Lie detector with a lisp today. Lie detector for Dmitry Shepelev. Friske and Shepelev: who is telling the truth

Two years ago Zhanna Friske passed away. Until now, the artist’s family and her common law husband can't improve relationships. In addition, there is still talk about the disappearance of 20 million, which were collected by the Rusfond organization. The artist’s common-law husband, Dmitry Shepelev, came to the studio of Andrei Malakhov’s “Let Them Talk” program to honestly answer all the questions that concern thousands of the singer’s fans and her friends. The TV presenter agreed to have specialists test him with a lie detector.

Dmitry Shepelev admitted that he was very tired of scandals that tarnished Zhanna’s name. According to the man, he could not sleep a wink on the eve of filming the program.

“I haven’t slept, I’ll tell you honestly, and at the same time I’m experiencing great feeling gratitude for the meeting that we can have today. I'm worried, truly worried. To my horror and my incomprehension, the story of Jeanne and everything connected with her is not left alone. All this continues to be discussed and condemned,” Dmitry noted.

Shepelev noted that many questions still remain unanswered. According to the TV presenter, he came to the show to dot all the i's. The public is most concerned about the disappearance of funds from Rusfond accounts that were collected for Friske’s treatment. Let us recall that the court ordered the return of all the money to the artist’s heirs, including Zhanna’s mother and father, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich, as well as her son Platon.

“I must separately say about this money. This is special money that cannot be treated like pieces of paper, it is the equivalent of love. With this money, people all over Russia and around the world supported their seriously ill beloved girl Zhanna Friske,” Shepelev said.

The TV presenter explained that the remaining funds were supposed to go to seriously ill children in need of help. Dmitry showed statements from Rosbank accounts, where the Rufond money and the singer’s personal savings were located.

“This is a written confirmation that was used in court, confirmation that all the funds were withdrawn by her mother 10 days before her death,” Shepelev noted.

During a lie detector test, Dmitry was asked who paid for the purchase country house, which took place at a time when Zhanna was already ill. According to Shepelev, they purchased a plot for two.

“Half the house and half the land belong to me. The purchase was made jointly. The repairs were carried out with my money,” said the presenter, answering questions from specialists.

A few days before the release of the program, Andrei Malakhov met with Zhanna’s father, Vladimir Friske, to listen to his position. The artist’s father claims that Shepelev did not give a penny of money, but constantly only withdrew funds from the card.

“He’s arrogant and doesn’t consider people to be anyone at all. A man who came from rags to riches. Now he has eight guards,” noted Vladimir Borisovich.

“All accounts are empty. These are dry banking statistics,” Shepelev responded to this.

According to the journalist, Zhanna’s parents also reset their daughter’s personal accounts. “I can’t wrap my head around how, seeing your daughter dying, you can go to the bank and think about money. This is what I don’t understand,” Dmitry emphasized.

In an exclusive report, Shepelev showed the house that he and Zhanna bought. IN this moment no one lives there. According to the man, the artist herself was there twice.

Shepelev against the background of the house

“It was a remarkable day. It was winter. We had a small picnic at the entrance to the house, drank Home wine, ate barbecue, talked different stories“Dmitry recalled about the second trip to the site.

“The son was not only left without his mother due to tragic circumstances, but also due to human stupidity and greed, I was left without a home,” the TV journalist noted.

According to the latest data, the cottage now has four owners. In addition to Dmitry and Platon, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich Friske have rights to the house. “I don’t need anything that belongs to others, I want my son to live in peace,” the TV presenter noted.

Zhanna's father claims that they will go to great lengths to see their grandson more often.

“I will fight for Plato. What right does he have to take Plato from us? This is our blood there,” Friske noted.

Dmitry claims that he does not prohibit his grandparents from seeing their grandson. At the detector he honestly admitted that last meeting took place three weeks ago. “The essence of the conflict is that grandparents do not want to go to their grandson,”- Shepelev noted.

According to the TV presenter, in the future he plans to explain the current situation to the child. “Regardless of who speaks: me or Zhanna’s parents, pain speaks in us, and we must make allowances for this too. And you only need to trust your own heart and the confidence that he is needed and loved. I hope that this disgusting story will not affect him in any way,” Shepelev said.

According to the presenter, he constantly tells the boy about his mother. Dmitry would like Plato to be proud of his parents in the future.

“For Plato, the time has come for endless “whys.” I answer these questions 1000 times a day... I talk to him directly. He knows about everything: he knows his mother’s voice, he knows what his mother looks like. By the way, he was in our house and asked: “When will we live in our house?” - said Shepelev.

For Plato, his mother is still alive in songs, films and in his heart. Shepelev condemns the current situation. According to the TV presenter, the boy’s last communication with the Friske family was very tense.

“It was very difficult. After the meeting, Plato developed a fever. I called the doctor. He told me that this was an emotional reaction to this meeting. That is why I insist that a psychologist be present at the meetings,” Shepelev said.

According to Zhanna’s common-law husband, all claims were filed by the Friske family. The court decided that they could see Plato for one and a half hours a month. The mother of the deceased singer presents the whole situation differently. The program showed an excerpt from another program with the participation of Olga Vladimirovna, in which she talks about her grandson.

“We met in the psychologist’s office in the presence of the nanny, Dima. We were still protected by eight guards. It was about 30-35 minutes,” the woman recalls.

The conflict between Vladimir Borisovich and Dmitry Shepelev caused a strong resonance, when a serious fight almost broke out between them. “He looks down on people. They are like manure to him,” says Father Friske about the TV presenter.

According to Shepelev himself, he admits that the singer’s father could kill him. The TV journalist admitted this during a lie detector test. Polygraph examiner Roman Ustyuzhanin, who worked with Dmitry, commented on his answers.

“We have no questions for Dima regarding the money issue. He answered it honestly. The issue with the grandson went away on its own, because the court made a decision,” the expert said.

The program editors showed a conversation between Vladimir Fricke and Dmitry Shepelev. According to this conversation, the journalist was threatened. The TV presenter contacted law enforcement agencies, but they refused to initiate a case over his words about the murder. Dmitry does not want to deal with involving the court, as he is worried about the future of his son.

“For Zhanna’s parents, I’m like a red rag to a bull. In their eyes, I am the reason for the loss of their daughter,” Dmitry said.

At the end of the program they showed how Shepelev pleased Plato. The TV presenter prepared a surprise for the boy. Plato loves motorcycles very much and an iron horse decorated with balls was waiting for him on the street.

“I’ll tell everyone in kindergarten,” said the satisfied child.

Many were waiting for an answer to two main questions: did Dmitry really love Zhanna and did he regret that he was not with her on the day of his death. The TV journalist really cannot forgive himself for being absent at that moment. Then he and Plato flew to the sea.

“I still love her today,” Shepelev said, answering the question about his feelings for the singer.

She died two years ago. We all loved her so much. Millions were raised for the singer's treatment. The money that was supposed to save her became an object judicial trial between Zhanna’s parents, her husband Dmitry Shepelev and Rusfond. All this time, the singer’s relatives cannot share her son Plato. In the press this loud scandal dubbed the story of all-Russian deception. Until now, it has not been possible to establish which of the singer’s relatives is telling the truth and which is lying,” program host Andrei Malakhov briefly recounted the history of the conflict, which has been going on for two years now. The release of the popular program was dedicated to this topic.

Zhanna's father, Vladimir Friske, continues to accuse his son-in-law of stealing 20 million rubles collected for his daughter's treatment. According to him, with these funds Dmitry Shepelev built luxury mansion. Famous TV presenter and the common-law husband of the late artist, in turn, accuses Zhanna Friske’s parents of the missing money. In order to dot all the i’s, Shepelev agreed to take a lie detector test.

First of all, in the “Let Them Talk” studio, Dmitry complained about the fact that Zhanna’s story is still not being left alone. “People come up to me on the street and say, ‘We are for you. There are those who appeal to my conscience, saying how could I do this. I would like to end all this,” Dmitry noted.

Andrei Malakhov did not miss the opportunity to remind that his colleague, in his book published in memory of Zhanna, literally described the story of the missing money in just two lines. “Yes, I continue to insist and say that Vladimir withdrew the money. This is not just money - it is the equivalent of love for Zhanna, the fans wanted to help her so much. Therefore, every penny of these 20 million must be accounted for. According to the agreement that Zhanna herself concluded with Rusfond, all the money that remained after her treatment, even in the event of her death, was to be used for the treatment of seriously ill children,” emphasized the common-law husband of the late artist. At the same time, Dmitry presented papers confirming that all 20 million were withdrawn from the singer’s account ten days before her death by her mother.

Answering questions while connected to a polygraph, Dmitry Shepelev answered absolutely honestly that the scandalous Vacation home was acquired in equal share ownership with his wife, and further repairs of the property were carried out exclusively at the expense of the leader himself. Dmitry denied any spending of money provided by Rusfond for his own needs. But the singer’s father, Vladimir, continued to insist that Dmitry “went from rags to riches, didn’t spend a penny on Zhanna and only demanded money from her.” Also, Plato’s angry grandfather said that he wanted to give his grandson the house, for which he had already drawn up documents as the heir to his daughter’s property, but now “it would be better to let the Tajiks in there.”

As for Plato, a lie detector showed that Dmitry Shepelev does not prohibit his son from seeing his grandparents: “Their dates are scheduled by the court. But even before the trial, I did not forbid them to communicate. I even insisted that they see each other more often. But Zhanna’s parents don’t want to go to their grandson, they want me to take him like a dog to them out of town.” In addition, the polygraph denied rumors that Shepelev did not visit his wife during last six months. Zhanna's father himself agreed to take a lie detector test, but did not find the time due to his too busy schedule.

Dmitry Shepelev proved that he does not prevent Plato from meeting his grandparents

One of the main premieres of the new television season in Russia was the show “Actually,” hosted by Dmitry Shepelev. The rating program has already become the center of attention and various accusations. AiF talked with Shepelev about how the polygraph works on the program and whether it is possible to lie during the show.

Vladimir Polupanov, AiF: Dima, what is it? main idea"Actually" program?

Dmitry Shepelev: The key idea is to separate truth from lies. This talk show began as a confrontation between once close people, whose relationship was broken, but not completely broken, by lies, as an opportunity for the first time in for a long time talk frankly, ask vital questions important questions and get truthful answers. It is impossible to lie in our studio - the characters are connected by sensors to the polygraph. This turns every program into psychological thriller. The truth that we learn can separate people forever or, on the contrary, connect them again, because even they do not always understand what is really happening between them. Today we have expanded the topics of the programs: the format allows us to talk not only about personal matters, but also to conduct our own investigations of high-profile criminal and political events.

I feel in the right place. The events of the last few years have literally turned my life upside down. There were a lot of lies around, a lot of betrayal and hypocrisy. Condemnation of the crowd. Therefore, I, like no one, know how important it is sometimes to find out the truth, to explain to the world, how important it is to be heard.

By the way, I myself suggested being the first to take a polygraph test and answer the questions that our “colleagues” have been savoring for many years now. And after that I think that I have every right ask frank questions of my guests. I'm very proud of this program. Over the summer, we managed to beat the ratings not only of our old direct competitors (18% share - Ed.), but also the ratings of our new rivals - former colleagues on Channel One.

- I heard that it is still possible to fool the detector. The whole question is how to answer the questions.

I don't know how to fool the detector. I think this is impossible. Before recording the program, our heroes undergo preliminary polygraph testing. It's a long process. And only in the studio during filming we finally find out which of what they said is true and which is a lie. This is not a detector game, but verified and reliable information. People's fates are often at stake. Playing with this is blasphemy. And we value our reputation. To make it clearer, I will give an example. Let's say someone stole family jewelry. The heroes are not only asked: did you steal this? They also ask a lot of additional questions. Have you been to this house? Do you know where the jewelry was kept? Have you touched them? From many answers an irrefutable truth emerges, so it is impossible to deceive the polygraph. Even if someone manages to “skip” the first question, additional ones will still lead to clean water. Therefore, polygraph examiners often do not immediately make a verdict, but ask additional questions.

By the way, the hero is observed not only by a polygraph examiner - a specialist in working with the polygraph, but also by a profiler who analyzes the emotions, facial expressions of the program hero, his speech, signs invisible to an inexperienced observer, by which one can always understand whether a person is lying or telling the truth. Sometimes they are joined by a criminologist - a specialist who works with the motives of crimes. Believe me, if our specialists take on a guest, he will not get out. It is impossible to lie.

- How do you manage to persuade people to participate in the program? What technologies do you use?— torture, blackmail, bribery?

No matter how loud and pathetic it may sound, the desire to be heard is much more important for many than anything else. People want to defend their truth, and we help them with this.

You yourself have been in a similar position and you understand that it is very difficult to open up and tell the details of your personal life in front of a large audience.

Yes, for me, the polygraph test and the need to talk about personal things became a severe shock. The first such interview was dedicated to the release of my book “Zhanna” last fall. And the second is on the eve of the airing of the project “Actually”. It was damn difficult. But I had the main help - the truth is on my side. Therefore, agreeing to this conversation was not easy, but telling the truth turned out to be a great relief. Psychologists know how reticence and lies destroy human destinies.

- But you probably pay people money for participation?

Do you really think that money is the decisive argument for our man? Achieving justice is a much stronger motive. For example, the famous 87-year-old actor became the heroes of one of the programs Ivan Krasko and his wife Natalia, who is 60 years younger than him. Surely you’ve heard what the hell they write about these people, what labels they put on them - it’s no joke, such an age difference.

Actor Alexey Panin participated in one of the first programs. After everything this man has done (sex with a dog, walking naked on the streets in women's pantyhose and masturbation), doesn't he make you feel disgusted? Why give broadcasts to such people?

Speaking about me, the last few years have changed me a lot, I, in principle, try not to judge or condemn. In addition, within the framework of the program, I am not interested in moralizing - it is not for me to decide what is good and what is bad. My personal task is to try to understand the guest. And if a criminal comes to the studio, I will ask: why? And I'll try to hear him. This does not mean to justify. I didn't ask Alexey Panin about the origin of the scandalous videos. The topic of the program was different, more important and deeper, in my opinion. There is an insurmountable conflict between Alexei and his wife that was worth trying to resolve. They have common child- A 10-year-old girl who, like any child, deserves to grow up in peace and harmony. And for her sake, they agreed to talk, tried to hear each other. This is what I see as my task.

- And How? Did this conversation help them?

They left the studio separately. They failed to hear each other. But! Panin answered fundamental questions using a polygraph: whether his shocking lifestyle poses a danger to the child. Did his daughter witness his drunken antics? No, I wasn't. And it was worth it.

- I got the impression that sometimes the truth harms relationships, aggravates them.

One of the guests of the program was an actor Konstantin Glushkov. He is raising a son, whose existence he only learned when the boy was 4 years old. He wanted to know if he had been raising his own child all these years. I asked him more than once: “Are you sure you want to know the whole truth? Can the truth really change your attitude towards your son?” “I want to,” he said. Found out. The son is not his. Glushkov could not restrain himself and jumped out of the studio. It seemed to me that he would simply kill his wife. But behind the scenes they reconciled. I agree, a difficult truth for both of them. But lies were already destroying their family, and the truth opened the way to understanding.

I am convinced that television should remain socially relevant. In my opinion, the story of the “crystal boy” Sashi Pushkareva more important than history expensive gifts for Anna Kalashnikova. Because it appeals to the heart, because it is an example of perseverance, an example of dignity!

One of the episodes of our program was dedicated to our adopted daughter Irina Ponarovskaya. For 33 years this girl lived with the conviction that her adoptive father Wayland Rodd (ex-spouse Ponarovskaya) beat her. She cannot provide any evidence, but she claims: Wayland Rodd beat me. And she lives with this all her life. Rodd took a polygraph. And it turned out - he didn’t hit! He never beat her, but was an attentive and caring father to her, and her memories are the fruit of a child’s fantasy. I'm proud of this dramatic program. Because it is about responsibility, about education, about attitude towards children. And she lifted such a heavy burden from both Wayland and his adopted daughter.

We called Dibrov after the recording you mentioned. We talked for a long time. I agree with Dmitry’s arguments: the topic can be anything everyday - “silicone and Botox”, unequal marriage, betrayal, rape, illegitimate children. It's all vital. But our task is television, as I see it, and the skill is to make life story not washing dirty linen, but literature. By the way, I came across an idle opinion: any conversation about the secret is equated with yellowness. And I don't agree with this. There's nothing more valuable on television than real-life honesty, especially when it comes to truth and lies and how they change lives.

It seemed to me that the story of Prokhor Shyalyapin had already been sucked up so many times that it could no longer be of interest to television. The viewer is given the false impression that the man who is often called “gigolo and gigolo” is positive hero, since it is used so often on television. By inviting him to the program, you are giving him free PR.

In our program Chaliapin And Kopenkina passed the polygraph. We talked about Prokhor’s childhood and discovered: his mother and himself were beaten by his father, his father was imprisoned, the boy actually grew up without a father. Further more. At 10 years old own home he witnessed the murder of two relatives, his aunt and grandmother.

- And now he takes revenge on other women for this?

I believe that nothing passes without a trace. And the Prokhor we see on the screen today, with his high-profile novels and odious antics, he comes from a difficult, painful childhood. When Larisa Kopenkina first heard these facts from her biography in the studio ex-husband, she admitted that she looked at him with different eyes, was able to understand why he left her so inexplicably, why he generally acts so recklessly with other women. Our program featured more than just dramatic story, it was true. So it was worth it. Chaliapin and Kopenkina, after a long time of misunderstanding, asked each other for forgiveness, hugged and left the studio together. This is the incredible value of what is happening for me.

We will move along the path of separating truth from lies, no matter what you call it: scandalousness or social responsibility. We talk about topics that will not leave you indifferent. Rape Diana Shurygina, Lyudmila Porgina and a dramatic accident Nikolai Karachentsov. A lot has been said about all this. And only we said what actually happened to these people.

- Since we are talking, what do you think about Andrei Malakhov’s transition to the Russia 1 channel?

I entrusted Andrey with the most important interview in my life about Jeanne, about our Plato, about why I keep this personal so carefully, how important it is for me, why I protect my son with all my might. Today I understand: by declaring that he will “help his grandson meet his grandfather,” Andrei is acting professionally, but inhumanly.

youtube.com

TV presenter Dmitry Shepelev underwent a lie detector test specifically for filming the talk show “Let Them Talk.” The release of the program was timed to coincide with the two-year anniversary of the death of his ex common-law wife- singer Zhanna Friske. All this time, the country was rocked by scandals associated with Shepelev and Friske’s parents: either father Vladimir Friske said that Shepelev left Zhanna for another woman even before her death, then he accused the presenter of their meetings with his grandson Plato, then he claimed that It was Shepelev who strangely withdrew 20 million rubles from the deceased singer’s card.

Youtube.com

Shepelev agreed to undergo testing with a detector in order to put an end to the rumors that had not allowed him to live in peace all these two years. The broadcast showed how the TV presenter was tested. According to the agreement that Friske herself drew up with Rusfond, all the money that remained after her treatment (even in the event of death) was to be used to treat seriously ill children. Shepelev claims that the entire amount was withdrawn from the account 10 days before Zhanna’s death by her mother. The polygraph confirmed that Dmitry is not lying.

Youtube.com

In addition, the showman said that he never prevented the parents of his late wife from seeing their grandson, as they claim. The essence of the conflict is that the grandparents do not want to go to their grandson, but ask that he be brought to them.

Now their dates are scheduled by the court. But even before the trial, I did not forbid them to communicate. But Zhanna’s parents don’t want to go to their grandson; they want me to take Plato, like a dog, to them out of town.

During a lie detector test, Dmitry was asked who paid for the purchase of a country house, which took place at a time when Zhanna was already ill. According to Shepelev, they purchased a plot for two. Thus, half of the house and half of the land belong to him, the other half to Zhanna Friske. Partial repairs to the house were made with Shepelev's money. However, he cannot move there: the rights to the second half of the building were transferred to her parents after Zhanna’s death - and they are against Shepelev living there.

1tv.ru

One of the questions to Shepelev from the experts was: “Are you afraid that Vladimir Friske will kill you?” Shepelev thought for a few seconds and confidently answered: “Yes.” Indeed, on the air of “Let Them Talk” there was an audio recording of a conversation between Shepelev and Vladimir Borisovich, during which the latter shouted into the phone: “Otherwise I will order you!” I swear I'll order it! I’m not afraid of anything anymore!” By the way, my father, Vladimir Friske, was also invited to the program to take a lie detector test. At first the man agreed, but then stated that his schedule did not have time for this.

Many in the studio admitted that Vladimir Borisovich was clearly in a borderline state, and allowing little Plato to communicate with a person with such frayed nerves was indeed fraught. At the end of the broadcast, viewers asked Shepelev whether he really loved Zhanna and whether he regretted not being with her on the day of her death. The TV journalist admitted that he still regrets that he was absent on the day of her death - then he and Plato flew to the sea to Bulgaria. Answering a question about his feelings for the singer, Dmitry admitted: “I still love her today.”

• Conversations that Shepelev met with someone else during Zhanna Friske’s life existed before. So, on the air of one popular talk show with an unexpected statement spoke friend of the singer Alena Kravets. She stated that Shepelev cheated on his fiancee, the mother of their common son Plato. According to the woman, he took a mistress while the singer was still alive. True, she refused to provide any evidence for her words.

• The total amount of donations for Friske, a brain cancer patient, amounted to 69.2 million rubles. At Zhanna’s request, 32.6 million were sent to pay for the treatment of nine children with cancer.

• Russian legislation does not allow charitable foundations longer than a year keep targeted donations in your bank accounts. Therefore, the money to continue treatment - the remaining 25 million - was transferred to the singer’s personal bank account under an agreement with her. Friske’s relatives refused to provide Rusfond with documents confirming that the donations were used to pay for medical services.

For two months, Dmitry Shepelev has been testing stars with a lie detector in the show “Actually.” TV viewers received the project with a bang, Shepelev’s ratings are good, which means that the “Actually” team competently selects and builds the dramaturgy of the TV show.

True, guests are not always happy with what happens behind the scenes “In reality”.

the site publishes the star behind the scenes of the TV project.

1. Singer Aziza participated in the release of the program, which was dedicated to the death of Igor Talkov. Dmitry Shepelev, with the help of guests in the studio, tried to understand the details of the tragedy that happened on October 6, 1991 at the Yubileiny Sports Palace in St. Petersburg. When the show’s experts asked Aziza in the finale of “Actually” what she was keeping silent about, the artist replied that she was honest. Although the polygraph determined that she was not speaking. “Aziza has information that she is hiding, but which was not asked,” the experts said. Aziza tried to justify herself, and the presenter concluded that the case of Igor Talkov remained unsolved.

In an interview after recording the TV project, Aziza said: “I personally don’t care about the polygraph. Moreover, all this is profanity and show. Both the presenter and the experts play roles in a well-directed production. Igor Talkov Jr. asked me to come there, we are friends, and I came. But for some reason he was never called to the studio. This is disrespect not even for Igor, but for the memory of his father.”

2. Few people believe Nikita Dzhigurda, so he recorded all his conversations with the editors of the television project and then partially made them public. From telephone conversation showman with a representative of the program, you can clearly hear the phrase: “They want to call you to the detector, write everything down...” But Dzhigurda refuses: “I don’t want to be a whipping boy...”

Despite his scandalousness, Dzhigurda communicates with celebrities, including those who participated in “Actually.” “A script is written in advance, to which the answers that editors need for ratings and earning money are tailored to... They don’t care about truth and truth! “People eat” - that means (from their point of view) everything is cool! And they don’t give a damn about crippled destinies!” — the TV show Dzhigurda emotionally exposes. Who else but Dzhigurda and Anisina (frequent guests of scandalous TV shows) knows that the show often prescribes topics of conversation in advance, sometimes discusses the answers, edits...

3. The singer Danko’s common-law wife, according to his confession, was paid 150 thousand rubles for participating in “Actually.” In a conversation with a reporter for the site, Danko talked about the behind-the-scenes of the TV show: “...I was given the role of a bastard, I played it. I spoke clearly from the text; such a thing could not have occurred in my head. Invented foreigners who even technically cannot exist - Natasha’s passport does not contain any exits or entries, except for hospitals. (The program discussed in detail the possible infidelities of Danko’s wife - editor’s note.) And what questions did they shove in?! Moreover, at first they agreed on some, and then last moment others slipped it in."

The main complaint because of which Danko decided to make public the behind-the-scenes of the TV project was the fact that the editors who invited the singer to the broadcast did not fulfill their obligations: “They promised to give the card number on the air, to announce the collection of money - I don’t know by what methods. But the emphasis was on this. We had to agree to their “jaundice” in order to help the child: we need a lot..." Youngest daughter Danko (Sashi Fadeeva) is disabled, the child has several serious diagnoses, so money for treatment is constantly needed.

4. Diana Shurygina turned 18 years old and was able to pass a polygraph test, although no sensations happened on air. The imminent wedding (October 5) of Diana and the Channel One cameraman was already known at that time. Previously, Diana Shurygina’s fees for participating in a talk show were announced (200 thousand rubles per program).

Diana Shurygina’s opponent on air was the sister of Sergei Semenov, convicted of rape, Ekaterina. This is what she said immediately after recording the program: “Before going into the studio, we were tested on a detector. When Diana passed, we sat in the next room and heard her answers that it was true and that it was false. Throughout the program, she constantly avoided answering. Then she started a game: “I remember, I don’t remember.” When it’s convenient, I remember, when it’s not, I don’t know, I don’t remember. Either she could walk or she was unconscious. When the experts got tired of her leading them by the nose, they asked for accurate answers. To which she, in her usual style, began to throw a tantrum, tear off the wires from the detector and leave. The organizers, realizing that the filming was on the verge of failure, began to ask the experts to be loyal to Diana and stop pressuring her. After this, answers in the form: “I don’t remember, I don’t know, maybe” began to be accepted and in the end it turned out that everything she said was true. Diana's happiness knew no bounds, she tried to show that she was crying, actually covered her face and laughed, which she was able to deceive. Later, the organizers said, we need a “swing” - Seryozha is right, Diana is right, in order to maintain the interest of the audience and raise the rating of the program. The filming lasted 4 hours; it is unknown what will be left there after editing. Just so you understand, the script was written long before we took the polygraph.”

5. Polygraph is a technical tool for conducting psychophysiological studies in which parameters of breathing and cardiovascular activity are simultaneously recorded. Is the machine always right?

Our question was answered by star psychologist Evgeniy Voltov: “On many projects, I studied the results of lie detector research and I can say with confidence that the polygraph gives flaws. Honesty to the heroes of the “Actually” program is enhanced by responsibility to the audience federal channel, and the graphics on the screen are more likely to build up intrigue. Don't forget: this is a show, not documentary. And then, imagine a situation in which the detector made a mistake. A person would ask to double-check this! This is a natural reaction to being accused of lying!”