General impression of what fathers and sons read. My first impression of reading the novel “Fathers and Sons”

To the question my opinion about the novel Fathers and Sons asked by the author ____THE BEST BOY____ the best answer is It seems to me that the problem of “father and children” in the novel is only a reason for conflict, and the reason is that fathers and children were representatives of different ideas. Already describing the heroes, Turgenev contrasts Bazarov’s dirty robe, which the owner himself calls “clothes,” with Pavel Petrovich’s fashionable tie and ankle boots.
It is generally accepted that in communication between Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov, complete victory remains with the latter, and yet a very relative triumph falls to Bazarov’s lot. Both Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich can be accused of loving to argue. Kirsanov talks about the need to follow authorities and believe in them. And Bazarov denies the rationality of both. Pavel Petrovich claims that only immoral and empty people can live without principles. But Evgeniy believes that principle is an empty and non-Russian word.
Kirsanov reproaches Bazarov for contempt for the people, and he says that “the people deserve contempt.” And if you trace throughout the work, there are many areas in which they do not agree. So, for example, Bazarov believes: “A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet.”
I believe that Bazarov is right that any truths of authority should be questioned. But at the same time, he should not forget about his attitude towards past culture, about the culture of their ancestors, and Bazarov completely rejects everything that is coherently connected with the past. For him this is the truth modern science, modern natural science. Bazarov denies all historical values. He despises Pavel Petrovich’s admiration for art and criticizes their attitude towards love. Challenging the old generation, the hero goes too far. He creates a problem for himself, and by denying art, which is close to Pavel Petrovich, he denies all art. The same thing happens with the attitude towards love, principles, etc.
The author, comparing characters and life positions Bazarov and Kirsanov shows the problem of “fathers and sons” in disputes. In a dispute, truth is born and Turgenev wants to convey this truth to the reader. Turgenev tries to show that the positions of Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich are extreme: in one we see remnants of the past, and in the other intolerance. Thus, the truth eludes the disputing parties: Kirsanov lacks understanding, and Bazarov lacks respect for his parents.
So, we have two absolutely different heroes. And the author will emphasize their differences throughout the novel. From the first pages it is clear that the author portrays Bazarov more nice person than Pavel Petrovich. Bazarov cannot be repeated and at the same time there is something from each of us in him. This is a man of considerable intelligence, who has his own point of view and knows how to defend it.
Based on the above, we are convinced that the hero’s position is especially evident in disputes. In them we're talking about about an irreconcilable conflict not so much between “fathers and sons”, but between aristocrats and democrats.
The author describes another hero in his novel - Arkady, presenting him as a like-minded person of Bazarov. But from my point of view, Arkady is a person who has a different point of view than Bazarov. Arkady is very similar to his father, he wants to seem like an adult, to be like Bazarov. But in fact, Arkady needs no more than his father: quiet native home, loving wife, beloved children. And this desire overpowers the thought of Bazarov’s idea of ​​​​universal happiness. Nikolai Petrovich is like that.
Most likely, Arkady will repeat his father’s path after Bazarov leaves his life with his ideas. Arkady, in the eyes of Bazarov, is a “weapon,” a “soft liberal gentleman.” Bazarov does not want to accept and acknowledge the kindness of Arkady, the dreaminess of Nikolai Petrovich, their love for music and poetry. He denies all this, so there is no understanding between Arkady and Bazarov, a discord arises that concerns not only their beliefs, but also the values ​​that they value. This is where the gap between past and present occurs.

Once again, walking between the shelves of the city library, I realized that I did not want to waste time on detective stories, romance novels or modern bestsellers. I wanted something Russian, thoughtful, and I approached the classics. Wandering my gaze through the books, I stopped at Turgenev and realized that I did not remember at all what the work “Fathers and Sons”, which we once studied as part of the school curriculum, was about. I only remember that I didn’t really understand it and then it seemed terribly boring to me.

This time the book was read from cover to cover, including a review of this work Pisarev called "Bazarov".

I don’t know why, but I increasingly want to know how people lived before, when there were no televisions, computers and multicookers. Moreover, specifically after this work, I wanted to read Russian history written in those days. I'll ask Karamzin next time in the library.

Plot "Fathers and Sons"

The work begins with the fact that an old father (Nikolai Kirsanov) meets his student son (Arkady Kirsanov) on the road.

But it turns out that Arkasha is not traveling alone, but with a friend, Evgeny Bazarov. Arkasha is under his great influence, looks into his mouth, considers him his teacher, but Bazarov is not to the taste of his relatives, especially his aristocratic uncle Pavel Kirsanov.

Due to differences in the views of youth and the views of the older generation, a conflict ultimately occurs. The external one is between Bazarov and Kirsanov, and the internal one is in Bazarov’s soul. After all, he, such an unprincipled “nihilist,” managed to... fall in love. Who! A lady who will give him a head start in his unscrupulousness!

How will this story end? I won’t spoil it, I’ll just say that there won’t be any sweetness or vanilla.

The main characters of "Fathers and Sons" by Turgenev

And yet, I want to introduce readers to the main characters and even show them through illustrations from the book.

• Evgeny Bazarov

In my opinion, this person can be respected only for one quality - incredible performance. A future doctor, he already studies daily natural Sciences, in practice and in theory. He can already provide high-quality medical care. Bazarov grew up in modest conditions, but as a child he had everything he needed. I would also like to note the fact that Evgeniy did not burden his parents during his studies and did not ask them for money.

Bazarov does not recognize authorities, spits on customs and morals, but this would be nothing if he were not rude to people. Sometimes he seems to me to be simply an ill-mannered person who covers up his cultural gaps with the philosophy of nihilism. He does not understand music and art, and therefore denies them. He has never loved, so he denies love. He dismissively calls bright feelings like friendship and love “romance” or “nonsense.” He is rude to people, openly calls his friends fools and keeps them close to him as a retinue of admirers. The conflict in his soul occurs when he falls in love. His belief system breaks down and now he is dumbfounded and notices that he, too, is becoming a romantic. And in this regard, he tries to escape.

Perhaps she is much worse than Bazarov. This is a very smart and calculating woman who did not disdain marrying an old man in order to inherit his fortune. Now she lives with his wealth: softened, bored, with no meaning in life. But when she meets Bazarov, she becomes interested: what kind of bird is this interesting?

At the end of the work, it seemed to me that Anna would thaw when she saw Bazarov, but no. She came only to verify her frigidity and lack of feelings.

Arkady Kirsanov and Katerina Odintsova

Arkady Kirsanov is a very gentle, kind and romantic person. Last six months is carried away by Bazarov's ideas, but his inner nature rebels against these very ideas. And we recognize him in the end as a man of the old school: he loves to listen to music, dream, be jealous, he is capable of love, tenderness, and compliments. At the same time, he is honest and open to people.

Kate, younger sister Anna is a person with a core. She is soft, beautiful, but knows how to bend her line and subjugate. Katya is not spoiled by life.

• Pavel Kirsanov

This is Bazarov's antagonist. The man is aristocratic, bilious, but for me he doesn’t represent anything. Yes, he is educated, smart, well-mannered, but his life was in vain. It’s true that he did something worthy of respect. He fell in love, but abandoned his love for the benefit of a loved one.

• Fenechka

This heroine remains a mystery to me. Personally, it seemed to me that this was a wolf in sheep's clothing. Now she is so sweet, submissive, kind, open, fearful and simple. But for now she is NOBODY. But there is a marriage with a nobleman ahead, and how she will show herself is still unknown. Why do I doubt her? She behaved too freely with Bazarov, I would say that she herself provoked him. Perhaps in the future she will become very similar to Anna Odintsova, because she is not marrying someone of the same age, but a man old enough to be her father.

• Bazarov's parents

I can only sympathize with these characters. They raised a bastard who didn’t give a damn about everyone and everything. I just feel sorry for the old people.

But they loved Bazarov more than anyone in the world.

Love in I.S. Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons"

The book shows us 2 types of love.

Lyubov Bazarova is furious, tough, passionate. When he showed his feelings, even Odintsova felt unwell and scared.

Arkasha's love is soft, compliant, spiritual. This is the case when friendship and mutual understanding appear first, and then the feeling of falling in love.

It is from the second type of love that strong marriages. I believe that such relationships are not boring. Thanks to them, you go home as if into a fortress, and don’t wait - what kind of tsunami awaits you this evening.

The meaning of the novel Fathers and Sons by I.S. Turgenev

In my opinion, I.S. Turgenev wanted to tell the reader the following.

Yes, there will always be a difference in views between the generation of fathers and children. And there is no escape from this. The world is developing. But there are immutable principles that will allow father and child to understand each other. First of all, it is love. Love is that feeling that helps those who love to compromise, to put up with shortcomings, which will close their mouths when they need to remain silent in order to avoid quarrels and offenses, which will give eloquence when they need to support each other with words.

It is the feeling of love that will provide a sick parent with a glass of water in old age.

And yes, if you have read this far, then now is the time to call your parents and just say a few kind words to them.

My opinion about Bazarov.

Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" was written in 1861.
This novel first appeared in the magazine "Russian Messenger" in 1862.
Critics assessed this novel differently.
DI. Pisarev said: " New novel Turgenev gives us everything that we are accustomed to enjoying in his works."
But another critic, M.A. Antonovich, said that “Mr. Turgenev’s new work is extremely unsatisfactory artistically.”
No matter how this novel is criticized, I believe that in it I.S. Turgenev fully reveals current topic not only of his time, but of all generations. The author cannot calmly watch how “fathers” and “sons” constantly argue, so he writes a novel in which, as mentioned above, he reveals this topic. Main character novel "Fathers and Sons" - Evgeny Vasilyevich Bazarov. This is a man tall, with a long and thin face, “with a wide forehead, flat at the top, a book-pointed nose, large sandy sideburns.” The face "was enlivened by a calm smile and expressed self-confidence and intelligence." Bazarov studies medicine and loves natural sciences and chemistry.
The reader first meets Bazarov in the scene of Bazarov and Arkady’s arrival at Arkady’s home. Arkady Nikolaevich Kirsanov is a friend and student of Evgeny Bazarov.
Bazarov meets Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov, Arkady's father, and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, Arkady's uncle.
Arkady answers his uncle's question: "What is Bazarov?" He says that Bazarov is a nihilist, that is, “a person who does not bow to any authorities, who does not accept a single principle on faith, no matter how much respect this principle is surrounded.” This means that Bazarov is a person who denies everything. Having read this scene where Arkady tells his uncle and father about Bazarov, I still don’t really understand Bazarov himself. I cannot understand what it means to deny everything, what kind of person Bazarov is.
Next, the author explains to us what Arkady wanted to say about Bazarov.
Bazarov was a lover of women, but “in the romantic sense he called love nonsense, unforgivable foolishness, and considered knightly feelings to be something like ugliness or disease.” He denied love.
TO to the common people Bazarov treats him with respect. He sees the people deeply, is able to be with them, believes that the people are equal to them, because he himself comes from the people. Bazarov wants people to learn. At Arkady Bazarov's house he meets the peasants. They talk to him as equals. But when Bazarov arrived at his home, the peasants did not understand him, they laughed at him, because for them Bazarov was a gentleman. They didn't understand what he wanted.
In the Kirsanovs’ house, Bazarov always argued with Pavel Petrovich. They have completely opposite views. It even comes to a duel. Pavel Petrovich does not want to put up with Bazarov. He is looking for any excuse to challenge him to a duel.
I first met Bazarov. He seemed to me a rude, soulless person who did not recognize anything.
But, reading the novel further, I began to understand that Bazarov is not at all what he wants to seem.
Bazarov fell in love with Anna Sergeevna Odintsova. In conversations with her, he tried to show his indifference and contempt for everything romantic, and when left alone, “he was indignantly aware of the romanticism in himself.” Love changed him. He never thought that he could truly fall in love, but he did. Bazarov became more humane, began to care more about other people.
He even began to treat his parents differently.
Previously, he did not like the tenderness of his mother, did not like the fact that his parents were “shaking” over him. But after he fell in love, he began to understand what love is.
As soon as Turgenev began to show Bazarov’s changes, Bazarov immediately dies. And he dies because of just one scratch. He becomes infected with typhus. Thus, the author wants to tell the reader that great people like Bazarov die quickly, without having time to do everything they wanted. Other people take their place, and this continues from generation to generation.
Having read the novel to the end, I discovered a new Bazarov. I realized that Bazarov is a purposeful, grounded person. Despite the fact that Bazarov was a nihilist and denied all principles, he still had them. He hates “aristocrats”, lives according to calculation, guided by attraction, denies empty talk, recognizes people who achieve everything through their work. Bazarov loves the people for their originality, but despises them for their ignorance. He stands for honest people in society. These are all Democratic principles. It is not for nothing that the author himself said about Bazarov that he is “honest, truthful and a democrat to the core.” I agree with Turgenev. And that's why I like Bazarov. If he is a democrat, he will be one until the end of his life. And what I also like about him is that he saw changes in himself and did not deny them.
Turgenev said that when he wrote Bazarov, he felt admiration for him. And when I wrote the scene of his death, I sobbed bitterly. And these were not tears of pity, but traces of an artist who saw the tragedy of a person in whom part of his own ideal was embodied.
Turgenev did not believe that the Bazarovs would be able to lead Russia further, but he also did not believe that the Pavel Petrovichs could do this.
The author wanted to take the positive from some and from others and believed that this was what could give impetus to the development of Russia. But many did not understand him. It turned out that Turgenev himself had to reveal the main idea of ​​the novel.
So, how complex and beautiful novel created by Turgenev, that he is not so easy to understand. But the author just showed a life that cannot be changed. From this we can conclude that our life is not as easy as it seems.
And Turgenev is a wonderful author who was able to so skillfully reflect complex life situations.
Not every writer can do this.
Therefore, we need to thank Turgenev for his talent, for his love for the people, for whom he tried to write his work, so that they would learn from the mistakes of the heroes and would not repeat these mistakes in their lives.

This novel is from school curriculum. Never known for diligence, for some reason I read this novel and I admit, it left an indelible mark on my heart... When I read the last lines I couldn’t help myself: tears were welling up. I remember I sat down and cried heartily)) it was a pity young Bazarov and poor parents...

I like the style in which the novel is written. Turgenev very accessible, intelligibly and interestingly describes all the events taking place in the novel, while reading the novel, pictures of existence involuntarily appear before your eyes, a model of relations in the society of that time emerges... "Fathers and Sons" is more than a realistic story of one family. Nothing new. Just people different generations suddenly they “shrink” and are faced with eternal problems. The appearance of Bazarov in the Kirsanovs' house is like a catalyst in order to sharpen one's view of the problem of views of different generations.

I don’t want to talk much about the already common name of the problem “fathers and sons”. everyone knows it, everyone has encountered it at least once. “Children” run ahead of their fathers after progress, forgetting traditions, and “fathers” stubbornly do not want to take advantage of the new products of this progress and change their views that have developed over the years. In general, this topic is always relevant. The fact that now we accept all innovations, especially scientific ones, gadgets, as progress, in the 18-19 centuries even new views different from traditional ones were akin to this very progress.

The author shows how Russia is changing, how such “Bazarovs” are capable, at least partially, of modifying the views of their environment. Even though Arkaky, his comrade, still moved away from nihilistic thoughts, because he was too “soft and a liberal barchin,” but he moved away, but his thoughts were still renewed (he became a wonderful manager of his estate and farm)... so did the Elder Brother. Nikolai Petrovich, who at first received the new guest with hostility, after a demonstration duel, suddenly became imbued with respect for him and considered that Bazarov was not such a bad person... I just want to say: “The renewal of the “brains” is proceeding at the right pace...” . if it is sharper, there will be a revolution, but the people are maturing and quietly coming to something new, more meaningfully, having matured, so to speak. In the right proportions, keeping traditions and new thinking in mind.

Bazarov, like a bright flash, like a bolt from the blue, appeared brightly, “brainwashed” as best he could and disappeared... Everyone thinks that he is really an ardent nihilist, denying all power and traditions, but in his soul, it turns out, Quite a romantic young man. These new thoughts, mental torment do not give him peace: what he denied, what he taught everyone, suddenly turns out to be in him (tender feelings, romance, sentimentality) and he cannot do anything about it... How painfully Bazarov perceives refusal from Odintsova, who, like him, easily refuses him and denies his feelings...

Using the example of the main character, he finds himself on both sides of the barricade. Conflicting thoughts, awareness of hopelessness, when he cannot control himself and his thoughts and feelings devastate this person, and due to inattention and absent-mindedness, he dies very stupidly... And only old decrepit parents remember him and come to him every time... but for others he remained a bright flash, a spot....

Using the example of this small and quite ordinary family, reflects the mood of society. People's worldview is changing: the more active and daring, driven by their ideas, break forward, bending the weaker ones under them. But even the strongest and most daring always has a weak point, because no one is invulnerable. No matter how Bazarov scoffed at traditions, no matter how ardent a nihilist he considered himself, meeting a woman who awakened real feelings in him changed not only his views, but also his life, which he had to rethink.

But there have always been and will be conflicts between generations. Children are the engines of progress, and parents are the keepers of traditions. This is how the world works harmoniously. This is simply the law of social development, without which there is no progress, no evolution...