Rene Magritte: paintings with names and descriptions. "Son of Man" painting by Rene Magritte. Painting "Lovers" by Rene Magritte. Rene Magritte. Ordinary surrealism Rene Magritte paintings with description and analysis

Here I have posted paintings by Rene Magritte with titles. Also a few facts about the character and philosophy of this man. For those wishing to learn more about the biography of this artist, I advise you to watch the film “Monsignor Magritte.”

I put off this post for a long time, not because I don’t like Rene Magritte, but rather the opposite because of the significance of this phenomenon. Actually, in my understanding, the pillars of surrealism in painting are two people: Salvador Dali and Rene Magritte. They're like Tolkien and Lewis in fantasy. Magritte and Dali influenced and continue to influence all surrealists.

However, these were two completely different people, as different as their paintings. Rene Magritte, in contrast to Dali and all the other surrealists, did not like to shock the public, did not start fights, did not use fly agarics for inspiration, and spent his entire life with one woman - his wife Georgette, his main muse, soul mate and model.

Philosophy of Rene Magritte

What is curious is that the man who, along with Dali, is considered a classic of surrealism did not even recognize the philosophy of this movement, in which psychoanalysis occupied one of the main places. The Belgian believed that creativity cannot be analyzed, that it is a mystery, a philosophical puzzle, but not the subject of Freudian analysis.

Considering this philosophy, it is not surprising that many of his works often cause bewilderment and the feeling that the artist is making fun of you. Obviously, such ambiguity and symbolism contributed to the fact that many parodies and installations were created on his paintings. The painting “Son of Man” is especially popular in this regard.

Quite a decent burgher :) They didn’t give you that with your spacesuit :)

In general, Magritte was a quiet, calm person, and the most interesting things happened in his head. Perhaps that is why so few films have been made about Rene Magritte, unlike Dali.

I will not dryly list the facts from his biography here; 100,500 other people have already done this for me. I think that’s not why people come to the blog, after all, that’s what pediwiki is for. If you want to get to know the biography of this artist, I advise you to watch the film Monsieur Rene Magritte (Monsieur Rene Magritte) 1978. It is more interesting than reading a dry Wikipedia text (with all due respect to pedivics).

Paintings by René Magritte with titles

Everything this man wanted to tell us, he said with his paintings. The paintings of Rene Magritte, in contrast to the stormy pressure of Dali's whimsical visions, are calmer and more philosophical. In addition, Magritte’s paintings are imbued with a very peculiar sense of humor. Just look at his painting of a pipe with a signature below - it’s not a pipe.


La Philosophie dans le boudoir (Philosophy in the boudoir)

La Magie noire (Black Magic) It is said that all the female images in his paintings are images of his wife. Looking at this picture, you begin to understand why he lived his whole life with one woman. In my opinion, much prettier than Gala.
La Memoire (Memory).
Cosmogonie Elementaire (Elementary cosmogony).
La Naissance de l'idole (The Birth of an Idol).
La Belle captive (The Beautiful Captive).
L’Invention collective (Collective invention), painting by René Magritte.
Les Amants (Lovers), Rene Magritte, paintings, surrealism. Le Thérapeute II (The Therapist II), Rene Magritte, artists, surrealism.

Le Fils de l'homme (The Son of Man), René Magritte. One of the artist's most famous paintings.
Le Faux miroir (The False Mirror),
Le Coup au coeur (A blow to the heart)

One of the outstanding artists of the last century, Rene Magritte (1898-1967) was originally from Belgium. In 1912, his mother drowned herself in the river, which apparently had a great impression on the future artist, who was then still a teenager; however, contrary to popular belief, the influence of this event on the author’s work should not be overestimated. Magritte brought back from his childhood a number of other, not so tragic, but no less mysterious memories, which he himself said were reflected in his work.

Educated at the Academy of Fine Arts in Brussels, he was initially strongly influenced by Dada and Cubism. The year 1925 was a turning point in his work: the painting “Roses of Picardy” marked a new style and a new attitude - “poetic realism”. The artist moves to the “center of surrealism” - Paris, where he participates in all surrealist exhibitions. And in 1938, the first major exhibition of the Belgian master was organized by the London art gallery.

In the early 1950s. Magritte's art is receiving ever-increasing international recognition, as evidenced by his large exhibitions in Rome, London, New York, Paris, and Brussels. In 1956, Magritte, as an outstanding representative of Belgian culture, was awarded the prestigious Guggenheim Prize.

The main feature of Magritte is the atmosphere of mystery in his works. A sense of mystery, as we know, is inherent in real art. “I have always considered Magritte an imaginary artist, a master somewhere on the level of Giorgione,” wrote Herbert Read. These words contain the key to Magritte’s poetics.

In the painting “False Mirror” (1929), which expressed the artist’s ideological credo, the entire space is occupied by the image of a huge eye. Only instead of the iris, the viewer sees a summer blue sky with transparent clouds floating across it. The title explains the idea of ​​the painting: the senses only reflect the external appearance of things, without conveying the hidden depth of the world, its secrets. Only the incompatible helps, according to Magritte, to grasp the meaning of existence. An image can only be born from the convergence of two more or less distant realities.

Magritte would follow this method throughout his entire creative career, which is especially noticeable in his “philosophical” paintings. One of them is “Hegel’s Vacation” (1958).

“My last painting,” he wrote, “began with a question: how to depict a glass of water in a picture in such a way that it would not be indifferent to us? But at the same time, in such a way that it would not be particularly bizarre, arbitrary or insignificant. One. in a word so that one could say: brilliant (let’s leave unnecessary shame).
I started drawing the glasses one by one (three sketches), each time with a cross stroke (sketch). After the hundredth or hundred and fiftieth
drawing, the stroke became somewhat wider (sketch). At first the umbrella stood inside the glass (sketch), but then it ended up under it (sketch).
So I found a solution to the original question: how can a glass of water be depicted in a brilliant way. I soon realized that this subject could be of great interest to Hegel (he is also a genius), because my subject combines two opposing
aspirations: does not want water (repels it) and wants water (picks it up). I think he would have liked it or found it funny (for example, during the holidays). That's why I called the painting "Hegel's Vacation."

Magritte stands out sharply among the surrealists: unlike them, he uses not fantastic, but everyday elements, taken in bizarre relationships. This is his famous painting “Personal Property” (1952).

The “key” here also becomes the name. The “personal” is hypertrophied to monstrous proportions. The room turns into a kind of “microcosm”, closed, squeezed, despite the sky with clouds floating across it instead of walls. All the things here have strangely changed, as if they have come to life, acquired a non-utilitarian appearance, although, as always with Magritte, the objects have not changed their appearance, texture, color and are perfectly “recognizable”. The viewer, as if in passing, admires the bluish shine of the glass of the glass, the texture of the wooden furniture, and the skill of conveying mirror reflections. But precisely in passing, because the objects seem to have gained independence, as if they speak on behalf of their owner, completely usurping his “leading” role. They themselves have become “personalities” and seem to be having a conversation among themselves.

One of the features of early Magritte’s painting is its “literariness” in the good sense of the word. Magritte moves in a circle of poets, philosophers, writers, and studies the theoretical works of famous romantics of the 19th century. He was greatly influenced by the works of the English romantic poet and philosopher of the early 19th century. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who first of all revered symbolism in art - such “a complete subordination of matter to spirit that matter turns into a symbol through which the spirit reveals itself.”

An illustration of this idea is, in particular, Magritte’s famous painting “Liberation” (“Flight into the Fields”), created in 1933.

A strange landscape opens from a broken window. Greenish evening hills, spherical blue trees, transparent mother-of-pearl sky, blue distances. Brilliantly using the techniques of tonal painting, the artist creates a mood of joyful elation, expectation of something unusual and wonderful. The warm shade of the curtains in the foreground enhances the impression of the airiness of this enchanted landscape... Magritte’s paintings seem to be made with a calm, intrepid hand. Master of color, Magritte uses it sparingly and sparingly. In "Liberation" the symbolism of color is used to express complex associations. Spots of blue, pink, yellow and black give the image an amazing color fullness and liveliness.

The originality of Rene Magritte's work will be revealed more fully if we turn to the topic "Surrealism and Freudianism." The main theoretician of surrealism, Andre Breton, a psychiatrist by profession, attached decisive importance to Freud's psychoanalysis when assessing the artist's work. Freudian views were not only adopted by many surrealists - it became their way of thinking. For example, for Salvador Dali, by his own admission, the world of Freud’s ideas meant as much as the world of Scripture for medieval artists or the world of ancient mythology for the masters of the Renaissance.

The “method of free association” proposed by Sigmund Freud, his “theory of errors”, and “interpretation of dreams” were aimed primarily at identifying painful mental disorders for the purpose of healing. The interpretation of works of art proposed by Freud was also aimed at this. But with this understanding, art is reduced to a private, so to speak, “healing” factor. This was the fallacy of the approach of the theorists of surrealism to works of art. Magritte was well aware of this, who noted in one of his letters in 1937: “Art, as I understand it, is not subject to psychoanalysis. It is always a mystery.” The artist treated attempts to interpret his paintings with the help of psychoanalysis ironically: “They decided that my “Red Model” is an example of a castration complex. After listening to several explanations of this kind, I made a drawing according to all the “rules” of psychoanalysis. Naturally, they analyzed it in the same way cold-bloodedly. It’s terrible to see what kind of mockery a person can be subjected to after making one innocent drawing... Perhaps psychoanalysis itself is the best topic for a psychoanalyst.”

This is why Magritte stubbornly refused to call himself a “surrealist.” He readily accepted the description of a "magical realist." This direction is characteristic of the “Belgian period” of his work - starting in 1930, when Magritte returned from Paris to Brussels for good.

The traditions of old Dutch art had a beneficial influence on Magritte's work. In the painting “Plagiarism” (1960), several symbolic details attract attention.

On the left on the table we see an image of a nest and three eggs - symbolism of the Trinity. Like a wizard, the artist seems to materialize before our eyes the images of his imagination, and they turn into a beautiful fruit-bearing garden - a symbol of a living creative imagination. Magritte creates a subtle, spiritualized poetic image. Contemplating the picture, one can only admire the most delicate pink, bluish, pearlescent shades - a truly fabulous sight.

In the 1930s Magritte, along with the art of Bosch, deeply studies the work of his compatriot, playwright and philosopher Maurice Maeterlinck, who back in 1889 in the collection “Greenhouses” wrote: “A symbol is a force of nature, but the human mind cannot resist its laws... If there is no symbol, there is no work of art."

Magritte owes Maeterlinck the ability to develop comparison into a whole network of images that the artist’s imagination turns into the real world. In the painting “Madness of Greatness” (1948), a dying candle is depicted on a stone parapet against the background of an endless azure sea - as a symbol of the frailty of human life. Nearby are several female torsos growing out of each other (a symbol of sensuality). And in the sky with beautiful frozen clouds (for Magritte - a symbol of timelessness), the viewer sees blue “incorporeal” geometric shapes, symbolizing “pure ideas”, and a hot air balloon - a symbol of abstract “pure thought”.

With the help of a finely thought-out color scheme, the artist “clarifies” the main idea. His “sensuality” is a warm flesh color. “Pure Forms” are designed in a cold bluish tonality, corresponding to the symbolism and at the same time creating a feeling of limitless space.

“We wander at random through the valley, not realizing that all our movements are reproduced and acquire their true meaning on the top of the mountain,” Maeterlinck wrote in his treatise “Treasure of the Humble,” “and it is necessary that from time to time someone comes to us and said: look up, look what you are, look what you are doing. We do not live here, our life is up there. This look that we exchanged in the darkness, these words that made no sense at the foot of the mountain - look. what they have become and what they mean there, above the snowy heights."

This idea of ​​Maeterlinck was reflected in Magritte’s painting “The Possession of Arnheim” (1962).

Only by breaking glass with a false image painted on it can one see reality in all its radiant splendor, the artist believes. It is here, on the tops of the mountains that Maeterlinck spoke about, that the Truth lurks.

The painting “An Unexpected Answer” (1933) embodies another thought of Maeterlinck: “There are no insignificant days in life. Go, come back, go out again - you will find what you need in the twilight. But never forget that you are close to the door. This “perhaps one of those narrow cracks in the doors of darkness, through which we are given the opportunity to see for a moment everything that is about to happen in the grotto of treasures that have not yet been discovered.”

The painting looks like a kind of emblem of an exciting mystery - everything here is so integral, “natural,” if this definition can be attributed to one of Magritte’s most mysterious and mystical compositions. An open “hacked door” is a symbol of another dimension, fraught with many mysteries.

Some authors writing about Magritte declare him an “artist of the absurd,” whose paintings lack any meaning. If this were the case, if the artist's goal was to depict only "the absurdity of our daily existence", it would be creativity on the level of a puzzle, and not the serious art that it is. Magritte wrote: “We ask a picture at random, instead of listening to it. And we are surprised when the answer we receive is not frank.”

His art was often called "daydreams." The artist clarified: “My paintings are not dreams that put you to sleep, but dreams that awaken you.” It is not for nothing that the prominent surrealist Max Ernst, having seen his exhibition in New York in the early 1950s, said: “Magritte neither sleeps nor stays awake. He illuminates. He conquers the world of dreams.”

“Without mystery, neither the world nor the idea are possible,” Magritte never tired of repeating. And as an epigraph to one of his self-portraits, he took a line from a 19th century French poet. Lautréamont: “I sometimes dream, but never for a moment do I lose consciousness of my identity.”

Hence the unexpected interpretation of “internal and external” in Magritte’s works.

Here is the artist’s commentary on his painting “Frames of Life” (1934): “In front of the window, which we see from inside the room, I placed a painting depicting exactly that part of the landscape that it covers. Thus, the tree in the picture obscures the tree standing behind For the viewer, the tree is simultaneously inside the room in the picture and outside in the real landscape. This is how we see the world outside of us and at the same time we see its representation within ourselves. what is happening in the present. Thus, time and space are freed from the trivial meaning with which ordinary consciousness gives them."

Herbert Read noted: “Magritte is distinguished by the severity of his forms and a distinct clarity of vision. His symbolism is pure and transparent, like the glass of windows that he so loves to depict. Rene Magritte warns about the fragility of the world. The glass is broken: significantly freezing in flight, the images fall, lining up in a row like ice floes." This is an example of one possible interpretation of Magritte's polysemous metaphors. This artist’s motif of a glass window can also be seen as the border between two worlds - the real and the surreal, the poetic and the everyday, between the conscious and the unconscious.

In the painting “Son of Man” (1964), modern man is depicted against the backdrop of a wall separating him from the vast expanses of the ocean and sky, symbolizing infinity. An apple hanging in front of a person’s face adds mystery to the image. This apple can be perceived both as the fruit of the tree of knowledge and as a symbol of nature, which man is trying to understand. At the same time, this detail gives harmony to the prosaic appearance of a neat bourgeois.

The painting “Golconda” (1953) can be seen as an embodied metaphor: people “with weight” have become weightless. There is irony hidden in the name: after all, Golconda is a semi-legendary city in India, famous for its gold deposits and diamonds, and these people seem to be attracted to gold. The artist hangs in a boundless space several dozen neatly dressed rentiers with bowler hats, ties and fashionable coats, while maintaining absolute equanimity.

In one of Magritte’s later paintings, “Ready Bouquet” (1956), a man in the same bowler hat and tails, standing with his back to the viewer on the terrace, contemplates the evening park. And on his back is depicted “Spring” by Botticelli, walking in flowers and the brilliance of colors. What is this? Realization of the aphorism “Man passes, art remains”? Or perhaps a person admiring the park remembered a Botticelli painting? The answer is unclear.

The artist seeks to destroy the usual idea of ​​the well-known, unchanging, to make him see the object in a new dimension, leading the viewer to confusion. In his canvases, he created a world of fantasy and dreams from real things, immersing viewers in an atmosphere of dreams and mystery. The artist brilliantly knew how to “direct” their feelings. It would seem that the world created by the artist is static and strong, but the unreal always invades the everyday, destroying this familiar world (an ordinary apple in a room, growing, displaces people, or a steam locomotive jumps out of the fireplace at full speed - “Pierced Time”, 1939).

The most frequently copied painting is The Creation of Man (1935). The image of the sea in the painting on the easel standing in front of the open window miraculously merges with the “real” sea view from the window.

The theme of many of Magritte’s paintings was the so-called “hidden reality”. Part of the image, for example, the face of the main character, is covered with something (an apple, a bouquet of flowers, a bird). Magritte explains the meaning of these works: “The interesting thing in these paintings is the presence of the open and the hidden that suddenly burst into our consciousness, which in nature are never separated from each other.”

In the painting “The Lovers,” Rene Magritte shows that when we are truly in love, our eyes are closed.

Trying to comprehend the elusive meaning of Magritte’s paintings, to “explain” them, the viewer’s mind frantically grabs at both. The artist "throws" the title of the painting to him (it usually appeared after the work was completed). Magritte gave the title a decisive role in the perception of the painting. According to the recollections of relatives and friends, when coming up with names, he often discussed them with literary friends. Here is what the artist himself said about this: “The title is an indicator of the function of the painting,” “The title should contain a living emotion,” “The best title for a painting is poetic. It should not teach anything, but instead, surprise and fascinate.”

Many of the titles of the paintings are deliberately scientific, and irony is visible in them: “Philosophical Lamp” (1937), “Praise of Dialectics” (1937), “Natural Knowledge” (1938), “Treatise on Sensations” (1944). Other titles create an atmosphere of poetic mystery: “Dialogue Interrupted by the Wind” (1928), “The Key to Dreams” (1930), “Painful Duration” (1939), “Empire of Light” (1950), “God’s Living Room” (1958).

The painting "Empire of Light" was painted by Magritte in the last decade of his life, but immediately became perhaps his most popular work. So popular that many collectors were willing to pay any money just to have one of its replicas in their collection.

So what is this picture that has captured the minds of people around the world? At a quick glance, it seems simple and even unassuming. A house on the shore of a small lake is hidden in the shade of spreading trees. The windows on the second floor glow with a cozy light, a lonely lantern gives its friendly light to a traveler who might find himself here on a dark night. It would seem like an ordinary, completely realistic nocturne. Any “traditional” artist can paint something like this.

But is this true? Why, then, does a vague uneasiness arise, forcing the viewer to peer more and more intently into the picture? This anxiety will not leave until it suddenly becomes clear - the sky, that's what it's all about! Blue sky with white fluffy clouds running merrily across it. And this is late at night! Just don’t ask how this is possible, because in Magritte’s world nothing is impossible. Like no other, this artist loves to connect the incompatible, to introduce into his paintings details that contrast so sharply with each other that the viewer first experiences a slight shock, but then his mind begins to work doubly intensely, trying to find a solution to the proposed charade.

Magritte himself said this about it: “I combined different concepts in “Empire of Light,” namely, a night landscape and the sky in all the glory of daylight. The landscape inclines us to think about the night, the sky - about the day. In my opinion, this simultaneous phenomenon of day and night has the power to surprise and enchant. And I call this power poetry.”

Rene Magritte himself

“Self-Portrait” (“Clear Eye”)

Recalling his childhood, he wrote: “I remember my amazement when I first saw the chessboard and the pieces on it. Frightening impression! Sheets of music where mysterious signs denoted sound and were not words!” Here is one small early work of the artist - “The Lost Jockey”, which became his creative manifesto.

A rider, rushing at full speed on a lathered horse, got lost in a surreal grove of huge chess pieces painted with musical notations.

Painting “Carte Blanche” or “The Obstacle of Emptiness”.

Magritte wrote about her: “Visible things can be invisible. If, for example, some people are riding horseback through the forest, then first you see them, then you don’t see them, but you know that they are there. In the painting “Carte Blanche,” the rider obscures the trees, and they obscure her. However, our power of thinking embraces both the visible and the invisible, and with the help of painting I make thoughts visible.”

Painting “Forbidden split”

It is interesting to note that in Magritte only images of birds are free from associative complexities. Birds carry the positive energy of flight, nothing more. There are no dead birds, fallen birds, with broken wings. The birds are alive, and their wings are full of Magritte's bright blue and white cirrus clouds (Big Family, 1963).

On August 15, 1967, Rene Magritte died of cancer. One of the artist-magicians of the 20th century, who in life looked so much like a respectable pharmacist, has passed away.
He led the quiet and calm life of a Belgian man in the street, far from the bustle of bohemians - a man who is difficult to pick out from the crowd. Dreams, paradoxes, fears, mysterious dangers filled only his paintings, not his life. The artist fought boredom only through creativity. The regularity of each day suited him quite well; he even painted most of his paintings in the dining room and until the end of his life he preferred the tram to other types of transport.
Once, shortly before his death, Magritte, this sophisticated master, said: “I still do not understand the reason why we live and die.” Perhaps the artist encrypted the clues to the causes and mysteries of existence in his rebus paintings? Anything is possible. Then it’s worth taking a closer look at them!

On June 2, 2009, a new museum dedicated to the work of the famous surrealist artist Rene Magritte opened in Brussels. The Royal Museum of Fine Arts allocated a room of 2.5 thousand square meters for it. The exhibition of the Rene Magritte Museum includes more than 200 works by the author - this is the largest collection in the world.

Alogism, absurdity, combination of the incongruous, paradoxical visual variability of images and figures - this is the basis of the foundations of surrealism. The founder of this movement is considered to be the embodiment of the theory of the subconscious of Sigmund Freud at the basis of surrealism. It was on this basis that many representatives of the movement created masterpieces that did not reflect objective reality, but were merely the embodiment of individual images inspired by the subconscious. The canvases painted by the surrealists could not be the product of either good or evil. They all evoked different emotions in different people. Therefore, we can say with confidence that this direction of modernism is quite controversial, which contributed to its rapid spread in painting and literature.

Surrealism as an illusion and literature of the 20th century

Salvador Dali, Paul Delvaux, Rene Magritte, Jean Arp, Max Ernst, Giorgio de Chirico, Yves Tanguy, Michael Parkes and Dorothy Tanning are the pillars of surrealism that emerged in France in the 20s of the last century. This trend is not limited to France, but has spread to other countries and continents. Surrealism greatly facilitated the perception of cubism and abstractionism.

One of the main postulates of the surrealists was the identification of the energy of creators with the human subconscious, which manifests itself in sleep, under hypnosis, in delirium during illness, or in random creative insights.

Distinctive characteristics of surrealism

Surrealism is a complex movement in painting, which many artists understood and understand in their own way. It is therefore not surprising that surrealism developed in two conceptually different directions. The first branch can easily be attributed to Miro, Max Ernst, Jean Arp and Andre Masson, in whose works the main place was occupied by images that smoothly turn into abstraction. The second branch takes as a basis the embodiment of a surreal image generated by the human subconscious, with illusory accuracy. Salvador Dali, who is an ideal representative of academic painting, worked in this direction. It is his works that are characterized by an accurate rendering of chiaroscuro and a careful manner of painting - dense objects have tangible transparency, while solid ones spread, massive and three-dimensional figures acquire lightness and weightlessness, and incompatible ones can be combined together.

Biography of Rene Magritte

Along with the works of Salvador Dali is the work of Rene Magritte, a famous Belgian artist who was born in the city of Lesin in 1898. In the family, except for Rene. there were two more children, and in 1912 a misfortune happened that influenced the life and work of the future artist - his mother died. This was reflected in Rene Magritte’s painting “In Memory of Mack Sennett,” which was painted in 1936. The artist himself claimed that circumstances had no influence on his life and work.

In 1916, Rene Magritte entered the Brussels Academy of Arts, where he met his future muse and wife Georgette Berger. After graduating from the Academy, Rene worked on creating advertising materials, and was quite dismissive of this. Futurism, Cubism and Dada had a huge influence on the artist, but in 1923, Rene Magritte first saw Giorgio de Chirico's work "Song of Love". It was this moment that became the starting point for the development of the surrealist Rene Magritte. At the same time, the formation of a movement began in Brussels, of which Rene Magritte became a representative along with Marcel Lecampte, Andre Suri, Paul Nouger and Camille Gemans.

The works of Rene Magritte.

The works of this artist have always been controversial and attracted a lot of attention.


At first glance, Rene Magritte's painting is filled with strange images that are not only mysterious, but also ambiguous. Rene Magritte did not touch upon the issue of form in surrealism; he put his vision into the meaning and significance of the painting.

Many artists pay special attention to titles. Especially Rene Magritte. Paintings with the titles “This is not a pipe” or “Son of Man” awaken the thinker and philosopher in the viewer. In his opinion, not only the picture should encourage the viewer to express emotions, but also the title should surprise and make you think.
As for descriptions, many surrealists gave a brief summary of their paintings. Rene Magritte is no exception. Paintings with descriptions have always been present in the artist’s advertising activities.

The artist himself called himself a “magical realist.” His goal was to create a paradox, and the audience should draw their own conclusions. Rene Magritte in his works always clearly drew a line between the subjective image and real reality.

Painting "Lovers"

Rene Magritte painted a series of paintings called “Lovers” in 1927-1928 in Paris.

The first picture shows a man and a woman who are united in a kiss. Their heads are wrapped in white cloth. The second painting depicts the same man and woman in white cloth, looking out from the painting at the audience.

The white fabric in the artist’s work causes and has caused heated discussions. There are two versions. According to the first, white fabric in the works of Rene Magritte appeared in connection with the death of his mother in early childhood. His mother jumped off a bridge into the river. When her body was removed from the water, a white cloth was found wrapped around her head. As for the second version, many knew that the artist was a fan of Fantômas, the hero of the popular movie. Therefore, it may be that the white fabric is a tribute to the passion for cinema.

What is this picture about? Many people think that the painting “Lovers” personifies blind love: when people fall in love, they stop noticing someone or something other than their other half. But people remain mysteries to themselves. On the other hand, looking at the kiss of lovers, we can say that they have lost their heads with love and passion. Rene Magritte's painting is filled with mutual feelings and experiences.

"Son of Man"

Rene Magritte's painting "The Son of Man" became the hallmark of "magical realism" and a self-portrait of Rene Magritte. This particular work is considered one of the most controversial works of the master.


The artist hid his face behind an apple, as if saying that everything is not as it seems, and that people constantly want to get into a person’s soul and understand the true essence of things. Rene Magritte's painting both hides and reveals the essence of the master himself.

Rene Magritte played an important role in the development of surrealism, and his works continue to excite the consciousness of more and more generations.

Magritte, Rene

Rene Magritte(Rene Magritte) 1898 - 1967 - Belgian surrealist artist. Philosopher of surrealism in fine arts. He is known as the author of strange paintings that contain ambiguity and mystery. Unlike other surrealists, who strive to distort the object itself (form, image), in the paintings of Rene Magritte the “objectivity” of the image is almost not affected - the meaning, perception, understanding, multiplicity of meanings are surreal.

In each of his paintings, Magritte prepares a paradox. Each painting is a combination of an image, the way it is depicted and, even, the name of the painting. Magritte paid special attention to the titles of paintings - they seem to “guide” the viewer into reflection, leading them into a “rebus”. They set the viewer up to search for a solution, but the answers found will be a paradox or an aporia for logic. This situation forces the viewer to immerse himself in thought processes, the conclusions from which may surprise the viewer himself. The viewer unwittingly becomes a philosopher.

This is what the artist strives for. For a similar effect of his paintings, he calls himself " magical realist ". As Rene Magritte himself said, his goal is to make the viewer think. And the style of the deliberate primitive simplicity of the images forces one to focus on their symbolism. Like no one else, Rene Magritte used and “speculated” on the principle - symbols rule the world.

A similar practice of perceiving ambiguity and involuntary development of thinking processes exists in the practices of Zen Buddhism, when paradoxical (contrary to logic) tasks lead to a stormy process of searching for an answer, and, as a final result, to an understanding of the harmonious beauty of the answers. Philosophy of unity and integrity of opposites.

But Rene Magritte does not seek to develop the intellectual component of his work; he cynically exploits the popularity he has already gained. He stops only at the effect of visual perception, only creates a paradox of perception, and leaves subsequent conclusions to the viewer.

Unfortunately, the artist did not develop his unique style. Although Magritte had many later works in the form of “variations” of past successful paintings that received recognition. The semantic content of the paintings focuses on the idea - the paradoxical difference in perception between the image (image) and reality.

The famous image of a man in a bowler hat becomes a symbol of the artist himself. Painting - " Son of man", became a real masterpiece of the entire concept of the "magical realist" Rene Magritte, giving rise to many discussions and variations of reading. Even for a society where the modernist perception of the world and religion has become the norm, such use of symbols in the picture can be called an intellectual provocation. When contradictory conclusions arise in the viewer in his own head.

Despite the external primitivism in the technique of execution, the artist and his images become a very noticeable figure in the culture of Europe. His works and their symbolism become recognizable in society. Magritte's portrait appears on the 500 Belgian francs banknote.

Paintings by René Magritte:


1928-1929


1936

1967 - Magritte died of pancreatic cancer.

Rene Magritte. Clairvoyance (self-portrait). 54 x 64.9 cm. 1936. Private collection. Artchive.ru

There is not a drop of posing in the art of Rene Magritte. He does not “interest” the viewer with the help of his mysterious paintings. Instead, he urges thinking.

A painting that is pleasing to the eye is not art for Magritte. She is completely empty for him.

Today, encyclopedias identify Magritte as an outstanding surrealist. The master probably wouldn't like it. He eschewed psychoanalysis and disliked Freud.

Having once severed creative ties with Andre Bretton (theorist of surrealism), he forbade ever calling himself a surrealist.

He became the pioneer of magical realism. Magritte was generally a free artist, not ready to give up his freedom in the name of recognition. Therefore, he wrote only what mattered to him.

Starting point controversy

Rene was born on November 21, 1898 in the city of Lessines (Belgium). A short time later, three more brothers were born.

A happy childhood ended for the future artist at the age of 14. In 1912, his mother drowned herself in the river. Seeing how the townspeople pulled out the lifeless body of his mother, young Rene tried to understand the reason for what happened. He always believed in the power of thought. You just need to try very hard, and then the mind will find the answers.

Today, art historians argue about the influence of childhood tragedy on the painter. Some believe that it was under the auspices of this drama that a series of paintings depicting mermaids appeared. True, Magritte’s mermaids are the opposite: with a fish top and a human bottom.

Rene Magritte. Collective invention. 1934 Art Collection of North Rhine-Westphalia, Düsseldorf. Wikiart.org

Others, without denying the influence of this dark page of biography, are still inclined to see the nature of talent in the very personality of the artist.

R. Magritte. Portrait. 1935 MOMA, New York

He was a real dreamer. He came up with unprecedented games and entertainment. But Rene's romantic mindset was alien to his brothers. They never managed to become family.

Who knows, maybe this is a portrait of one of his brothers. Which reflects the cool relationship between people related by blood.

Do you see the eye in the bacon? I think you have to dislike a person, to put it mildly, in order to paint such a portrait of him.

Lifelong love

But his wife, Georgette Berger, became a truly close person to him. They met as teenagers. And having met by chance in the botanical garden as adults, they never parted again.

Georgette was his muse and best friend. Magritte dedicated more than one of his paintings to her, and she dedicated her entire life to him.

Only one story darkened their family life. After 13 years of marriage, Magritte became interested in another woman. Georgette took revenge on him by having an affair with his friend. They lived apart for 5 years.

For some reason, it was during this period that Magritte painted this portrait of Georgette.

Rene Magritte. Georgette. 1937 Museum of Fine Arts, Brussels. Wikiart.org

This portrait especially looks like a postcard. Such openness is characteristic of almost all of Magritte’s paintings.

In 1940, the couple reunited again. And they never parted.

After the death of her husband, Georgette recalled that to this day, looking at his paintings, she talks to him and often argues.

Magritte did not want to embody his love as some kind of cliché. In an effort to get to the essence of this feeling, he creates the canvas “Lovers”. In it, the faces of young people are wrapped in sheets.

Rene Magritte. Lovers. 54 x 73.4 cm. 1928. Museum of Modern Art (MOMA), New York. Renemagritte.org

This work is striking in its anonymity. We don't see the characters' faces. Such impersonality was characteristic of almost all of the artist’s works.

Even if there were no veils on the faces, the facial features were blocked by an ordinary object. For example, an apple.

Rene Magritte. Son of man. 116 x 89 cm. 1964. Private collection. Artchive.ru

Recognition and civic duty

In 1918, the young man graduated from the Royal Academy of Fine Arts. Having left the threshold of the “alma mater”, he began to painfully search for a means of subsistence.

He could not go against his idea, adapting to the tastes of the public. Therefore, I got a job in a wallpaper painting workshop.

It is difficult to imagine a sadder contradiction: the artist, who most of all tried to capture a thought, was forced to paint flowers on the wallpaper.

But Rene continued to write in his free time. The heroes of his paintings are ordinary objects. Or rather, the ideas hidden behind them.

There is a series of paintings of denial, where the artist deliberately draws, for example, a pipe and leaves the signature: “This is not a pipe.” Thus drawing attention to what is behind the usual shell of the object.

Rene Magritte. The Treachery of Images (This is not a pipe). 63.5 x 93.9 cm. 1948. Private collection. Wikiart.org.

Each painting by Magritte is a witty independent story. The components of the canvas do not spread or deform. They are realistic and recognizable.

But in the compositional totality they form some completely new thought. The master claimed that each of his paintings had a special meaning “wired” into it. No pointless clutter.

What, for example, is the point of a rain of people? The artist himself never deciphered his paintings. Everyone is looking for hidden subtext for themselves.

Rene Magritte. Golconda. 100 x 81 cm. 1953. Private collection, Houston. Artchive.ru

In 1927, Rene's first exhibition opened, which was not a critical success. And the Magrittes couple leaves for Paris, the capital of avant-garde art.

After a short collaboration with the Bretton circle, the artist chooses his own path and quickly achieves success.

Contemporaries recall that Rene was different from all artists. He never had his own workshop. And in the house where Magritte lived, there was no disorder characteristic of the painter. Magritte said that paint was created to be applied to the canvas, and not to be smeared on the floor.

However, his paintings were just as “clean” and even a bit dry. Clear lines, perfect shapes. Extreme realism turning into illusion.

Rene Magritte. Conditions of human existence. 1934. Private collection. Artchive.ru

With the onset of the war, Magritte began to paint paintings that were not typical of his style. Art critics will call this time the “” period.

Rene believed that it was his civic duty to paint life-affirming images, giving the viewer hope. The dove of peace with a tail of flowers is a striking example of Magritte’s “military” art.

Rene Magritte. A favorable sign. 1944. Private collection. Wikiart.org

Achieved immortality

After the war, Magritte returned to his usual style, thinking a lot about the topic of death and life.

Suffice it to recall his parodies of famous paintings by other artists, where he replaced all the heroes with coffins. This is how the painting “Balcony” looks like in Magritte’s interpretation.

Rene Magritte. Perspective II: Manet's Balcony. 80 x 60 cm. 1950. Museum of Fine Arts, Ghent. Artchive.ru

Magritte recognizes the greatness of death before thought. These people, real people who once posed for Edouard Manet, are no longer alive. And all their thoughts disappeared forever into oblivion.

But did Magritte manage to cheat death? His wife Georgette claimed yes! He is alive in his paintings, in the riddles-rebuses that each one carries within itself. And calling on the viewer to find their answer.

After the artist’s death from pancreatic cancer in 1967, Georgette until the end of her days kept untouched everything that belonged to her talented husband - brushes, palette, paints. And on the easel there was still an unfinished painting “Empire of Light”.

Rene Magritte. Empire of Light. 146 x 114 cm. 1950s. Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice.

For those who do not want to miss the most interesting things about artists and paintings. Leave your e-mail (in the form below the text), and you will be the first to know about new articles on my blog.