Full description of silent grief from the mind. Characteristics and image of Molchalin in the comedy Woe from Wit essay. Quote from Molchalin

The work “Woe from Wit” by A.S. Griboyedov belongs to the comedy genre, the events took place at the beginning of the 19th century, in it the author showed images of Moscow nobles. The main theme of the work can be identified as the confrontation between the present century and the past, the difficult change of old ideals to new ones. On the side of the last century there was a significant number of people in comedy, one of them was a young nobleman who did not yet have any ranks of Molchalin. His task was to serve influential people.

Molchalin himself was a poor nobleman, born in Tver. In the comedy, he lived in Famusov’s house, who in turn took Molchalin as his secretary. Molchalin falls in love with Famusov's daughter and secretly meets with her. Famusov is an opponent of such relationships, because he believes that his daughter needs an influential husband with ranks. Although Molchalin does not meet these requirements, he has another quality that was appreciated by the inhabitants of Famusov’s house. He tried his best to serve in every possible way, and this attracted attention. That is why he managed to get the position of secretary, where business qualities are important, not honor.

In the work "Woe from Wit" the image of the protagonist can be called the standard behavior of a young nobleman surrounded by him. We see how he tries to serve, and if necessary, even humiliate himself in front of the influential guests of Famusov’s house, all this goes with the expectation that they can be useful in life and further service. Molchalin even took it for granted to praise the fur of Khlestova’s dog. To describe the hero, a quote is suitable that says that while “we are small in rank,” “we must depend on others.” He believes that while you are young, you don’t have to have your own opinion.

Famus society was famous for its boasting trait; at every opportunity it was common to praise new successes, and Molchalin was the same. He was a frequent guest of Princess Tatyana Yuryevna. Although in character and behavior Molchalin was the same as everyone else in society, although he agreed with everyone and supported ideas, this did not stop him from resorting to meanness. For example, his love for Sophia was only a fiction and he did it for his own benefit. In fact, he opens up sincerely when communicating with the maid Lisa, whom he liked. And then another character is revealed to the reader, you see that there is duplicity in him, which means such a person is dangerous.

There is not a drop of respect or warmth in his soul and heart for Sophia. He takes a great risk when he begins to secretly see Famusov’s daughter, because he was constantly in a state of fear that they would be noticed. This expresses cowardice. For Molchalin, an important role was played by the fact that he was worried about the opinions of others, and he was also afraid of what others would think of him. This meanness and deceit of his destroys him, because he begins to harm those with whom he has been surrounded for a long time. He remembered the words of his father, which said to please everyone without exception, which Molchalin followed. Based on this, we can draw a conclusion about the hero’s attitude towards the description of the ideal of the last century, despite the fact that he is still young.

The author showed Molchalin as a worthy continuation and example of conservative nobles. Such a society is characterized by the fact that for them rank and money come first; these two categories allow them to evaluate others. As already mentioned, Molchalin was cunning and two-faced, these are the two main qualities that describe the hero.

Griboyedov touched upon a problem in his comedy that is still relevant today. After all, many cases are known when there were the same people who did not see anything in their way and were ready to go through everything for the sake of their goals. This topic will be relevant as long as there are people among us with the same values ​​as Molchalin and his society.

Essay on the topic Molchalin

The comedy “Woe from Wit,” written by Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov from 1822 to 1824, tells the story of secular society and life of those times. One of the central characters of the work is Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin, a man from the common people, striving for career growth.

Molchalin seems to be a decent young man, distinguished by his kindness and modesty. But in fact, all these qualities are just a mask that the hero uses to achieve his goals. His dream is a career, high rank and wealth. Respect among high society is the limit of his happiness. There are many different ways to achieve these goals. But Molchalin chooses the fastest and most negative one. He takes steps towards his dream with the help of flattery, hypocrisy and duplicity. He does it so subtly and imperceptibly that many may envy.

The hero worked as a secretary for Famusov, a rich and respected man. He did all the work conscientiously, spoke kindly and carefully, which is why Famusov liked him. He treated his master's daughter, Sophia, even better and even dared to play a young man in love. Naturally, he does not experience any high feelings towards the girl. On the contrary, he despises her and establishes relationships solely for his own benefit. Once, having offended a girl, he throws himself at her feet. The reason for this was far from repentance, but the fear of losing the trust of his master Famusov. Another person who was lucky enough to hear lies from Molchalin was Khlestova. He kindly played cards with her and complimented her dog. In fact, people are very pleased with such behavior towards them. Molchalin showed hypocrisy and helpfulness towards everyone living in the house: from servants to management. This was the hero's plan, which he strictly adhered to.

Thus, Molchalin in Griboedov’s comedy is a negative character. The reader cannot see any positive traits of the hero, but sees only hypocrisy and the desire to achieve a dubious goal through dirty means. With the help of this character, the author reveals a serious problem that still exists today. People who do not strive for anything high, but for fame and money, are ready to go over their heads and put on a mask of sincerity. Usually, having achieved their goals, such people live unhappy and lonely.

Option 3

In his comedy "Woe from Wit" Griboyedov talks about the nobles of Moscow in the 19th century, it was then that society split into conservatives and those who were impressed by the ideas of the Decembrists. The main idea of ​​the work is the contrast between the present century and the past century, the replacement of outdated ideals of the nobles with completely new ones.

There are a huge number of supporters of old ideals in comedy. Admirers of the old principles are weighty and significant people in society, such as the landowner Famusov, Colonel Skalozub, and the younger generation, who are simply forced to serve the “old men,” also serve the old nobles. Molchalin is one of these young people who is forced to serve the old nobles with their orders.

Molchalin himself is a poor nobleman, born in Tver, he lives in the house of Famusov, who gave him the rank of assistant and hired him as a secretary. Molchalin is also the lover of Famusov’s daughter, but Famusov himself does not know about this. The father does not want to have a son-in-law like Molchalin, because in Moscow it is customary to have rich relatives. Famusov appreciates in people the desire to serve him, and this is how Molchalin, with the help of his helpfulness, receives such positions.

In this play, the image of Molchalin very accurately corresponds to the nature of the command of a young, fragile nobleman in an influential society. Molchalin tries to curry favor with distinguished guests in Famusov’s house as much as possible, because they can be useful for his further career growth. The young nobleman has sunk to the point where he begins to praise the fur of Khlestova’s dog. He believes that lower-ranking nobles should thus earn respect from their elders.

He, like all the characters in this comedy, considers it his duty to brag and be proud of his successes in career advancement. Molchalin is excellent at establishing connections with the people he needs, who can help him in his career. Molchalin brings enormous damage to the society in which he is located. He also deceives Famusov’s daughter, because he is courting her only for the sake of service to her father. He is the kind of person who will stop at nothing to achieve his goal, and is capable of causing enormous damage to the society in which he is located.

Our country, I see, respects its past, lives in the present, but, of course, looks to the future. To a very good future.

WORTH FROM MIND

(Comedy, 1824; published with omissions - 1833; completely - 1862)

Molchalin Alexey Stepanych - the main negative character of the comedy, the role of a stupid lover; Sophia's heartfelt friend, who despises her in his heart; the shadow of Famusov, the antagonist of Chatsky, whose fiery talkativeness is unfavorably contrasted with Silently’s wordlessness (emphasized, moreover, by the “silently speaking” surname). Transferred by Famusov from Tver, thanks to his patronage he received the rank of collegiate assessor; is listed “according to the archives”, but in fact is the personal, home secretary of the “benefactor”; Here, in the closet, he lives. M. strictly follows his father’s covenant (directly preceding the one that Pavel Ivanovich Chichikov will receive from his father): “to please all people without exception - / the Master<...>/ To the boss<...>/ To his servant<...>/ To the janitor’s dog, so that she is affectionate.” In the ball scene (no. 3) he helpfully praises the Spitz of the old woman Khlestova, Famusov’s sister-in-law - which deserves her favor. (But not respect: during the journey - D. 4, appearance 8 - Khlestova disdainfully points M. to his place - intermediate between the secretary and the servant: “here is your closet, / There is no need for a farewell, go, the Lord is with you”; M . is not offended.)

In a conversation with Chatsky (house 3, appearance 3), who decided to figure out why M. captivated Sofia, he formulates his life rules - “Moderation and accuracy”; “At my age I shouldn’t dare / Have my own judgment.” These views are fully consistent with the unwritten Moscow norm. Throughout the comedy, the same plot motif of the fall is repeated; Chatsky, as soon as he appeared in the house, talks about how he “fell many times” along the way; Skalozub recalls the story of Princess Lasova, “a horsewoman, a widow,” who recently fell to pieces and is now looking for a husband “for support”; then, during the ball, Repetilov reports about his fall: “I’m hastening here, / Grabbing, I hit my foot on the threshold / And stretched out to my full height.” But only M.’s fall from a horse (d. 2, yavl. 7), at the news of which Sofia faints, “rhymes” with the “exemplary” fall of Famusov’s uncle Maxim Petrovich: “He fell painfully - he got up well.” This parallel finally fits M. into the unchanging Moscow tradition against which Chatsky rebels.

But, repeating the trajectory of the fall of Maxim Petrovich, M., in turn, is also endowed with a plot double, repeating his negative traits in an even more vulgar and reduced form. This is Anton Antonich Zagoretsky - “the man<...>secular, / An out-and-out swindler, a rogue,” who is tolerated in society only because he is “a master at serving.”

The need to tirelessly “please” also gave birth to M.’s romance with Sophia, in which he obediently plays the role of a platonic admirer suggested (if not imposed) by her, ready to read novels from his beloved all night long, listen to silence and express himself in a language that is not characteristic of him (philistine) ( “I have three little things...”), but in the literary-salon, “Karamzinist” language of silent gestures and refined feelings. (So ​​his “speaking” surname can be read in two ways: it also indicates the role of the loving “silent man” in Sofia’s plot.) This novel does not and cannot pursue “career” goals; M. does not expect to earn even greater favor from Famusov in this way. On the contrary, he risks losing his favor as a result of a secret “romance”. But he is not able to refuse to “please” the daughter of “such a person.” And, feeling hostility towards “our deplorable thief,” she takes on the appearance of a lover - because that’s what she wants.

And therefore, perhaps Chatsky is right, who at the moment of M.’s “exposure” (invited by the maid Liza to Sofia’s room, he again flirts with the servants in the dark and speaks contemptuously about Sofia, not knowing that she hears everything; an angry Famusov immediately appears ) sarcastically remarks: “You will make peace with him after mature reflection. / Destroy yourself, and why! / Think, you can always / Take care of him and swaddle him, and send him to work. / A boy-husband, a servant-husband, one of the wife’s pages - / The high ideal of all Moscow husbands.”

In A.S. Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit,” the poet depicts the image of Molchalin, the meaning of which has not lost its relevance today. N.V. Gogol was the first to notice the features of a sycophant, secretly, with the help of undisguised frank flattery, and M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, in the grotesque manner characteristic of the writer, portrays Molchalin as an official with blood-stained hands, striving to climb the career ladder, pushing move more intelligent and worthy.

The image of Molchalin emerges especially clearly in his interactions with other characters in the play and, above all, in his relationship with Sophia. Molchalin understands that by feigning love for Famusov’s daughter, he enlists her support and appears before Sophia as a timid and modest lover. The girl does not catch his pretense, and perceives the absence of sincere and passionate feelings as restraint and sobriety of mind. Molchalin understands that Chatsky’s appearance in Famusov’s house threatens his relationship with Sophia, and therefore his career. He is trying in every possible way to strengthen his position. Molchalin fakes a fall from a horse, pretending to be so injured in front of Sophia that the girl in love with him faints. He is so hypocritical that he immediately gets up and shakes himself off as soon as Sophia is carried into the house in a fainting state. Molchalin's cynicism knows no bounds. Despite possible exposure, he brazenly pesters Lisa, not paying attention to her refusal and reproaches that Molchalin is a rake with the maid, and a modest one with the young lady. Mean by nature, Molchalin tries in every possible way to denigrate Chatsky in the eyes of Sophia, portraying him as talkative and frivolous, ready to ridicule anyone as a tactless person. Succumbing to his harmful influence, Sophia begins to look at Chatsky through the eyes of Molchalin. She gets into an argument with Chatsky and proves to him that Molchalin is a decent and virtuous young man. She even tries to contrast the virtuous Molchalin with the mocking and sharp-tongued Chatsky. This opposition, put into Sophia’s mouth, takes on a much deeper meaning than the opposition of the characters and traits of two rivals. This is a contrast between two different life positions. On the one hand, a sincere, decent person, who does not tolerate pretense, flattery, who does not mix pleasure and work, on the other hand, he is a most pitiable creature, a fool, who is nothing worthwhile, who achieves success in dirty and vile, roundabout ways. Without hesitation, Molchalin himself says that he fulfills his father’s will to please everyone in order to avoid evil, be it the owner, boss, servant, doorman or janitor’s dog. And Molchalin strictly follows his father’s precepts, not only in words. He gives the noble lady Khlestova the opportunity to win at cards, strokes and praises her dog, winning the favor of the eminent lady.

Molchalin’s speech deserves special attention, obsequious with those who occupy the highest position in society and condescendingly dismissive with those on whom he does not depend. Molchalin is laconic and careful; he carefully and diligently selects the right words, taking into account the person to whom he is addressing. In a conversation with Famusov, he is respectful and always emphasizes his desire for work; he addresses Khlestova with undisguised flattery. While with Sophia Molchalin is modest all night long and only holds her hand, with Lisa he does not choose words, but directly and rudely demands intimacy from her. Molchalin also does not stand on ceremony with Chatsky, he shows him his superiority, boasts of his career and love successes and even tries to encourage Chatsky to follow his example and visit the influential Tatyana Yuryevna in order to achieve rank. Chatsky rightly and with regret states that in the existing society the dumb enjoy special favor from their superiors, they can go far and achieve well-known degrees.

The final scene of the play debunks Molchalin's hidden agenda, and Sophia rejects him. However, Moscow at that time gave preference to the likes of the Molchalins, who moved up the career ladder with the help of flattery and helpfulness, and rejected the smart and energetic Chatskys in every possible way. "Woe from Wit" is performed on the stage of many theaters and the problems of careerism raised in this play remain relevant to this day. This was proven by many actors who played the role of Molchalin, including the first vaudeville actor N.O. Dur in 1831 and K.Yu. Lavrov, who showed Molchalin as the second main character in the plot of Griboyedov’s comedy in 1962.

Characters in the comedy by A.S. Griboyedov’s “Woe from Wit”, in full accordance with the rules of classicism, are endowed with “speaking” surnames. However, here the coincidence is purely external: Molchalin, of course, is dumb (Chatsky: “Hasn’t he broken the silence of the press yet?..”, “Here he is. On tiptoe and not rich in words”; Sophia: “Serves under the priest for three years, // He is often pointlessly angry, // And he disarms him with silence.” But silence is not so much a trait of his character as a way of achieving goals (“After all, nowadays they love the dumb”).

Molchalin talks easily and freely with Lisa, reveals his system of views to Chatsky. Consequently, the character of the hero is not completely exhausted by the “speaking” surname.

Molchalin speaks very little, but the few words that he utters in dialogues with other characters are enough to reveal his character. In a dialogue with Famusov, Molchalin appears as a quiet, helpful young man. He realizes his dependence on Famusov, so he behaves very modestly. His remarks in this dialogue are striking in their insinuating quality: “I heard your voice,” “Just back from a walk,” “With papers, sir.” Moreover, it is worth paying attention to the characteristic particle “s”, which appears in Molchalin’s speech only when he addresses his superiors. In dialogues with Lisa, he is much more verbose. Here his feelings and emotions are manifested (“You are a cheerful creature! Alive!”, “What a face you have! How I love you!”). He is really frank, there is no ostentatious modesty and obsequiousness here.

If dialogues with Liza reveal Molchalin’s feelings, then dialogue with Chatsky reveals his social position. From their conversation we learn that Molchalin belongs to the “bygone century”: he shares public opinion, does not dare to have his own:

At my age I shouldn't dare

Have your own judgment

he spreads gossip:

Tatyana Yuryevna said something,

Returning from St. Petersburg,

With ministers about your connection,

Then the break...

he is a careerist, he wants, like all representatives of Famus society, to make a career through dishonest means:

...So, often there

We find protection where we do not seek it.

Every action of Molchalin exposes him as a “low-worshipper and a businessman.” Whatever he does, he pursues one goal: to get the best possible life in life. He tries with all his might to win Famusov’s favor, win Chatsky’s respect, and serve Khlestova. He wants to please everyone, do something nice for everyone, but all this is only for selfish reasons.

When compared with Chatsky, who is sincere in his actions and words, Molchalin appears as a pretender and a liar. He lies to everyone (except Lisa): Famusov, who does not know about the affair with his daughter, Sophia, whom he does not love at all, but only “according to his position” plays the role of a lover.

Molchalin and Sophia are completely different people, which makes it all the more surprising that “God brought them together.” Sophia's lively mind cannot be compared with Molchalin's practical mind, and the courage and determination of her actions contrasts sharply with his lackey obedience and obsequiousness.

At the same time, Sophia does not notice his shortcomings. She admires his spiritual qualities, not noticing that she herself is exposing him as a narrow-minded person:

He served under his father for three years,

He is often pointlessly angry,

And he will disarm him with silence.

Of course he doesn’t have this mind,

What a genius is to some, and a plague to others,

Which is fast, brilliant and will soon become disgusting.

He is finally: compliant, modest, quiet,

Not a shadow of worry in his face

And there are no wrongdoings in my soul

He doesn’t cut strangers at random.

Chatsky, on the contrary, guessed Molchalin from the very first meeting and, after time, still did not change his opinion:

There is just little intelligence in him...

Molchalin was so stupid before!..

Most pathetic creature!

Chatsky denies Molchalin intelligence, and in general believes that he does not deserve any attention. That is why he so does not want to believe that Sophia fell in love with this man. At the same time, Chatsky notices Molchalin’s ability to adapt, to be in the right place at the right time:

Molchalin! – Who else will settle everything so peacefully!

There he will stroke the pug in time,

It’s time to wipe the card,

Zagoretsky will not die in it!

Husband-boy, husband-servant.

Famusov, although he understands that Molchalin is close to his society, sees the similarity of their views, still keeps him in the house only “for business reasons.” And he shows this “efficiency” with the greatest zeal only to move up the career ladder; he uses Famusov.

Of course, Griboedov's assessment of this character is categorically negative. The author vividly depicts the phenomenon of “silence”, and also explains the essence and reasons for this phenomenon. It is obvious that by age Molchalin belongs to Chatsky’s generation. But the consciousness in him remains from the “past century,” and he strives to achieve the goal in the simplest way; since there are only a few Chatskys, their way of existence, their desire to assert themselves does not seem easy, and therefore unacceptable for Molchalin.

The comedy “Woe from Wit” by A. Griboyedov was created in 1824. Due to the revealing content of the work, it was published only in 1833, and even then selectively. Only in 1862 did a full-fledged comedy see the light. In his work, the author wished to speak out about what pained him after so many years of contemplating the hypocrisy and sycophancy of the people around him. The comedy “Woe from Wit” is a confrontation between an intelligent, thinking, active, open and honest person and vile, vile, immoral people who care only about wealth and rank.

General characteristics of Molchalin A.S.

Famusov's faithful dog, Sophia's dear friend, a sycophant, a hypocrite, a rootless official, Chatsky's main antagonist - that's who Alexey Stepanych Molchalin is. The characterization of the central character of the comedy shows a typical representative on whom serfdom-bureaucratic morality had its corrupting influence. Since childhood, Molchalin was taught to be servile, to please everyone around him: the boss, the owner, the butler, the janitor’s dog, in the end, so that he would be affectionate.

The character's character is fully revealed by his self-explanatory surname. Basically, Alexey Stepanych is silent, suffers humiliation, screams, even unfair reproaches. He understands perfectly well that a rootless official cannot live in this callous and cynical society without the support of people in power, so he pleases everyone around him, trying not to quarrel with anyone, to be good for everyone, and he succeeds excellently. The author of the comedy is sad that society is teeming with such heroes who know how to remain silent where necessary, stroke the dog of an influential lady, say a compliment, lift a scarf and for all this receive formal awards and ranks, while in reality remaining servants.

Quote from Molchalin

Secretary Famusov is characterized by different characters in the comedy: Chatsky, Sofia, Famusov, Lisa. Someone speaks of him as a modest, handsome, quiet and timid person, ready to endure all humiliations and reproaches. Some heroes of the work guess about his low soul, and only a few see Molchalin’s true face.

Sophia sees in Alexey Stepanych a fictitious image: “I’m ready to forget myself for others,” “the enemy of insolence, - always shy, timid.” The girl thinks that Molchalin behaves shyly because he is modest by nature, not suspecting that this is just one of his masks. “He served under his father for three years, he often gets angry to no avail, but he disarms with his silence, forgives out of the kindness of his soul,” Alexei’s slavish obedience speaks of his certain position in life, which involves remaining silent, enduring, but not getting involved in a scandal.

Molchalin reveals his true face to Lisa: “Why are you and the young lady modest, but the maid a rake?” Only her secretary tells her about his true feelings for Sophia. Chatsky also guesses about Alexei’s duplicity and pettiness: “He will reach the well-known levels, because nowadays they love the dumb,” “Who else will settle everything so peacefully! There he’ll pet a pug at the right time, here he’ll wipe a card at the right time...” A brief description of Molchalin shows that his silence is not at all a manifestation of stupidity. This is a clearly thought out plan for obtaining benefits.

Speech characteristics of Molchalin

The manner of conversation of Alexey Stepanych very successfully characterizes his inner appearance. Toadying, humility, and servility are the main characters, so in his speech one can discern diminutive words, self-deprecating intonations, exaggerated courtesy, and an obsequious tone. To please people who are richer and higher in rank, the hero adds the prefix “s” to words. Molchalin is mostly silent and tries not to engage in conversation unnecessarily. He shows his eloquence only in front of Lisa, in front of whom he can take off his mask and show his true face.

The hero's attitude towards Sophia

The ability to please helps in moving up the career ladder - that’s exactly what Molchalin thinks. The character’s description suggests that he even started an affair with Sophia for the reason that she is Famusov’s daughter, and a close relative of the boss cannot be denied fulfilling his whims. The girl herself invented a hero and imposed her feelings on Alexei Stepanych, making him a platonic admirer. In order to please the lady, he is ready to abandon his native bourgeois dialect and communicate in the language of silent glances and gestures. Molchalin sits silently next to Sophia all night long, reading novels with her, only because he cannot refuse the boss’s daughter. The hero himself not only does not love the girl, but also considers her a “deplorable theft.”

Comparative characteristics of the images of Molchalin and Famusov

The problem of bureaucracy is one of the main issues addressed in the comedy "Woe from Wit." Molchalin's characterization gives the reader an idea of ​​a new type of official of the early 19th century. He and Famusov belong to the world of bureaucrats, but still are not alike because they belong to different centuries. The master is an elderly rich man with an established opinion and an established career. Alexey Stepanych is still young, so he works as a minor official and is just climbing the career ladder.

In the 19th century, a new type of Russian bureaucrat emerged who abandoned the commandments of the “fathers.” This is exactly what Molchalin’s characterization shows. "Woe from Wit" is a story about a socio-political conflict that expresses the situation of society. Be that as it may, Molchalin still belongs to Famusov’s circle, and just like his boss, he admires rank and wealth.

Molchalin and Chatsky

A comparative description of Molchalin and Chatsky shows how different they are. Molchalin, Famusov’s secretary, does not have a noble origin, but has developed his own tactics, following which he builds a reliable and comfortable future for himself. You can’t get a word out of him once again, but he knows how to run on tiptoe, work with papers and appear at the right moment, and many people like this. Silent, helpful, spineless people were valued in the era of Nicholas I, so someone like Molchalin was expected to have a brilliant career and awards for services to their homeland. In appearance, he is a modest young man, Sophia likes him with his meekness and compliance, pleases Famusov with patience and silence, curries favor with Khlestova and only shows his true face to the maid Liza - vile, two-faced, cowardly.

Chatsky is the embodiment of the image of the Decembrists, a romantic nobleman who reveals the evils of serfdom. It is his antagonist who is Molchalin. The characterization of the hero shows that he embodies the features of an advanced thinking person of the early 19th century. Chatsky is convinced that he is right, therefore, without hesitation he preaches new ideals, reveals the ignorance of the current rich, exposes their false patriotism, inhumanity, and hypocrisy. This is a freethinker who fell into a rotten society, and this is his trouble.

The hero's life principles

Griboedov's hero Molchalin became a common name for lackeys and meanness. The character's description shows that Alexey Stepanych, from childhood, programmed a plan in his head on how to get out into the world, build a career, and achieve a high rank. He walked along his path without turning to the sides. This person is absolutely indifferent to the feelings of other people, he will not lend a helping hand to anyone if it is not beneficial.

The main theme of the comedy

The theme of bureaucracy, which was raised by many writers in the 19th century, runs through the entire comedy “Woe from Wit”. The state bureaucracy kept growing and turning into a serious machine, grinding down all the rebels and working in a way that was beneficial to it. Griboyedov in his work showed real people, his contemporaries. He set himself the goal of ridiculing certain human traits, showing the tragedy of society of that era, and the writer did it perfectly.

History of the comedy

Once a rumor spread throughout Moscow that Alexander Griboyedov University professor Thomas Evans, alarmed by this news, decided to visit the writer. In turn, Griboyedov told his interlocutor a story that happened to him at one of the balls. He was tired of the antics of society praising some Frenchman, an ordinary talker who had done nothing remarkable. Griboedov could not restrain himself and expressed to those around him everything that he thought about them, and someone from the crowd shouted out that the writer was a little out of his mind. Alexander Sergeevich was offended and promised to create a comedy, the heroes of which would be those unlucky spiteful critics who called him crazy. This is how the work “Woe from Wit” was born.