Who is Bormental in a dog's heart? The main characters of "Heart of a Dog"
Characteristics and description of the main characters of M. Bulgakov’s story “Heart of a Dog” with quotes
M.A. Bulgakov’s story “Heart of a Dog” is rich in colorful and interesting characters. The heroes of the work can be divided into two groups. The first consists of Professor Preobrazhensky and his entourage. They are characterized by intelligence, honesty and decency. The second group includes Sharikov, Shvonder and other members of the house committee. They are aggressive and cruel, have very vague concepts of morality and justice, although they advocate in every possible way for its restoration.
Characteristics of Professor Preobrazhensky with quotes
Professor Preobrazhensky- one of the main characters of the story. Philip Philipovich is a brilliant doctor, a talented scientist, a “European luminary” of medicine. He lives secludedly in a Moscow apartment and is engaged in rejuvenation operations for rich and “powerful” clients. He is a representative of the old Moscow intelligentsia, a champion of high morality and humanism. He spoke out sharply against the use of brute force and coercion:
>“Tenderness, sir.” The only way that is possible in dealing with a living being. Terror cannot do anything with an animal, no matter what stage of development it is at. This is what I have asserted, am asserting, and will continue to assert. They are in vain to think that terror will help them. No, no, no, it won’t help, no matter what it is: white, red or even brown! Terror completely paralyzes the nervous system.”
“You can’t fight anyone!...You can only act on humans and animals by suggestion.”
Professor Preobrazhensky personifies the passing pre-revolutionary era and its culture. He often criticizes new government and the order that came with it:
“...until March 1917 there was not a single case... - that at least one pair of galoshes would disappear from our front door downstairs. ... In March of 1917, all the galoshes disappeared, including two pairs of mine, three sticks, a coat, and the doorman’s samovar.”
“At first there is singing every evening, then the pipes in the toilets will freeze, then the steam heating boiler will burst, and so on.”
He is entirely on the side of the old times, when “there was order” and he lived "comfortable and good." He believes that it is necessary to teach people basic culture and the devastation will disappear by itself. However, the professor's philosophy collapses when he encounters Sharikov. All his attempts to train and educate his creation lead to nothing but increasing aggression and mistrust.
Preobrazhensky repents of his failed experiment: “I ran into this operation like a third-year student.” He sees before him not a new human being, but a “resurrected” repeat offender thief Klim Chugunkin. Over time, the professor begins to understand the horror of the current situation and feels responsible for its consequences:
“I wanted to do a little experiment after I received an extract of the sex hormone from the pituitary gland two years ago. And instead, what happened, my God! These hormones in the pituitary gland, oh my God... Doctor, there is a dull hopelessness in front of me, I swear, I’m lost.”
By carrying out the “reverse” operation, the professor not only wants to protect himself from Sharikov.
“Shvonder is the biggest fool. He does not understand that Sharikov is an even more formidable danger for him than for me. Well, now he’s trying in every possible way to set him against me, not realizing that if someone, in turn, sets Sharikov against Shvonder himself, then all that will be left of him is his horns and legs!”
Characteristics of Bormenthal with quotes
Bormental Ivan Arnoldovich- one of the main characters stories by M.A. Bulgakov "Heart of a Dog". Dr. Bormenthal is Professor Preobrazhensky's assistant, assistant and friend. He is young, handsome, tall and has a fairly strong physique: “The handsome man - he was already without a robe, in a decent black suit - shrugged his broad shoulders.”
Ivan Arnoldovich is smart and well educated. Has high moral qualities, fundamentally honest and noble. He is a worthy student of Professor Preobrazhensky, treats him with great respect and admires his genius. Through the image of Doctor Bormenthal, a representative of the new generation of intelligentsia is shown.
After the experiment, he enthusiastically watches the transformation of the dog into a human. However, over time, he begins to notice in Sharikov the rapidly developing traits of Klim Chugunkin. Bormenthal, for his part, tries to reason with the insolent man and defend the professor:
“Don’t worry, Philip Philipovich. Me myself. You, Sharikov, are talking nonsense, and the most outrageous thing is that you say it categorically and confidently. Of course, I don’t feel sorry for the vodka, especially since it’s not mine, but Philip Philipovich’s. It's just harmful. This is the first time, but the second is that you behave indecently even without vodka.”
By nature, the doctor is quite quick-tempered, decisive and, if necessary, able to use force. He reacts more sharply to boorish and aggressive behavior Sharikova.
“...Be quieter than water, lower than the grass. Otherwise, you will have to deal with me for every ugly prank. It's clear?"
Bormenthal is devoted to his teacher and is ready to help in the most risky situation, regardless of the consequences.
“Then tell you what, dear teacher, if you don’t want to, I myself will feed him arsenic at my own risk. To hell with him, that dad is a forensic investigator. After all, it is your own experimental being, after all.”
Characteristics of Shvonder with quotes
Shvonder- one of the heroes of the story by M.A. Bulgakov “Heart of a Dog”; representative of the proletariat, chairman of the house committee. The author describes the hero with undisguised irony and sarcasm. He and his associates are shown prominent representatives“devastation”, which Professor Preobrazhensky so criticizes. Little is said about Shvonder’s appearance; only modest clothing and “A quarter arshin of thick, curly black hair.”
The chairman of the house committee clearly feels hatred for the class enemies represented by Preobrazhensky and Bormental. He and his comrades want to expropriate one room from the apartment; they clearly disapprove of the professor and his way of life.
“...the general meeting, having considered your question, came to the conclusion that, in general, you occupy excessive space. Completely excessive. You live alone in seven rooms."
Shvonder is a great supporter of bureaucracy. For him, having the appropriate document is vital.
“It’s quite strange, professor,” Shvonder was offended, “how do you call the documents idiotic? I cannot allow an undocumented tenant to stay in the house, and not yet registered with the police. What if there is a war with imperialist predators?
The conflict between Shvonder and Professor Preobrazhensky is a conflict between the intelligentsia and the lumpen proletarians. Shvonder and others like him stand up for the rights and freedoms of the working class, but in reality they only sow lack of culture, destruction and blind adherence to meaningless laws. They pretend to be hard workers, but in reality they are just slackers. Consider the “evening singing” that so outraged the professor.
Sharikov is interested in Shvonder from a practical point of view; for him, he is just another tenant. Shvonder is closely involved in his “education” - he instills in him the idea of a proletarian origin, the need for documents and registration, finds him a job according to his vocation, gives him the idea of writing a denunciation against the professor.
Characteristics of Polygraph Poligrafovich Sharikov with quotes
Sharikov Poligraf Poligrafovich- one of the main characters of the story by M.A. Bulgakov "Heart of a Dog". At the beginning of the story, Sharikov is just a good-natured yard dog, whom Professor Preobrazhensky picks up. He treats the dog's wound and treats him well. Sharik is happy with life.
“They care about me,” the dog thought, “very good man. I know who it is. He is a wizard, magician and magician from a dog’s fairy tale...”
As a result of an experiment on pituitary gland transplantation, Sharikov is born. At first, the professor thought that he had managed to create a human being, but it soon becomes clear that, in fact, he managed to “resurrect” the criminal Klim Chugunkin.
“You stand at the lowest stage of development,” Philip Philipovich shouted down, “you are still just an emerging, mentally weak creature, all your actions are purely bestial...”
Sharikov is immoral and stupid, he has neither honor nor conscience. He is deprived of even the rudiments of morality and nobility. My new life he starts playing the balalaika, drinking and swearing. He harasses women, damages furniture, and causes a flood in the apartment. From the dog Sharik it turned out “Such scum that it makes your hair stand on end.” Sharikov receives the support of the authorities in the person of Shvonder, who sees him as a proletarian and a full-fledged member of society. Sharikov probably only had a dislike for cats left from the dog. Shvonder finds him a job he likes - now he runs the cat catching department. But even here Sharikov shows cruelty, which is not characteristic of either animals or people.
Professor Preobrazhensky steadfastly endures the tricks of his ward and at first harbors hope for his re-education. But the dog-man's behavior is getting worse every day. Sharikov crosses all boundaries when he writes a denunciation against the professor and threatens to kill him.
“But who is he? Klim, Klim!....Here’s the thing: two criminal records, alcoholism, “divide everything”, a hat and two chervonets are gone…..A boor and a pig...”
Preobrazhensky performs a “reverse” operation and the kind, affectionate dog Sharik returns to the world again. With the words of Professor Preobrazhensky, the author draws a line, a conclusion: “Science does not yet know a way to turn animals into people.” And the real beast was not the dog Sharik, but the soulless and cruel Klim Chugunkin.
We can talk about what kind of heart Sharikov has - a dog's or a human's - in different ways, depending on the initial setting. Physiologically, it was a dog’s heart, but Professor Preobrazhensky and Bormenthal are not arguing about that. We are talking about whether Sharikov exhibits typically human character traits or whether they are part of his canine past. Of course, there are many people like Sharikov, which testifies in favor of Professor Preobrazhensky, especially since the man whose pituitary gland was placed in the dog had a disgusting character, was a thief and an alcoholic. Another thing is that, at its core, the human heart is completely different. After all, the debate is actually about whether human nature is positive or not. It can be resolved this way: initially it is inevitably positive, otherwise man could not have formed as a species, but man himself placed himself in conditions contrary to his nature, and his qualities and properties were distorted under the influence of the environment he himself created. In the framework of the dispute between Professors Preobrazhensky and Bormental, the professor is more right.
- New! watch in full
M. A. Bulgakov came to literature already during the years of Soviet power. He was not an emigrant and experienced first-hand all the difficulties and contradictions of Soviet reality in the 1930s. His childhood and youth are connected with Kiev, the subsequent years of his life - with Moscow. To Moscow...
M. Bulgakov did not see the story “The Heart of a Dog,” written in 1925, published, since it was confiscated from the author along with his diaries by OGPU officers during a search. “Heart of a Dog” is the writer’s latest satirical story. Everything, that...
SHARIKOV - the hero of the story by M.A. Bulgakov “Heart of a Dog” (1925). At the heart of this, according to the writer, “monstrous story” is a plot motif that goes back to the romantics (“Frankenstein” by M. Shelley), presented later by H. Wells (“The Island of Doctor Moreau”), by the Russians...
Bulgakov’s story “The Heart of a Dog,” subtitled “A Monstrous Story,” was not published during the writer’s lifetime. It was first published in 1968. (“Student”. London. NN 9, 10; “Fringes”. Frankfurt. N 69). In the USSR it was published in the magazine “Znamya”...
All of Bulgakov’s works, without exception, literally fascinate the reader and put before him the most difficult questions, which turns out to be not so easy to solve. Bulgakov's story "The Heart of a Dog" makes you think about man's place in the world, about responsibility...
Mikhail Bulgakov's story “The Heart of a Dog,” written in 1925 in Moscow, is a filigree example of sharp satirical fiction of that time. In it, the author reflected his ideas and beliefs about whether a person needs to interfere with the laws of evolution and what this can lead to. The topic touched upon by Bulgakov remains relevant in modern times. real life and will never cease to disturb the minds of all progressive humanity.
After its publication, the story caused a lot of speculation and controversial opinions, because it was distinguished by the bright and memorable characters of the main characters, an extraordinary plot in which fantasy was closely intertwined with reality, as well as undisguised, harsh criticism Soviet power. This work was very popular among dissidents in the 60s, and after its reissue in the 90s it was generally recognized as prophetic. In the story “Heart of a Dog,” the tragedy of the Russian people is clearly visible, which is divided into two warring camps (red and white) and only one must win in this confrontation. In his story, Bulgakov reveals to readers the essence of the new victors - proletarian revolutionaries, and shows that they cannot create anything good and worthy.
History of creation
This story is the final part of a previously written cycle of satirical stories by Mikhail Bulgakov of the 20s, such as “The Diaboliad” and “ Fatal eggs" Bulgakov began writing the story “Heart of a Dog” in January 1925 and finished it in March of the same year; it was originally intended for publication in the Nedra magazine, but was not censored. And all of its contents were known to Moscow literature lovers, because Bulgakov read it in March 1925 at the Nikitsky Subbotnik (literary circle), later it was copied by hand (the so-called “samizdat”) and thus distributed to the masses. In the USSR, the story “Heart of a Dog” was first published in 1987 (6th issue of the Znamya magazine).
Analysis of the work
Story line
The basis for the development of the plot in the story is the story of the unsuccessful experiment of Professor Preobrazhensky, who decided to turn the homeless mongrel Sharik into a human. To do this, he transplants the pituitary gland of an alcoholic, parasite and rowdy Klim Chugunkin, the operation is successful and he is born absolutely " new person» — Polygraph Poligrafovich Sharikov, who, according to the author’s idea, is collectively new Soviet proletarian. The “new man” is distinguished by a rude, arrogant and deceitful character, a boorish manner of behavior, a very unpleasant, repulsive appearance, and the intelligent and well-mannered professor often has conflicts with him. Sharikov, in order to register in the professor’s apartment (for which he believes he has every right) enlists the support of a like-minded and ideological teacher, the chairman of the Shvonder house committee, and even finds a job: he catches stray cats. Driven to the extreme by all the antics of the newly minted Polygraph Sharikov (the last straw was the denunciation of Preobrazhensky himself), the professor decides to return everything as it was and turns Sharikov back into a dog.
Main characters
The main characters of the story “Heart of a Dog” are typical representatives of Moscow society of that time (thirties of the twentieth century).
One of the main acting characters, at the center of the story, is Professor Preobrazhensky, a famous world-famous scientist, a respected person in society who adheres to democratic views. He deals with the issues of rejuvenating the human body through animal organ transplants, and strives to help people without causing them any harm. The professor is depicted as a respectable and self-confident person, having a certain weight in society and accustomed to living in luxury and prosperity (he big house with servants, among his clients former nobles and representatives of the highest revolutionary leadership).
Being a cultured person and possessing an independent and critical mind, Preobrazhensky openly opposes Soviet power, calling the Bolsheviks who came to power “idlers” and “idlers”; he is firmly convinced that it is necessary to fight devastation not with terror and violence, but with culture, and believes that the only way to communicate with living beings is through affection.
After conducting an experiment on stray dog With a ball and turning him into a man, and even trying to instill in him basic cultural and moral skills, Professor Preobrazhensky undergoes a complete fiasco. He admits that his “new man” turned out to be completely useless, does not lend himself to education and learns only bad things ( main conclusion Sharikov after studying Soviet propaganda literature - everything needs to be divided, and doing this by the method of robbery and violence). The scientist understands that one cannot interfere with the laws of nature, because such experiments do not lead to anything good.
The professor's young assistant, Dr. Bormental, is a very decent and devoted person to his teacher (the professor at one time took part in the fate of a poor and hungry student, and he responded with devotion and gratitude). When Sharikov reached the limit, having written a denunciation of the professor and having stolen a pistol, he wanted to use it, it was Bormental who showed fortitude and toughness of character, deciding to turn him back into a dog, while the professor was still hesitating.
Describing with positive side of these two doctors, old and young, emphasizing their nobility and self-esteem, Bulgakov sees in their descriptions himself and his relatives, doctors, who in many situations would do exactly the same.
The absolute opposites of these two goodies people of new times speak: himself former dog Sharik, who became Polygraph Polygraphovich Sharikov, chairman of the Shvonder house committee and other “tenants”.
Shvonder is a typical example of a member of the new society who fully and completely supports Soviet power. Hating the professor as a class enemy of the revolution and planning to get part of the professor’s living space, he uses Sharikov for this, telling him about the rights to the apartment, giving him documents and pushing him to write a denunciation against Preobrazhensky. Himself, being a narrow-minded and uneducated person, Shvonder gives in and hesitates in conversations with the professor, and this makes him hate him even more and makes every effort to annoy him as much as possible.
Sharikov, whose donor was a bright average representative of the Soviet thirties of the last century, an alcoholic without a specific job, three times convicted lumpen-proletariat Klim Chugunkin, twenty-five years old, is distinguished by his absurd and arrogant character. Like all ordinary people, he wants to become one of the people, but he doesn’t want to learn anything or put any effort into it. He likes to be an ignorant slob, fight, swear, spit on the floor and constantly run into scandals. However, without learning anything good, he absorbs the bad like a sponge: he quickly learns to write denunciations, finds a job he “likes” - killing cats, the eternal enemies of the canine race. Moreover, by showing how mercilessly he deals with stray cats, the author makes it clear that Sharikov will do the same with any person who comes between him and his goal.
The gradually increasing aggression, impudence and impunity of Sharikov are specially shown by the author, so that the reader understands how much this “Sharikovism” emerging in the 20s of the last century is new social phenomenon post-revolutionary time, terrible and dangerous. Such Sharikovs, found quite often in Soviet society, especially those in power, pose a real threat to society, especially to the intelligent, smart and cultured people, whom they hate fiercely and try to destroy them in every possible way. Which, by the way, happened later, when during the Stalinist repressions the color of the Russian intelligentsia and military elite was destroyed, as Bulgakov predicted.
Features of compositional construction
The story “Heart of a Dog” combines several literary genres at once, in accordance with the plots storyline it can be classified as a fantastic adventure in the image and likeness of H.G. Wells's The Island of Doctor Moreau, which also describes an experiment on breeding a human-animal hybrid. From this point of view, the story can be attributed to the genre that was actively developing at that time. science fiction, whose prominent representatives were Alexei Tolstoy and Alexander Belyaev. However, under the surface layer of science-adventure fiction, in fact, there turns out to be a sharp satirical parody, allegorically showing the monstrosity and failure of that large-scale experiment called “socialism”, which was carried out by the Soviet government on the territory of Russia, trying to use terror and violence to create a “new man”, born from revolutionary explosion and propagation of Marxist ideology. Bulgakov very clearly demonstrated what will come of this in his story.
The composition of the story consists of such traditional parts as the beginning - the professor sees a stray dog and decides to bring him home, the climax (several points can be highlighted here) - the operation, the visit of the house committee members to the professor, Sharikov writing a denunciation against Preobrazhensky, his threats with the use of weapons, the professor's decision to turn Sharikov back into a dog, the denouement - the reverse operation, Shvonder's visit to the professor with the police, the final part - the establishment of peace and tranquility in the professor's apartment: the scientist goes about his business, the dog Sharik is quite happy with his dog's life.
Despite all the fantastic and incredible nature of the events described in the story, the author’s use of various techniques of grotesque and allegory, this work, thanks to the use of descriptions of specific signs of that time (city landscapes, various locales, life and appearance of characters), it is distinguished by its unique verisimilitude.
The events taking place in the story are described on the eve of Christmas and it is not for nothing that the professor is called Preobrazhensky, and his experiment is a real “anti-Christmas”, a kind of “anti-creation”. In a story based on allegory and fantastic fiction, the author wanted to show not only the importance of the scientist’s responsibility for his experiment, but also the inability to see the consequences of his actions, the huge difference between the natural development of evolution and revolutionary intervention in the course of life. The story shows the author's clear vision of the changes that took place in Russia after the revolution and the beginning of the construction of a new socialist system; all these changes for Bulgakov were nothing more than an experiment on people, large-scale, dangerous and having catastrophic consequences.
In Bulgakov's story, a certain dispute arose between two outstanding minds of medicine, Professor Preobrazhensky and Doctor Bormental, about Sharikov. The operation was a success and the “dog” began to change. What will be next? Ivan Arnoldovich’s theory that the “experimental” will be able to “grow” into a full-fledged and developed personality caused obvious doubts in Preobrazhensky.
And really, can he become a human if he has the “heart of a dog”? Or does he have a human heart? But then another question arises. Why is there no kindness or gratitude in this “heart”, in a word, nothing that in any way characterizes it from the best side?
Can Sharikov be considered fully developed if all attempts to “reason” with him fail?! Of course, all these questions are more rhetorical. Polygraph Polygraphovich is not a person - he is a different form of life, moreover, arrogant, drinking and lazy.
Sharikov's behavior both in Preobrazhensky's apartment and outside it leaves much to be desired. He runs after cats, pesters women, and if she reprimands him, he bites her. The polygraph is arrogant, rude to those around him, and on top of everything else, from Sharik he inherits fleas, which he cannot get rid of.
The dispute between Preobrazhensky is not over. They couldn't come to general opinion and give Sharikov an exact name. And does a creature with low social responsibility have the right to be called a human?!
Sharikov walks on two legs, speaks, thinks, plays the balalaika - is this enough to perceive him as a full-fledged person? If so, then it will not be fair to others who are ready to love, defend their homeland, learn, have pity, forgive, explore space...
IN modern society You also come across people with a “dog’s heart,” but meanwhile they are not created artificially on the operating table. Accordingly, these individuals are not indifferent to someone. Perhaps it was for this reason that Preobrazhensky was not completely able to call Sharikov a person, and treated him like a “talking dog.”
Before this “ill-fated” operation, the professor spends five years studying the human brain. He conducts experiments, reads, and at the same time sees patients. Transplanting the pituitary gland from a person to an animal is practically the goal of his life. Therefore, seeing the result, the professor is first of all disappointed in own theory. All his teachings are in vain. There is no rejuvenation, and what happened requires that he be considered a human being, given documents, registered in an apartment...
As a result, for the professor, the dog becomes much nicer than a person with a “dog’s heart.”
With Ivan Arnoldovich, despite Sharikov’s position in society, they perform a second operation on him. After just a few months, Sharik again wags his tail affably to his owner. He is intuitively glad that his heart is not a “dog” again.
Subject of the work
At one time, M. Bulgakov’s satirical story caused a lot of talk. In “Heart of a Dog” the heroes of the work are bright and memorable; the plot is fantasy mixed with reality and subtext in which it is openly read harsh criticism Soviet power. Therefore, the work was very popular in the 60s among dissidents, and in the 90s, after its official publication, it was even recognized as prophetic.
The theme of the tragedy of the Russian people is clearly visible in this work; in “Heart of a Dog” the main characters enter into an irreconcilable conflict with each other and will never understand each other. And, although the proletarians won in this confrontation, Bulgakov in the novel reveals to us the whole essence of the revolutionaries and their type of new man in the person of Sharikov, leading us to the idea that they will not create or do anything good.
There are only three main characters in “Heart of a Dog,” and the narrative is mainly told from Bormenthal’s diary and through the dog’s monologue.
Characteristics of the main characters
Sharikov
A character who appeared as a result of an operation from the mongrel Sharik. A transplant of the pituitary gland and gonads of the drunkard and rowdy Klim Chugunkin turned a sweet and friendly dog into Poligraf Poligrafych, a parasite and a hooligan.
Sharikov embodies all the negative traits of the new society: he spits on the floor, throws cigarette butts, does not know how to use the restroom and constantly swears. But this is not even the worst thing - Sharikov quickly learned to write denunciations and found a calling in killing his eternal enemies, cats. And while he deals only with cats, the author makes it clear that he will do the same with people who stand in his way.
Bulgakov saw this base power of the people and a threat to the entire society in the rudeness and narrow-mindedness with which the new revolutionary government resolves issues.
Professor Preobrazhensky
An experimenter who uses innovative developments in solving the problem of rejuvenation through organ transplantation. He is a famous world scientist, a respected surgeon, whose “speaking” surname gives him the right to experiment with nature.
I was used to living in grand style - servants, a house of seven rooms, luxurious dinners. His patients are former nobles and high revolutionary officials who patronize him.
Preobrazhensky is a respectable, successful and self-confident person. The professor is an opponent of any terror and Soviet power, calls them “idlers and idlers.” He considers affection the only way to communicate with living beings and denies the new government precisely for its radical methods and violence. His opinion: if people are accustomed to culture, then the devastation will disappear.
The rejuvenation operation yielded an unexpected result - the dog turned into a human. But the man turned out to be completely useless, uneducable and absorbing the worst. Philip Philipovich concludes that nature is not a field for experiments and he interfered with its laws in vain.
Dr. Bormental
Ivan Arnoldovich is completely and completely devoted to his teacher. At one time, Preobrazhensky took an active part in the fate of a half-starved student - he enrolled him in the department, and then took him on as an assistant.
The young doctor tried in every possible way to develop Sharikov culturally, and then completely moved in with the professor, as it became more and more difficult to cope with the new person.
The apotheosis was the denunciation that Sharikov wrote against the professor. At the climax, when Sharikov took out a revolver and was ready to use it, it was Bromenthal who showed firmness and toughness, while Preobrazhensky hesitated, not daring to kill his creation.
The positive characterization of the heroes of “Heart of a Dog” emphasizes how important honor and self-dignity are for the author. Bulgakov described himself and his doctors-relatives in many of the same traits as both doctors, and in many ways would have acted the same way as them.
Shvonder
The newly elected chairman of the house committee, who hates the professor as a class enemy. This is a schematic hero, without deep reasoning.
Shvonder completely bows to the new revolutionary government and its laws, and in Sharikov he sees not a person, but a new useful unit of society - he can buy textbooks and magazines, participate in meetings.
Sh. can be called Sharikov’s ideological mentor; he tells him about his rights in Preobrazhensky’s apartment and teaches him how to write denunciations. The chairman of the house committee, due to his narrow-mindedness and lack of education, always hesitates and gives in in conversations with the professor, but this makes him hate him even more.
Other heroes
The list of characters in the story would not be complete without two au pairs - Zina and Daria Petrovna. They recognize the superiority of the professor, and, like Bormenthal, are completely devoted to him and agree to commit a crime for the sake of their beloved master. They proved this at the time of the repeated operation to transform Sharikov into a dog, when they were on the side of the doctors and accurately followed all their instructions.
You have become acquainted with the characteristics of the heroes of Bulgakov’s “Heart of a Dog,” a fantastic satire that anticipated the collapse of Soviet power immediately after its emergence - the author, back in 1925, showed the whole essence of those revolutionaries and what they were capable of.
Work test
