the main characters are former serfs who became free after the decree of 1861. And the main idea of the novel was to search for happy people in Russia. The seven men, the main characters of the poem, put forward different hypotheses about the happiest person in Russia, and these were, as a rule, rich people who were obliged to be happy - merchants, nobles, landowners, boyars, the tsar. But the men went to the people to look for happiness. And the people are those same newly liberated peasants. Peasants are the poorest and most powerless class, and it is more than strange to look for a happy one among them. But there is happiness among the peasants, but at the same time they have much more misfortunes. The peasants are happy, of course, with their freedom, which they received for the first time in hundreds of years. Happy for various reasons: some are happy with an unusually large harvest, others with their great physical strength, others with a successful, non-drinking family. But nevertheless, it is difficult to call the peasants happy, even a little bit. Because with their release they had a lot of their own problems. And the happiness of peasants is usually very local and temporary.

And now, in order... The peasants are freed. This is a happiness that they have not seen for hundreds of years, and perhaps that they have never seen at all. Happiness itself came quite unexpectedly; many were not ready for it and, once released, they were birds raised in a cage and then released into the wild. As a result, the new class of temporarily obliged, freed peasants became the poorest. The landowners did not want to inflate their land, and almost all peasant land belonged either to the landowners or to the community. The peasants did not free, they only acquired a new kind of dependence on themselves. Of course, this dependence is not the same as serfdom, but it was dependence on the landowner, on the community, on the state. It is very difficult to call this complete freedom or happiness. But the Russian people, accustomed to everything, could find happy moments here too. For a Russian man, the greatest happiness is vodka. If there is a lot of it, then the man becomes very happy. For Russian women, happiness is a good harvest, a clean house, a fed family. This happened quite rarely, so women were less happy than men. The peasant children were also not very happy. They were forced to work for an adult, but at the same time eat for a child, run for vodka, they constantly received from drunken parents and, growing up, became one themselves. But there were individuals who considered themselves happy - people who rejoiced at what an ordinary person might find disgusting or incomprehensible. One rejoiced that his landowner had a “favorite slave.” He and his retinue drank the best overseas wines, ate the best dishes and suffered from the “royal” disease - gout. He was happy in his own way and his happiness should be respected, but ordinary men didn’t like it very much. Others were happy about at least some kind of harvest that could feed them. And this was truly happiness for those peasants who were not at all happy, they were so poor. But this was not the kind of happiness the seven wanderers were looking for. They were looking for true, complete happiness, and therefore one in which nothing else was needed. But such happiness cannot be found. This doesn’t even talk about peasants; the upper classes always have their own problems too. The landowners cannot possibly be happy because their time has passed. Serfdom was abolished and the landowners at the same time lost the enormous influence of their class, which means that Nkha did not have any happiness in her life. But these are landowners, and we were talking about peasants...

Tags: “The people are liberated, but are the people happy?” based on Nekrasov's poem "Who Lives Well in Rus'" Essay Anti-crisis management

And now, in order... The peasants are freed. This is a happiness that they have not seen for hundreds of years, and perhaps that they have never seen at all. Happiness itself came quite unexpectedly; many were not ready for it and, once released, they were birds raised in a cage and then released into the wild. As a result, the new class of temporarily obliged, freed peasants became the poorest. The landowners did not want to inflate their land, and almost all peasant land belonged either to the landowners or to the community. The peasants did not become free, they only acquired a new kind of dependence on themselves. Of course, this dependence is not the same as serfdom, but it was dependence on the landowner, on the community, on the state. It is very difficult to call this complete freedom or happiness. But the Russian people, accustomed to everything, could find happy moments here too. For a Russian man, the greatest happiness is vodka. If there is a lot of it, then the man becomes very happy. For Russian women, happiness is a good harvest, a clean house, a fed family. This happened quite rarely, so women were less happy than men. The peasant children were also not very happy. They were forced to work for an adult, but at the same time eat for a child, run for vodka, they constantly received from drunken parents and, growing up, became one themselves. But there were individuals who considered themselves happy - people who rejoiced at what an ordinary person might find disgusting or incomprehensible. One rejoiced that his landowner had a “favorite slave.” He and his retinue drank the best overseas wines, ate the best dishes and suffered from the “royal” disease - gout. He was happy in his own way and his happiness should be respected, but ordinary men didn’t like it very much. Others were happy about at least some kind of harvest that could feed them. And this was truly happiness for those peasants who were not at all happy, they were so poor. But this was not the kind of happiness the seven wanderers were looking for. They were looking for true, complete happiness, and therefore one in which nothing else was needed. But such happiness cannot be found. This doesn’t even talk about peasants; the upper classes always have their own problems too. The landowners cannot possibly be happy because their time has passed. Serfdom was abolished and the landowners at the same time lost the enormous influence of their class, which means that Nkha did not have any happiness in her life. But these are landowners, and we were talking about peasants...

Nekrasov’s poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” was, as it were, a departure from the general idea of many works of that time - revolution. In addition, in almost all works the main characters were representatives of the upper classes - the nobility, merchants, and philistines. In the poem, the main characters are former serfs who became free after the decree of 1861.

And the main idea of the novel was to find happy people in Russia. The seven men, the main characters of the poem, put forward different hypotheses about the happiest person in Russia, and these were, as a rule, rich people who were obliged to be happy - merchants, nobles, landowners, boyars, the tsar. But the men went to the people to look for happiness. And the people are those same newly liberated peasants. The peasants are the poorest and most powerless class, and it is more than strange to look for a happy one among them. But there is happiness among the peasants, but at the same time they have much more misfortunes. The peasants are happy, of course, with their freedom, which they received for the first time in hundreds of years. Happy for various reasons: some are happy with an unusually large harvest, others with their great physical strength, others with a successful, non-drinking family. But nevertheless, it is difficult to call the peasants happy, even just a little bit. Because with their release they had a lot of their own problems. And the happiness of peasants is usually very local and temporary.

And now, in order, the peasants have been freed. This is a happiness that they have not seen for hundreds of years, and perhaps that they have never seen at all. Happiness itself came quite unexpectedly; many were not ready for it and, once released, they were birds raised in a cage and then released into the wild. As a result, the new class - temporarily obliged, freed peasants - became the poorest. The landowners did not want to inflate their land, and almost all peasant land belonged either to the landowners or to the community. The peasants did not become free, they only acquired a new form... dependence on themselves. Of course, this dependence is not the same as serfdom, but it was dependence on the landowner, on the community, on the state. It is very difficult to call this complete freedom or happiness. But the Russian people, accustomed to everything, could find happy moments here too.

For a Russian peasant, the greatest happiness is vodka. If there is a lot of it, then the man becomes very happy. For Russian women, happiness is a good harvest, a clean house, a fed family. This happened quite rarely, so women were less happy than men. The peasant children were also not very happy. They were forced to work for an adult, but at the same time eat for a child, run for vodka, they constantly received from drunken parents and, growing up, became one themselves. But there were individuals who considered themselves happy - people who rejoiced at what an ordinary person might find disgusting or incomprehensible. One rejoiced that his landowner had a “favorite slave.” He and his retinue drank the best overseas wines, ate the best dishes and suffered from the “royal” disease - gout. He was happy in his own way and his happiness should be respected, but ordinary men didn’t like it very much. Others were happy about at least some kind of harvest that could feed them. And this was truly happiness for those peasants who were not at all happy, they were so poor. But this was not the kind of happiness the seven wanderers were looking for. They were looking for true, complete happiness, and therefore one in which nothing else was needed.

But such happiness cannot be found. This doesn’t even talk about peasants; the upper classes always have their own problems too. The landowners cannot possibly be happy because their time has passed. Serfdom was abolished and the landowners at the same time lost the enormous influence of their class, which means that Nkha did not have any happiness in her life. But these are landowners, and we were talking about peasants.

Nekrasov’s poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” was, as it were, a deviation from the general idea of many works of that time - revolution. In addition, in almost all works the main characters were representatives of the upper classes - the nobility, merchants, and philistines. In the poem, the main characters are former serfs who became free after the decree of 1861. And the main idea of the novel was to search for happy people in Russia. Seven men, the main characters of the poem, put forward different hypotheses about the happiest man in Russia, and

These were, as a rule, rich people who were obliged to be happy - merchants, nobles, landowners, boyars, the tsar. But the men went to the people to look for happiness. And the people are those same newly liberated peasants. Peasants are the poorest and most powerless class, and it is more than strange to look for a happy one among them. But there is happiness among the peasants, but at the same time they have much more misfortunes. The peasants are happy, of course, with their freedom, which they received for the first time in hundreds of years. Happy for various reasons: some are happy with an unusually large harvest, others with their great physical strength, others with a successful, non-drinking family. But, nevertheless, it is difficult to call the peasants happy, even a little bit. Because with their release they had a lot of their own problems. And the happiness of peasants is usually very local and temporary.
The people are liberated, but are the people happy?
And now, in order. The peasants are freed. This is a happiness that they have not seen for hundreds of years, and perhaps that they have never seen at all. Happiness itself came quite unexpectedly; many were not ready for it and, once released, they were birds raised in a cage and then released into the wild. As a result, the new class - temporarily obliged, freed peasants - became the poorest. The landowners did not want to give away their land, and almost all peasant land belonged either to the landowners or to the community. The peasants did not become free, they only acquired a new type of dependence on themselves. Of course, this dependence is not the same as serfdom, but it was dependence on the landowner, on the community, on the state. It is very difficult to call this complete freedom or happiness. But the Russian people, accustomed to everything, could find happy moments here too. For a Russian man, the greatest happiness is vodka. If there is a lot of it, then the man becomes very happy. For Russian women, happiness is a good harvest, a clean house, a fed family. This happened quite rarely, so women were less happy than men. The peasant children were also not very happy. They were forced to work for an adult, but at the same time eat for a child, run for vodka, they constantly received from drunken parents and, growing up, became one themselves. But there were individuals who considered themselves happy, people who rejoiced in the fact that an ordinary person might be disgusted or incomprehensible. One rejoiced that his landowner had a “favorite slave.” He and his retinue drank the best overseas wines, ate the best dishes and suffered from the “royal” disease - gout. He was happy in his own way and his happiness should be respected, but ordinary men didn’t like it very much. Others were happy to have at least some harvest that could feed them. And this was truly happiness for those peasants who were not at all happy, they were so poor. But this was not the kind of happiness that the seven wanderers were looking for. They were looking for true, complete happiness, and therefore one in which nothing else was needed. But I'm happy to find something like this

(No Ratings Yet)

The poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” is the result of the author’s thoughts about the fate of the country and the people. Who can live well in Rus'? - the poem begins with this question. Its plot is similar to the plot...
Nekrasov’s poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” is usually called an epic poem. An epic is a work of art that depicts with maximum completeness an entire era in the life of a people. At the center of Nekrasov’s work is an image...
Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov is a great Russian poet of the 19th century. The main theme of his work is the people. Nekrasov writes about the fate of the people, about their life, way of life, about the joys and sorrows of the people. So...
N. A. Nekrasov was one of the first to address the topic of the Decembrists. In his poem “Russian Women,” he spoke about the heroic act of the wives of the Decembrists, exiled to Siberia for hard labor. Following their husbands, these...
Many writers have tried to create the type of ideal woman in their works. However, most of the heroines were born from the nobility. N. A. Nekrasov was the first to introduce a new type of heroine into his poems - a simple...
A vivid expression of civil service to the Fatherland is the work of N. A. Nekrasov. Continuing the traditions of Pushkin and Lermontov, Nekrasov throughout his entire career constantly addressed the topic of the poet and poetry. Already in...
Nekrasov began the poem shortly after the liberation of the peasants. Although the peasants did not truly become completely free. They live poorly, even the names of the villages speak about this - Zaplatova, Dyryavina, Razutova, Znobishena, Gorelova,...
Russian literature tends to reflect. One need only remember Lermontov’s “Duma” or Radishchev’s “Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow.” And here we have one more thought. The entrance in question is located on...
Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov is a great Russian poet of the second half of the 19th century. Turning to the topic of Russia, Pushkin and Lermontov saw the greatness of the people, the breadth of Russian lands, but for Nekrasov Russia is...
In 1864, Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov wrote the poem “The Railway” - one of his most dramatic works. In terms of the scale of events, in terms of its spirit, this is a relatively small poem - a real poem...
Each of us has been familiar with Nekrasov’s poems and poems since childhood. He dedicated all his work to the people, their thoughts, dreams, and aspirations. His heartfelt poems are imbued with love for Russia, its nature,...
Grisha Dobrosklonov is a key figure in Nekrasov’s poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'.” Let me tell you a little about him. Grisha was born into the family of a poor clerk, a lazy and mediocre man....
The author used mixed rhyme to create this eighteen-line passage. The lyrical text is written in two-syllable meter and iambic tetrameter, giving it a special rhythmicity and melodiousness. The sound of the passage is reminiscent of oral works...
Nekrasov spent the first post-reform summer, as usual, in Greshnev in the circle of his friends, Yaroslavl and Kostroma peasants] In the fall, he returned to St. Petersburg with a whole “heap of poems.” His friends were interested in the mood...
Nekrasov's lyrics are a new stage in the development of Russian poetry. It reveals the thoughts, feelings, moods, and views of a person of a new social era - a representative of democratic social circles who survived the difficult contradictions of the period of collapse...
In general, speaking about the genre and style of “Who Lives Well in Rus',” we must bear in mind the greater proximity of Nekrasov’s poem in many respects to prose narrative genres than to poems, in...
Nekrasov’s entire poem is a flaring up worldly gathering that is gradually gaining strength. For Nekrasov, it is important that the peasantry not only thought about the meaning of life, but also set out on a difficult and long journey...
The work of N. A. Nekrasov is distinguished by a tender love for the common Russian man and endless sympathy for the forced labor of serfs. This is very clearly reflected in the poem “Railroad”, in which the author tries to show...
Among the various peasant images, the monumental figure of the hundred-year-old Savely, the Holy Russian hero, rises above all. All of Nekrasov’s work is a vivid expression of the heroic traditions of the Russian people, faith in their vast and far...
Every time gives birth to its poet. In the second half of the last century there was no more popular poet than N. A. Nekrasov. He not only sympathized with the people, but identified himself with peasant Russia, shocked...