Unified State Exam Statistics. Federal news When will the results of the exam in physics appear?
Preparation for passing entrance tests to all faculties of Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov, to other universities, for the Unified State Exam (USE), State final certification of 9th grade graduates (GIA) and an essay on literature. Enrollment of students in grades 11, 10 and 9 for the 2017/18 academic year. Classes are taught by teachers
Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov. High level of preparation of applicants.
Results of the Unified State Exam>>
Results of the Unified State Exam 2017.
The main period of the Unified State Examination 2017 took place from May 29 to July 1. About 703 thousand people took part in the exams, of which about 617 thousand people were graduates of the current year.
Participants in the exam Russian language became almost 617 thousand people. Russian language is traditionally the most popular subject taken by Unified State Exam participants. The Unified State Examination in the Russian language is one of the compulsory subjects for obtaining a certificate of secondary general education. The minimum number of points to obtain a certificate is 24 points. In addition, the results of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language must be presented upon admission to a university for any field of study (specialty). Universities do not have the right to set the minimum passing threshold for this subject below 36 points.
The average score on the Unified State Exam in Russian in 2017 is comparable to last year’s result. The minimum threshold for obtaining a certificate of 24 points was not overcome by 0.5% of exam participants (in 2016 their number was 1%).
Total participation in the Unified State Exam in basic level mathematics this year 543 thousand people were accepted. The average score on the Unified State Exam in basic mathematics in 2017 differs slightly from the result of last year: it was 4.24 points (in 2016 – 4.15 points).
The results of the Unified State Examination in basic level mathematics demonstrated a reduction in the number of participants who failed to overcome the minimum barrier to obtain a certificate (get at least 3 points out of 5). In 2017, their number decreased to 3.4% from 4.6% a year earlier.
In the Unified State Exam specialized mathematics About 391 thousand participants took part. The established minimum score in mathematics at the profile level was 27 points. The average score of participants increased by almost 1 point compared to last year and amounted to 47.1 points. The number of participants who failed to meet the minimum threshold of 27 points decreased by 1%.
The most popular elective exam is social science. During the main period, about 318 thousand participants took the Unified State Examination in social studies.
Preliminary results of the Unified State Examination geography indicate that the average score of the participants did not change significantly, the increase was 1 point - up to 55.1 points, which is comparable to 2016. The number of participants who failed to pass the minimum score of 37 points in this subject decreased to 9.3% from 13% in 2016. In total, about 14 thousand people took the Unified State Exam in Geography this year during the main period.
Unified State Examination results computer science and ICT also comparable to last year's results. The average score increased by almost 3 points - to 59.2 in 2017 from 56.6 in 2016. The number of participants who did not pass the minimum threshold of 40 points decreased by 2.5% - to 9.3% (in 2016 - 12.4%). The total number of participants in the Unified State Exam in computer science was about 53 thousand people.
Unified State Examination physics More than 155 thousand participants took the test. The established minimum score for the Unified State Exam in Physics is 36 points.
Unified State Examination literature More than 41 thousand participants took the test. The established minimum score for the Unified State Exam in literature is 32 points.
Exam biology About 112 thousand people took the test. The number of exam participants who failed to overcome the minimum threshold of 36 points decreased to 18% from 18.3% in 2016. The established minimum score for the Unified State Exam in biology is 36 points.
Application for participation in the written examination English language About 76 thousand people applied. Written exam in German language during the main period, 1.8 thousand participants wanted to take the test, according to French– more than 1 thousand participants, according to Spanish– 179 participants. The established minimum score for the Unified State Exam in foreign languages is 22 points.
About 76.5 thousand participants submitted applications to take the oral part of the Unified State Examination in English on both scheduled days. About 2 thousand participants wanted to take the German language, about 1 thousand - about 1 thousand, Spanish - about 200 participants. The established minimum score for the Unified State Exam in a foreign language is 22 points.
History About 110 thousand participants took the test. The established minimum score for the Unified State Examination in history is 32 points. The number of Unified State Examination history participants who failed to overcome the minimum threshold of 32 points decreased by 2 times compared to last year and amounted to 8.7%.
According to the head of Rosobrnadzor Sergei Kravtsov, in the next academic year it is planned to conduct mandatory history tests in grades 5, and voluntary tests in grades 6. Perhaps the test will also be mandatory for 11th graders who did not choose history to take the Unified State Exam.
Chemistry rented out about 74 thousand. The established minimum score for the Unified State Exam in chemistry is 36 points.
Source: Data from the website of the Official information portal of the Unified State Exam from June 1 to July 1, 2017.
Results of the Unified State Exam 2016.
Based on the results of the Unified State Exam in 2016, Rosobrnadzor prepared a document that clearly reflects the dynamics of passing the Unified State Exam compared to 2015, the range of test scores in all subjects, and also presents many other statistical data:
Among the features of this year's examination campaign, the Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Dmitry Livanov named a significant increase in graduates' interest in passing natural science subjects. Also, according to him, the level of preparation of Unified State Examination participants for exams has generally increased, which was manifested both in an increase in the average test score in a number of subjects and in a significant decrease in the number of those who were unable to overcome the established minimum level.
Results of the Unified State Exam 2015.
On June 29, the head of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science, S.S. Kravtsov, summed up the preliminary results of the 2015 exams at a press conference at the Situation and Information Center on the Unified State Examination.
Unified State Exam 2015 statistics:
The average test score in nine subjects increased compared to last year.
In 2015, the Unified State Exam was held in 85 constituent entities of the Russian Federation and in 52 foreign countries (for schools at embassies, military units of the Russian Federation and others).
In total, 725 thousand people took part in the Unified State Exam (in 2014 - 733,368), of which 650 thousand people were graduates of the current year (in 2014 - 684,574).
To conduct the Unified State Exam, 5,700 PES were organized (5,872 in 2014).
More than 20,000 people were accredited as public observers.
To ensure the transparency of examination procedures, an additional 150 federal inspectors and 2 thousand federal observers were sent to some regions. Monitoring of exams on the SMOTRIEGE.RF portal was carried out by over 10,000 on-line observers.
The most popular elective subjects, as last year, were:
- social studies (passed by 51.2% of Unified State Exam participants);
- physics (22%);
- history (20%);
- biology (17.4%).
The total number of 100-point students in all USE subjects in 2015 is 3,922 people (in 2014 - 3,705 people).
Thanks to the functioning of a multi-level system designed to ensure objectivity and transparency of the Unified State Exam and the prevention of violations, this year it was possible to avoid Unified State Exam tourism, leaks of control measuring materials and many other problems that accompanied the Unified State Exam in previous years.
Source: official website of Rosobrnadzor http://obrnadzor.gov.ru
IN THE ARCHIVE OF THIS PAGE:
Results of the Unified State Exam 2014
Based on materials from the press conference “Unified State Exam 2014: final data”, held on July 2, 2014 at the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation:
The number of those who failed compulsory subjects (Russian language and mathematics) in 2014 decreased by 24% compared to 2013.
The number of 100-point students has decreased threefold.
This year the minimum score for compulsory subjects has been lowered. If this had not happened, 28,000 students would not have received their diplomas.
From the materials of the July press conference on the results of the Unified State Exam 2014, held in Rosobrnadzor:
Average test score in Unified State Exam subjects in 2014 and 2013.
Read more on the official website of Rosobrnadzor:
http://www.obrnadzor.gov.ru/ru/press_center/news/index.php?id_4=4132
Results of the Unified State Exam 2013
Average test score of Unified State Exam participants by general education subjects in 2013.
Source: Official information portal of the Unified State Exam ege.edu.ru
Results of the Unified State Exam 2012
(based on materials from a press conference with the participation of the head of Rosobrnadzor L.N. Glebova. Source: Official website http://obrnadzor.gov.ru)
Statistics of results and features of the event:
In total, 843,766 people took part in the main stage of the Unified State Exam. Of these, 712,383 were school graduates in 2011.
3.25 percent of this year’s graduates (25,068 people) did not pass the final state certification. Last year there were 2.5 percent of such guys.
The number of appeals about results has increased - more than 71,000. Of these, 40 percent were satisfied with a change in the result. However, the number of appeals about violations of the Unified State Examination procedure has decreased - only 19 cases.
Among the features of the Unified State Examination in 2012, L.N. Glebova noted the tightening of requirements for exam reception points, the introduction of a ban on the carrying and use of mobile phones, the emergence of new degrees of protection for CMMs, the organization of operational control over the Internet space, etc.
Minimum number of Unified State Examination points in 2012:
English language – 20 points;
Biology – 36 points;
Geography – 37 points;
Computer science and ICT – 40 points;
Spanish – 20 points;
History – 32 points;
Literature – 32 points;
Mathematics – 24 points;
German language – 20 points;
Social studies – 39 points;
Russian language – 36 points;
Physics – 36 points;
French – 20 points;
Chemistry – 36 points.
Scores of USE 2012 participants:
Mathematics
Russian language 
Literature 
Physics 
Chemistry 
Biology 
Geography 
Story 
Social science 
English language 
French 
German 
Spanish 
Computer science 
Results of the Unified State Examination in 2011 >>
2011 Unified State Exam results by subject
Russian language
The minimum Unified State Exam score in Russian is 36.
The average Unified State Examination score in Russian is 60.02.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in Russian in 2011 was 760,618.
4.1% did not achieve the minimum score.
The number of hundred-pointers is 1437.
Mathematics
The minimum Unified State Exam score in mathematics is 24.
The average USE score in mathematics is 47.49.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in mathematics in 2011 was 738,746.
4.9% did not achieve the minimum score.
The number of hundred-pointers is 205.
Social science
The minimum Unified State Exam score in social studies is 39.
The average USE score in social studies is 57.11.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in social studies in 2011 was 280,254.
3.9% did not achieve the minimum score.
The number of 100-pointers is 23.
Physics
The minimum Unified State Exam score in physics is 33.
The average Unified State Exam score in physics is 51.54.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in physics in 2011 was 173,574.
Did not achieve the minimum score – 7.4%.
The number of hundred-pointers is 206.
Story
The minimum Unified State Exam score in history is 30.
The average USE score in history is 51.2.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in history in 2011 was 129,354.
Did not achieve the minimum score – 9.4%.
The number of hundred-pointers is 208.
Biology
The minimum Unified State Exam score in biology is 36.
The average Unified State Exam score in biology is 54.29.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in biology in 2011 was 144,045.
Did not achieve the minimum score – 7.8%.
The number of 100-pointers is 53.
Chemistry
The minimum Unified State Exam score in chemistry is 32.
The average USE score in chemistry is 57.75.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in chemistry in 2011 was 77,806.
Did not achieve the minimum score – 8.6%.
The number of hundred-pointers is 331.
English language
The minimum Unified State Exam score in English is 20.
The average USE score in English is 61.19.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in English in 2011 was 60,651.
3.1% did not achieve the minimum score.
The number of hundred-pointers is 11.
Computer science
The minimum Unified State Exam score in computer science is 40.
The average Unified State Exam score in computer science is 59.74.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in computer science in 2011 was 51,180.
Did not achieve the minimum score – 9.8%.
The number of hundred-pointers is 31.
Literature
The minimum Unified State Exam score in literature is 32.
The average Unified State Exam score in literature is 57.15.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Examination in literature in 2011 was 39,317.
Did not achieve the minimum score – 5.0%.
The number of hundred-pointers is 355.
Geography
The minimum Unified State Exam score in geography is 35.
The average USE score in geography is 54.4.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Examination in Geography in 2011 was 10,946.
Did not achieve the minimum score – 8.0%.
The number of hundred-pointers is 25.
German
The minimum Unified State Exam score in German is 20.
The average USE score in German is 48.99.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in German in 2011 was 2,746.
6.6% did not achieve the minimum score.
The number of hundred-pointers is 2.
French
The minimum Unified State Exam score in French is 20.
The average USE score in French is 62.97.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Exam in French in 2011 was 1,317.
1.2% did not achieve the minimum score.
Spanish
The minimum Unified State Exam score in Spanish is 20.
The average USE score in Spanish is 70.09.
The total number of people who took the Unified State Examination in Spanish in 2011 was 143.
1.4% did not achieve the minimum score.
The number of hundred-pointers is 0.
©I. Yu. Lebedeva
Structure of the 2017 examination paper in comparison with other years
Job typeMultiple choice
With a short answer
With deployed
answer
Number of tasks
2015,
2016
2017
2018
9
18
26
27
5
5
5
32
31
32
Completion percentages:
1 point: average percentage of completion– percentage of examinees who completed
exercise
2 points: generalized percentage
execution - sum ratio
points scored by all students, to
maximum score for the task
Completion percentages:
3 points:Part two tasks
exam paper,
requiring a detailed answer,
were considered completed if
they are given 2 or 3 points –
percentage of examinees scoring 2
and 3 points
Part 1 of the work: typology of tasks - tasks with independent recording of the answer: date 2017 - 10 tasks B 2018 - 10
tasks BInteger positive or negative
or final fraction!
Part 1 of the work: typology of tasks - tasks with independent recording of the answer: word 2017 - 1 task B 2018 - 1 task
Btask B
Part 1 of the work: typology of tasks - tasks with independent recording of the answer: numerical code 2017 - 1 task B 2018 - 1
task BPart 1 of the work: typology of tasks - tasks with independent recording of the answer: two numbers 2017 - 1 task B 2018 - 1
task BAnswer: 0.20 0.02
Part 1 of the work: typology of tasks - tasks with a short answer; changes in quantities in processes 2017 - 2-4 tasks B or P 2018
year – 2-4 assignments BPart 1 of the work: typology of tasks - tasks with a short answer to match sets: 2017 - 2-4 tasks B or P 2018
– 2-4 tasks B or PPart 1 of the work: typology of tasks - tasks with multiple choice 2017 - 3 tasks B or P 2018 - 4 tasks P
Changes in the codifier
2004 standard:Task No. 24
Task No. 24
In January inopen
bank (website
FIPI) will
published
s all 8
options
this assignment
Changes in the codifier
--
Will be added:
In task 4 – moment of force about the axis
rotation and kinematic description
harmonic vibrations.
In task 10 - thermal equilibrium and
temperature, internal energy of a monatomic
ideal gas.
In task 13 - the direction of Coulomb forces.
In task 14 – the law of conservation of electric
charge and the relationship between field strength and difference
potentials for homogeneous
electrostatic field.
In task 18 - elements of SRT (formulas from
clauses 4.2 and 4.3 of the codifier).
Please note
Part
work
Number of tasks
2017
2018
2
23
8
24
8
TOTAL:
32
32
1
Maximum Primary
point/
Percentage of total
primary score
2017
2018
32/ 64% 34/ 65%
18/ 36% 18/ 35%
50
52
Structure of the examination paper for 2017 and 2018
Leveldifficulties
Base
Elevated
High
TOTAL:
Number of tasks
Their distribution by parts of work
2017
2018
2017
2018
18
9
19
9
1 part (18)
1 part (19)
1 part (5)
Part 2 (4)
1 part (5)
Part 2 (4)
4
4
Part 2 (4)
Part 2 (4)
31
32
31
32
Distribution of tasks by sections of physics
Task distributionsections of physics
Number of tasks
Chapter
Mechanics
MKT,
thermodynamics
Electrodynamics
Optics
Service station basics
The quantum physics
and astrophysics
Total
2017
2018
9-11
9-11
7-8
7-8
9-11
9-11
4-5
5-6
31
32
By
Distribution of tasks by type of activity
Number of tasksActivities
2017
2018
20-21
20-22
Possession of basic methodological knowledge
and experimental skills
2
2
Solving problems of varying levels of complexity
8
(Part 2)
8
(Part 2)
Using knowledge in everyday life
0-1
0-1
Total:
31
32
Know-understand…., describe/explain….
2017 - 2018: task completion time
Job typeTime to complete
tasks in minutes
Short answer
3-5
Detailed response
15 – 25/ 15 – 20
Total operating time
235
Since 2011: a single scale for recalculating points
Point conversion scale - 2018??
6Point conversion scale –
2018??
22
21
48
36
65
7
26
22
49
37
67
8
29
23
50
38
69
9
33
24
51
39
71
10
36
25
52
40
74
11
38
26
53
41
76
12
39
27
54
42
78
13
40
28
55
43
80
14
41
29
56
44
83
15
42
30
57
45
85
16
44
31
58
46
87
17
44
32
59
47
89
18
45
33
60
48
92
19
46
34
61
49
94
20
47
35
62
50
96
Criteria 2017-2018: KZ
Contents of the criterionCompletely correct
solution including
correct answer (in this
case –…….) and
exhaustively true
direct reasoning
indicating observables
phenomena and laws (in this
case - .....)
Points
3Points
The correct answer is given and
2
explanation, but the solution contains one or
several of the following disadvantages:
- The explanation does not indicate or not
one of the physical phenomena is used,
properties, definitions or one of the laws
(formulas) necessary for complete correct
explanations.
(The statement underlying
explanations, not supported
corresponding law, property,
phenomenon, definition) Contents of the criterion 2017 - 2018
Points
and/or
All necessary to explain the phenomenon and
laws, patterns, but they contain one
logical flaw.
and/or
The solution contains extra entries that are not included in
decision (possibly incorrect) that are not separated from
solutions (not crossed out; not enclosed in brackets, in
frame, etc.)
and/or
The decision contains an inaccuracy in indicating one of
physical phenomena, properties, definitions, laws
(formulas) necessary for a complete correct solution
2Contents of the criterion 2017 - 2018
A solution is presented that corresponds to one of the following
cases:
The correct answer to the task question is given, and
explanation, but it does not specify two phenomena or
physical laws necessary for complete correct
explanations.
OR
patterns, but existing reasoning,
aimed at obtaining an answer to the task question, not
brought to completion.
OR
All phenomena and laws necessary to explain are indicated,
patterns, but existing reasoning leading
to the answer contain errors.
OR
Not all the phenomena necessary to explain the
laws, patterns, but there are correct reasonings,
aimed at solving the problem.
Points
1Contents of the criterion 2017 - 2018
Points
A complete solution is provided, including
the following elements:
1) the theoretical and physical provisions are written down
laws, patterns, application of which
necessary to solve the problem selected
way (in this case - …….);
2) all newly introduced in the solution are described
letter designations of physical quantities (for
except for the constant notations specified in
version of CMM, quantity designations,
used in the problem statement and standard
designations of quantities used when writing
physical laws);
3Contents of the criterion 2017 - 2018
3) the necessary
mathematical transformations and
calculations leading to the correct
numerical answer (allowed
solution "in parts" with
intermediate calculations);
4) the correct answer is presented with
indicating the units of measurement of the desired
quantities.
Points
3Contents of the criterion 2017 - 2018
Points
All necessary provisions are correctly recorded
theories, physical laws, patterns, and
the necessary transformations have been carried out. But
have one or more of the following
disadvantages:
1) Records corresponding to paragraph 2,
are not presented in full or
are missing.
AND (OR)
2) The decision contains unnecessary entries, not
included in the solution (possibly incorrect),
which are not separated from the solution (not crossed out,
are not enclosed in brackets, a frame, etc.).
2Contents of the criterion 2017 - 2018
Points
AND (OR)
3) In the necessary mathematical
transformations or calculations
mistakes were made, and/or
mathematical
conversions/calculations skipped
logical steps
AND (OR)
4) Point 4 is missing, or it contains
error (including in recording units
measurement of quantity)
2Contents of the criterion 2017 - 2018
Recordings corresponding to one of the following are presented
cases:
1) Only provisions and formulas expressing
physical laws, the application of which is necessary to solve
given task, without any transformations using them,
aimed at solving the problem.
OR
2) The solution is missing ONE of the original formulas needed
to solve a given problem (or the statement underlying
solutions), but there are logically correct transformations with
available formulas aimed at solving the problem.
OR
3) IN ONE of the initial formulas needed to solve
given problem (or statement underlying the solution),
an error was made, but there are logically correct
transformations with existing formulas aimed at
the solution of the problem.
Points
1
Codifier since 2015:
Q=5/2 pΔV !!Saint Petersburg:
YearTurnout
Average
point
Below
threshold
100
points
2015
6464
54
3,4
18
2016
6549
53
4,4
8
2017
6517
54
2,7
17
Saint Petersburg:
Categoryparticipants
Turnout
Share of works
from 61 to 80
points
100 points
Below
threshold
Graduates
schools
5587
21,74%
17
1,82%
Graduates
SPO
271
(was 93)
0,02%
0
0,74%
Graduates
previous years
659
(was
604)
1,19%
0
0,83%
6517
22,95%
17
3,39%
TOTAL
Main exam in comparison with the Russian Federation
St. PetersburgRF
Average score
54,7
53,1
Proportion of poor students
2,69%
3,78%
Proportion of those scoring from 61 to 80
points
19,65%
16,50%
Proportion of those scoring from 81 to 100
points
4,73%
4,94%
Share of 100-pointers
0,29%
0,18%
Gender
YOUTHSGIRLS
2015,
2016
76,5
23,5
2017
74,1
25,9
Results: “B” students
St. Petersburg: 2.69%Russian Federation: 3.78%
Vasileostrovsky
3,21
Seaside
3,16
Kolpinsky
3,82
Kronstadt
6,82
Resort
3,45
Results: “B” students
St. Petersburg: 2.69%Russian Federation: 3.78%
Admiralteysky
0,70%
Krasnogvardeisky
0,75%
Results: “B” students
St. Petersburg: 2.69%Russian Federation: 3.78%
Education centers
7,83
Cadets
3,27
Private schools
5,17
SPO
17,93
IDPs
8,23
Results: “high scorers”
St. Petersburg: 4.73%RF: 4.94%
Petrogradsky
9,28
Federal educational institutions
29,36
Private schools
8,62
Resort
0
Education centers
0
Cadets
0
SPO
0
Results: “hundred-point scorers”
St. Petersburg: 17Federal educational institutions
13
Private schools
2
Kirovsky district
1
Pushkinsky district
1
Results: Top schools by average score
School named afterA.M.Gorchakova
FTS
5 people
88,6
47 people
81,8
Lyceum No. 30
96 people
80,0
Presidential
Lyceum No. 239
95 people
79,9
St. Petersburg: work of the subject commission
20152016
2017
Active
experts
139
130
123
Participated in
verification
134 (96%)
127 (98%)
121 (98%)
Distribution of experts by category
20172016
2015
Leading
expert
Senior
expert
Basic
expert
Federal
expert
8
9
7
52
32
22
64
89
110
26
26
26
Third check:
201110,3%
2012
8,7%
2013
11,2%
2014
9,1%
2015
7,2%
2016
7,2%
2017
5,7%OD:
05.04
DD:
12.04
OD:
07.06
DD:
21.06
DD:
01.07
223
16
5776
507
53
Total
works
Percent
empty
forms
49% 31% 22% 53% 62%
Percent
third
checks
2,69
0
6,13
2,17 1,892015
OD
2016
OD
2017
OD
Total
rechecked
tasks
100%
100%
100%
Discrepancies between
assessment of the main
and a third expert
1 point
2
44
47,5
2 or 3 points
85
49
47,5
Discrepancies,
conditional
technical
mistake
13
7
5
Coefficient of coordination of the work of the subject commission
The consistency of the work of the subject commission is determinedSo:
- Take one job:
1) the sum of points given by one expert is considered
for this work
2) the sum of points given by others is considered
expert for this work
3) subtract 1) from 2) (or vice versa), take the module
received value (1)
4) it is considered what the maximum score could be received
the author of this work, if for the maximum score
would have completed all the tasks of Part C that I started,
those. maximum score for part C (minus maximum
points for those tasks that he did not start) (2)
5) the ratio of value (1) to value (2) is calculated
- This procedure is carried out for all work
- The average value for the entire body of work is considered.
Federal indicators
Regions,comparable
by scope of inspection
Work of the appeal commission
20152016
2017
Appeals by
points:
58
40
86
increased
27
10
9
reduced
0
1
4
left without
changes
0
3
1
rejected
34
(53%)
26
(65%)
65
(75.6%)
Indicators of mastering content elements
Content elementlearned if the percentage
execution
corresponding task
more than 50% (short or
detailed response)
Performance by topic: Russian Federation
Physics course sectionAverage %
execution
Mechanics
59,5
MCT and thermodynamics
53,3
Electrodynamics
49,2
The quantum physics
47,7
Mechanics and electrodynamics
Performance by type of activity
Kind of activityAverage % completed
2016
2017
Application of laws and formulas in
typical situations
59,5
67,1
Analysis and explanation of phenomena and
processes
58,6
63,1
Methodological skills
60,5
75,3
Problem solving
16,6
19,3
69%: Difficulties for the weak and average - not only strength, but also acceleration 22 negative, but some free
positive charges;
- the electrostatic field was confused with
electromagnetic or magnetic fields.
At the same time, as a rule, it was stated
correct explanation of interaction
charged bodies. 29 The strong coped with the average
Appeals! Exam participants:
- did not distinguish between pressure force and normal force
support reaction and, accordingly, did not see
the need to apply the third law
Newton;
- not all forces acting on the body were taken into account;
- introduced centrifugal force into consideration
inertia without proper transition to
non-inertial reference system;
- traditionally made mistakes when choosing
optimal coordinate axes and at
projecting vector quantities onto them;
- Newton's second law was mistakenly written in
vector form, assuming that the acceleration of the block
is centripetal. 30
30 The strong managed it, but the average ones are already having difficulties
- lack of understanding of the physical meaning
non-system unit of pressure measurement
(mmHg.);
- errors when writing the equilibrium condition
column of mercury through forces at the base
Newton's second law.
Significant problem of experts:
examinees often described the solution
very briefly, “condensing” the reasoning into
one or two formulas. 31 Lowest % of completion, highest percentage of appeals: 7 formulas! The correct formula with the wrong solution!
32 Two variants of the problem: one was almost never started, the other - a large percentage of correct solutions
On the official website of FIPI, in the section “Analytical and methodological materials”, “Methodological recommendations for teachers, prepared on the basis of an analysis of typical mistakes of USE participants in 2017” have been published, this is where you can find information about what was the average Unified State Exam score in physics in 2017.
Download the document.
Table 1
Average USE score 2017 in physics
155,281 people took part in the Unified State Exam in Physics in 2017, including 98.9% of current year graduates. In percentage terms, the number of participants in the Unified State Exam in Physics has not changed and is about 24% of the total number of graduates of the current year.
The largest number of Unified State Examination participants in physics is noted in Moscow (9943), Moscow Region (6745), St. Petersburg (5775), the Republic of Bashkortostan (5689) and Krasnodar Territory (4869).
The average USE score in physics in 2017 was 53.16, which is higher than last year (50.02 test points).
The minimum Unified State Exam score in physics in 2017, as in 2016, was 36 tb, which corresponded to 9 primary points. The percentage of exam participants who did not achieve the minimum score in 2017 was 3.78%, which is significantly less than the percentage of participants who did not achieve the minimum limit in 2016 (6.11%).
Compared to the two previous years, in 2017 the proportion of unprepared and poorly prepared participants (who scored up to 40 thousand points) decreased significantly.
The share of graduates demonstrating average results (41–60 points) remained practically unchanged, while the share of high-scorers (81–100 points) increased, reaching the maximum values for three years – 4.94%.
278 exam participants scored the maximum test score, which is higher than the results of the previous two years.
The maximum initial score for the work is 50.
For the Unified State Exam in Physics, the range from 61 to 100 test points is also significant, which demonstrates the readiness of graduates to successfully continue their education in higher education organizations. In 2017, this group of graduates increased significantly compared to the previous two years and amounted to 21.44%. These results indicate an improvement in the quality of physics teaching in specialized classes.
Rosobrnadzor summed up the results of the main and additional stages of the 2017 Unified State Exam. In general, statistics show that this year's graduates completed the exams more successfully than last year. About 620 thousand people took part in the Unified State Exam.
The number of poor students has halved. This, for example, happened during the history exam. In other subjects, the numbers vary, but there have actually been fewer unsatisfactory papers: in biology - by 0.3%, in chemistry - by 1.1%, in literature - by 1.5%, in physics - by 2%, in social studies - by 4%, in foreign languages - by 25%.
The number of participants who scored from 80 to 100 points in the 2017 Unified State Exam increased by 2%.
Rosobrnadzor does not lose sight of talented graduates who managed to score the highest score in three subjects at once. This year there were six such guys: two from Yekaterinburg and one each from St. Petersburg, Penza, Perm and Kurgan. In 2016, there were only three three-hundred-pointers: from Olenegorsk (Murmansk region), Kemerovo and Kirov.
The number of violations related to cheating has decreased by a quarter compared to last year. However, it “goes” not only to graduates, but also to teachers. Thus, in Ingushetia, a school director was fired for trying to help students take the Unified State Exam. In all regions, teachers are being targeted for firing for accidentally ringing the phone during the Unified State Examination, as well as for the fact that they “overlooked” the students who brought their phone to the exam. Such cases of demonstrative reprisals (even against honored teachers with twenty years of experience) sometimes cause bewilderment.
But as for scandals, this year they occurred not at the time of passing the exam, but during appeals. All over the country, Unified State Examination participants are complaining about gross non-compliance with appeal rules.
In some regions, the conflict commission decided to change the points even before the start of the procedure itself, and notified the graduates after the fact (without the right to appeal, since all the points were already included in the final document; naturally, there was no talk about the graduate’s signature next to the final grade and speech didn't work). In other cases, the organizers prevented both the filing of an appeal and the personal presence of the Unified State Examination participant at the meeting (for example, by “forgetting” to name the date or deliberately preventing the signing of documents necessary for attendance). Graduates also complained that their arguments were not taken into account, and the written justification for the appeal was refused to be filed with the case. The experts tried their best to maintain the original score, citing non-existent assessment criteria and finding fault with little things that do not affect the scoring at all. All this caused a wave of indignation among graduates and their loved ones. An appeal to the Unified State Exam hotline also did not bring results, since at the opposite end the upset parents were told that “the order of the meeting of the conflict commission will not be disputed.”
The blatant injustice towards the appellants, as well as negligence in the initial verification of the papers, is what we will remember about the USE 2017.
The Federal Service for Supervision of Education and Science has summed up the preliminary results of the 2017 Unified State Exam in social studies, literature and physics.During the main period, about 318 thousand participants took the Unified State Exam in Social Studies, the Unified State Exam in Physics - more than 155 thousand participants, the Unified State Exam in Literature - more than 41 thousand participants. Average scores in all three subjects in 2017 are comparable to last year.
The number of Unified State Exam participants who failed to overcome the established minimum threshold in subjects has decreased: in social studies to 13.8% from 17.5% last year, in physics - to 3.8% from 6.1%, in literature - to 2 .9% from 4.4% a year earlier.
“The average scores are comparable to last year’s results, this indicates the stability of the exam and the objectivity of the assessment. It is important that the number of those who fail to overcome the minimum thresholds decreases. This happens largely due to competent work with the results of the Unified State Examination, when they are analyzed and used in the work of institutes for advanced training of teachers. In a number of regions, the project “I will pass the Unified State Exam” has produced very serious results,” noted the head of Rosobrnadzor, Sergei Kravtsov.
Thanks to the use of technology for scanning participants' work at examination points, the Unified State Examination results in social studies, literature and physics were processed ahead of the deadlines established by the schedule for issuing results. Graduates will be able to find out their results a day earlier.
