Comparative characteristics of Onegin and Hermann. Comparative characteristics of Evgeny Onegin and Grigory Pechorin (Comparative analysis)

The similarities between Onegin and Pechorin are difficult not to notice, just as it is impossible to ignore the differences in their characters. Both of them - " extra people"of his time. Even V. G. Belinsky, comparing these two images, noted: “Their dissimilarity is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora... Pechorin is the Onegin of our time.”
Despite the difference in eras in which the images were created - Onegin in the era of Decembrism, freethinking, in the era of dreams and hopes for a quick transformation social order, Pechorin - during the brutal Nikolaev regime that followed the defeat of the Decembrist uprising - both of them are dissatisfied with life, do not find use for their remarkable strengths and are therefore forced to waste time. Neither one likes it social order, but both of them are passive, do not take any action to change it. Both Pushkin's Onegin and Lermontov's Pechorin personify spiritual crisis noble intelligentsia, who expressed their dissatisfaction with life by refusing social activities and, not finding use for her powers, she wasted her life fruitlessly.
Both Onegin and Pechorin belong to the same social environment. Both of them are educated. Both at first accepted life as it was, enjoyed it, using the privileges of the high society to which they belonged, but both gradually came to deny the light and deep dissatisfaction with the life of society and their own too. Both began to understand that this life was empty, that behind the “external tinsel” there was nothing worth it, boredom, slander, envy reigned in the world, people spend internal forces souls to gossip and anger. Idleness and lack of high interests trivialize their existence. “But his feelings cooled down early,” says Pushkin about his hero. We read approximately the same thing in Lermontov, where the author reports that his hero very early “was born of despair, covered with courtesy and a good-natured smile.”
The fact that both heroes are smart, educated people, undoubtedly, further aggravates their conflict with society, because these qualities allow them to see all the negative sides, all the vices. This understanding seems to elevate Onegin and Pechorin above the young people of their generation; they do not fit into their circle.
What makes the heroes akin is the fact that they both succeeded in the “science of tender passion,” and the fact that neither one nor the other were able to surrender to love with all their hearts and souls. A great, all-consuming passion, for which many were ready to give their lives, could not touch our heroes: in their relationships with women, as with the world, there was coldness and cynicism. Onegin considered love to be “satiated pride” that is unworthy of him. Pechorin's love consisted of achieving power over his beloved. He could only take, but was not able to give. He never allowed himself to fall in love without reciprocating feelings. For him, seeking someone’s love is the height of baseness: “...When meeting a woman, I always unmistakably guessed whether she would love me... I never became a slave to the woman I loved; on the contrary, I have always acquired invincible power over their will and heart... is it because I never value anything very much...” Not knowing how to love, Onegin and Pechorin did not value the love of others - hence Onegin’s coldness towards Tatyana, and unrequited love Bela and Princess Mary to Pechorin.
He who cannot truly love is incapable of true friendship, and vice versa. So, Onegin kills his friend Vladimir Lensky, although, as the eldest in age and wise with experience, he could dissuade the passionately in love poet, blinded by jealousy. But he did not do this - disappointed with life, despising his own existence, he was not able to sufficiently value the lives of others. Can't find it common language, having met many years later, and Pechorin with Maxim Maksimych. Kind, gentle and simple-minded, Maxim Maksimych could not explain Pechorin’s cruelty, could not understand what was guiding the actions of his former colleague. Yes, it couldn’t be otherwise: the old soldier was like everyone else, he was part of a society that Lermontov’s hero despised, with which he, an extraordinary person, was simply bored. It was not for nothing that he always strove for people who could argue with him.
Personal freedom and independence for both heroes is the best thing that can be in life, to which they are ready to prefer everything else. It is not for nothing that Onegin, remembering the past, writes in a letter to Tatyana:
I didn’t want to lose my hateful freedom.
Pechorin declares on this occasion: “Twenty times I will put my life, even my honor, on the line, but I will not sell my freedom.” Realizing that life is wasted, Lermontov’s hero does not value it at all. Freedom comes first, honor comes second, and life comes last.
We find the meaning of Pechorin’s behavior and actions in the diary of the hero in the story “Princess Mary”. Reading it, you realize that Pechorin is a victim of his time. He lost faith in people, in ideas, and this is the result of the era that came after the defeat of the Decembrist uprising, an era of moral poverty, vulgarity and cowardice. All this can be attributed to Onegin.
V. G. Belinsky said very well when comparing the two heroes: “The roads are different, but the result is the same.” Despite the external dissimilarity, despite the difference in character, both are “superfluous people” who were ahead of their time and therefore did not find a common language with their contemporaries, unable to express and realize themselves.

    Theme of Lermontov's novel "A Hero of Our Time" (1840) - image social situation 30s - 40s of the 19th century. This period in the history of Russia is usually called “inter-time”, because society was experiencing a so-called change of ideals. Decembrist revolt...

    Many writers of different eras and peoples sought to capture their contemporary, through him conveying to us their time, their ideas, their ideals. What is he like, a young man from different eras? Pushkin in the novel "Eugene Onegin" depicted a young man...

    My life, where are you going from and where are you going? Why is my path so unclear and secret to me? Why do I not know the purpose of labor? Why am I not the master of my desires? Pesso Pushkin worked on the novel "Eugene Onegin" for many years, it was his favorite work....

    The novel “A Hero of Our Time” was a continuation of the theme of “extra people”. This theme became central to the novel in verse by A. S. Pushkin “Eugene Onegin”. Herzen called Pechorin Onegin's younger brother. In the preface to the novel, the author shows his attitude towards his...

What a short period of time separates Pushkin's Onegin and Lermontov's Pechorin! The first quarter and forties of the 19th century. And yet these are two different eras, separated by an unforgettable event for Russian history - the Decembrist uprising. Pushkin and Lermontov managed to create works that reflected the spirit of these eras, works that touched upon the problems of the fate of the young noble intelligentsia, who did not know how to find application for their strengths.

Herzen called Pechorin “Onegin’s younger brother,” so what do these people have in common and how do they differ?

Onegin, before becoming a “young rake,” received a traditional upbringing and an extensive, but rather superficial education. Because he could eventually speak French “perfectly,” dance the mazurka easily, and “bow easily,” “the world decided that he was smart and very nice.” However, quickly fed up with the fruitless bustle of social life, Onegin begins to be burdened by it, but finds nothing in return. Realizing the worthlessness of the existence of secular people, Onegin begins to despise them, withdraws into himself, and indulges in the “Russian blues.” Living only by himself, without taking into account the feelings and experiences of other people, Onegin commits whole line unworthy actions. By the time he met him, Pushkin noted in Onegin “inimitable strangeness,” “a sharp, chilled mind,” “involuntary devotion to dreams,” an internal gap and misunderstanding between him and the people around him. Despite his deep contempt for the “society,” Onegin remains dependent on public opinion, and as a result kills his friend Lensky. Selfishness leads the “rake of the ardent” to severe emotional drama and I’m at peace with myself.

We don’t know much about Pechorin’s past, mainly from the pages of his own diary, from his conversations with other people. We learn that Pechorin’s “soul is spoiled by light”: “From childhood, everyone read on my face signs of bad qualities that were not there; but they were anticipated - and they were born.” Now, those around him often do not understand either Pechorin’s thoughts or his actions, and he (and often quite justifiably) considers himself head and shoulders above those around him. Unlike Onegin, Pechorin does not shy away from people, does not avoid contact with them, but, on the contrary, becomes an extremely subtle psychologist, capable of understanding not only other people’s actions and thoughts, but also feelings. Unfortunately, communication with him most often brings people and even himself only suffering and dissatisfaction. Unlike Onegin, Pechorin is not yet tired of life, he interferes in everything, is interested in many things, but he is not capable of truly loving and making friends. And if only Tatyana suffers from Pushkin’s love for Onegin (and later from Onegin’s love), then Pechorin brings misfortune to all the women he encounters: Bela, Vera, Princess Mary, even the smugglers’ friend. Material from the site

Onegin's problem is his inability to make his life interesting, bright, and fill it with significant events. Pechorin is concerned about the question of the goal own life, its meaning. The consciousness of lost opportunities constantly haunts him, since his belief in his “high purpose” does not find real confirmation. Both one and the other value their freedom, liberty, but it turns out that they too often sacrifice to it what is truly dear to them.

The differences in the destinies and characters of the heroes are explained by differences in eras: the life of Russia on the eve of the December uprising (Onegin) and the severe political reaction after the defeat of the Decembrists (Pechorin). Both Onegin and Pechorin belong to the type of “superfluous people,” that is, people for whom there was neither place nor work in the society around them. And yet, even despising their surroundings, Onegin and Pechorin were children of this society, that is, heroes of their time.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page there is material on the following topics:

  • differences between Pechorin and Onegin
  • comparative characteristics of Onegin and Pechorin
  • comparative characteristics of Onegin and Pechorin
  • Onegin and Pechorin value their freedom and not being attached to anything
  • What is the difference between Rudin and Onegin, Pechorin and Oblomov?

“Their dissimilarity is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora... Pechorin is the Onegin of our time.”

V. G. Belinsky.

Onegin and Pechorin are representatives of a certain historical era. In their deeds and actions, the authors reflected the strength and weakness of their generation. Each of them is a hero of his time. It was time that determined not only them common features, but also differences.

The similarity between the images of Evgeny Onegin and Grigory Pechorin is undeniable. Origin, conditions of upbringing, education, character formation - all this is common to our heroes.

These were well-read and educated people, which placed them above other young people in their circle. Onegin is a metropolitan aristocrat with a rich inheritance. This is a person with a very complex and contradictory nature. He is talented, smart and educated. Evidence of Onegin’s high education is his extensive personal library.

Pechorin is a representative of the noble youth, a strong personality, there is much that is exceptional and special about him: an outstanding mind, extraordinary willpower. Possessing significant abilities and spiritual needs, both failed to realize themselves in life.

In their youth, both heroes were fond of carefree social life, both succeeded in the “science of tender passion”, in the knowledge of “Russian young ladies”. Pechorin says that when meeting a woman, he always unmistakably guessed whether she would love him. It only brings misfortune to women. And Onegin did not leave a very good mark on Tatiana’s life, not immediately sharing her feelings.

Both heroes go through misfortunes, both become responsible for the death of people. Both Onegin and Pechorin value their freedom. The indifference to people characteristic of both, disappointment and boredom affect their attitude towards friendship. Onegin is friends with Lensky because there is nothing better to do. And Pechorin says that he is not capable of friendship, and demonstrates this in his cold attitude towards Maxim Maksimych.

It becomes clear that there are differences between the heroes of the novels by Pushkin and Lermontov. Onegin is an egoist, which, in principle, is not his fault. The father paid almost no attention to him, giving his son to tutors who only praised the guy. So he grew into a man who cared only about himself, about his desires, not paying attention to the feelings and suffering of other people. Onegin is not satisfied with the career of an official and a landowner. He never served at all, which sets him apart from his contemporaries. Onegin leads a life free from official duties.

Pechorin is a suffering egoist. He understands the insignificance of his position. Pechorin counts himself among their pitiful descendants, who wander the earth without pride and convictions. The lack of faith in heroism, love and friendship deprives his life of values. He does not know why he was born and why he lives. Pechorin differs from his predecessor Onegin not only in temperament and willpower, but also in the degree of his attitude towards the world. Unlike Onegin, he is not just smart, he is a philosopher and thinker.

Both Onegin and Pechorin, disillusioned with the lives around them, go to a duel. However, everyone has their own reason. Onegin is afraid of public opinion, accepting Lensky's challenge to a duel. Pechorin, shooting with Grushnitsky, takes revenge on society for unfulfilled hopes.

Fate sends Lermontov's hero test after test, he himself seeks adventure, which is important. This attracts him, he simply lives for adventure. Onegin accepts life as it is, goes with the flow. He is a child of his era, spoiled, capricious, but obedient. Pechorin's disobedience is his death. Both Onegin and Pechorin are selfish, but thinking and suffering heroes. Because by hurting other people, they suffer no less.

Comparing the descriptions of the heroes' lives, one can be convinced that Pechorin is a more active person. Onegin, as a person, remains a mystery to us.

But for us these heroes remain interesting and important, as possessors of high human virtues.

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ONEGIN AND PECHORIN

(Advanced people XIX century)

My life, where are you going from and where are you going?

Why is my path so unclear and secret to me?

Why do I not know the purpose of labor?

Why am I not the master of my desires?

Pushkin worked on the novel “Eugene Onegin” for many years; it was his favorite work. Belinsky called this work “an encyclopedia of Russian life” in his article “Eugene Onegin.” Indeed, this novel gives a picture of all layers of Russian life: and high society, and the small nobility, and the people - Pushkin studied well the life of all layers of society early XIX century. During the years of writing the novel, Pushkin had to go through a lot, lose many friends, and experience the bitterness of death the best people Russia. For the poet, the novel was, in his words, the fruit of “a mind of cold observations and a heart of sorrowful observations.” Against a broad background of Russian paintings of life, life is shown dramatic fate the best people, the advanced noble intelligentsia of the Decembrist era.

Without Onegin, Lermontov's "Hero of Our Time" would have been impossible, because the realistic novel created by Pushkin opened the first page in the history of the great Russian novel XIX century.

Pushkin embodied in the image of Onegin many of those traits that were later developed in individual characters of Lermontov, Turgenev, Herzen, Goncharov. Evgeny Onegin and Pechorin are very similar in character, both of them are from a secular environment, received a good upbringing, they are at a higher stage of development, hence their melancholy, melancholy and dissatisfaction. All this is characteristic of souls that are more subtle and more developed. Pushkin writes about Onegin: “Handra was waiting for him on guard, and she ran after him like a shadow or a faithful wife.” The secular society in which Onegin and later Pechorin moved spoiled them. It did not require knowledge, superficial education was enough, knowledge was more important French And good manners. Evgeniy, like everyone else, “danced the mazurka easily and bowed at ease.” Their best years he spends, like most people in his circle, on balls, theaters and love interests. Pechorin leads the same lifestyle. Very soon, both begin to understand that this life is empty, that behind the “external tinsel” there is nothing worth it, boredom, slander, envy reign in the world, people waste the inner strength of the soul on gossip and anger. Petty vanity, empty conversations of “necessary fools”, spiritual emptiness make the life of these people monotonous, outwardly dazzling, but devoid of internal “content.” Idleness and lack of high interests vulgarize their existence. Day is like a day, there is no need to work, there are few impressions, therefore the smartest and the best ones fall ill with nostalgia. They essentially do not know their homeland and people. Onegin “wanted to write, but he was sick of hard work...”, he also did not find the answer to his questions. , but the lack of need for work is the reason that he does not find something to his liking. This is what he suffers from, realizing that the upper layer of society lives off the slave labor of serfs. Serfdom it was a shame Tsarist Russia. In the village, Onegin tried to alleviate the situation of his serfs ("...he replaced the old corvée with a light quitrent..."), for which he was condemned by his neighbors, who considered him an eccentric and a dangerous "freethinker." Many people also do not understand Pechorin. In order to further reveal the character of his hero, Lermontov places him in a variety of social spheres, encounters a wide variety of people. When a separate edition of “A Hero of Our Time” was published, it became clear that before Lermontov the Russian realistic novel did not have. Belinsky pointed out that “Princess Mary” is one of the main stories in the novel. In this story, Pechorin talks about himself, reveals his soul. Here the features of “A Hero of Our Time” were most clearly manifested as psychological novel. In Pechorin's diary we find his sincere confession, in which he reveals his thoughts and feelings, mercilessly castigating his inherent weaknesses and vices: Here is a clue to his character and an explanation of his actions. Pechorin is a victim of his difficult times. Pechorin's character is complex and contradictory. He talks about himself; "There are two people in me: one lives in in every sense of this word, - another thinks and judges him." In the image of Pechorin, the character traits of the author himself are visible, but Lermontov was broader and deeper than his hero. Pechorin is closely associated with advanced social thought, but he considers himself among the pitiful descendants who wander the earth without convictions and pride. “We are not capable of greater sacrifices either for the good of humanity or for our own happiness,” says Pechorin. He lost faith in people, his lack of faith in ideas, skepticism and undoubted selfishness are the result of the era that came after December 14. , era of moral decay, cowardice and vulgarity of that secular society, in which Pechorin revolved. The main task that Lermontov set for himself was to sketch the image of a contemporary young man. Lermontov poses the problem strong personality, so unlike the noble society of the 30s.

Belinsky wrote that “Pechorin is the Onegin of our time.” The novel “A Hero of Our Time” is a bitter reflection on the “history of the human soul,” a soul destroyed by the “brilliance of the deceptive capital,” seeking and not finding friendship, love, and happiness. Pechorin is a suffering egoist. Belinsky wrote about Onegin: “The power of this rich nature were left without application: life without meaning, and the novel without end." The same can be said about Pechorin. Comparing the two heroes, he wrote: "... There is a difference in the roads, but the result is the same." Despite all the difference appearance and differences in characters and Onegin; both Pechorin and Chatsky belong to the gallery of “superfluous people for whom there was neither place nor work in the surrounding society. The desire to find one’s place in life, to understand the “great purpose” is the main meaning of the novel of Lermontov’s lyrics. Isn’t it these thoughts that occupy Pechorin , lead him to a painful answer to the question: “Why did I live?” This question can be answered with the words of Lermontov: “Perhaps, with heavenly thought and the power of spirit, I am convinced that I would give the world a wonderful gift, and for that it would give me immortality... "In Lermontov's lyrics and Pechorin's thoughts we encounter a sad recognition that people are skinny fruits, ripened before their time. How Pechorin's words that he despises life and Lermontov's words, “but I despise fate and the world,” echo in “A Hero of Our Time” we so clearly hear the voice of the poet, the breath of his time. Did Pushkin and Lermontov depict the fates of their heroes, typical of their generation, protest against the reality that forces people to waste their energy.

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ONEGIN AND PECHORIN

From the second half of the 19th century century, primarily thanks to fiction, the concept of “superfluous person” comes into use (this term was first used by A.S. Pushkin in one of his rough sketches for “Onegin”), a whole series of works of art, whose heroes are united special status given to them in society - “superfluous people” who were critical of the established order and their role in the social order, but they did not accept public opinion. Onegin, Pechorin, Beltov, Rudin - these are far from full list characters considered by critics to be “superfluous people.” At the same time, criticism clearly distinguishes the individual traits of these heroes.

Comparing Pechorin with Onegin, Chernyshevsky wrote: “Pechorin is a man of a completely different character and a different degree of development. He has a really strong soul, longing for old age; His will is really strong, capable of energetic activity, but he takes care of himself.” Herzen paid great attention to the problem of “superfluous people”: “The Onegins and Pechorins were completely true, they expressed the real sorrow and fragmentation of the Russian life of that time. The sad fate of excess, lost person appeared then not only in poems and novels, but on the streets and in living rooms, in villages and cities.”

In Lermontov's work, the image of Pechorin was not accidental. The theme of the “superfluous person” can be traced in the poet’s lyrics. Almost simultaneously with Pushkin, Lermontov in the dramas “People and Passions”, “Strange Man”, and then in “Two Brothers”, trying to connect his hero with the real Russian reality surrounding him, comes to disappointing conclusions. Thus, Yu. Volin is shown as a young man who went through a sad path of disappointment and turned into a “strange” person who had lost faith. He says about himself to a friend: “The one who is in front of you is one shadow; a half-dead man, almost without a present and without a future.” Pechorin also characterizes himself as a “half-dead” person, one part of whose soul is buried forever: “I became moral cripple: one half of my soul did not exist, it dried up, evaporated, died, I cut it off and threw it away.”

Taking into account the fact that the literature of that time was a reflection of reality, thoughts and orders prevailing in society, the main means of forming public opinion (in our time, these functions are performed by television, radio, and print media), it should be noted: the problem of “extra people” in the 20s The 40s of the 19th century were really tense. After all, both Onegin and Pechorin embodied a whole generation of young people - gifted, thoughtful, thirsty for activity, but forced to remain inactive. Belinsky also drew attention to the parallelism of the sound and meaning of the surnames Onegin and Pechorin: “Lermontov’s Pechorin... is the Onegin of our time, the hero of our time. Their dissimilarity with each other is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora... In the very name that a true poet gives to his hero, there is a reasonable necessity, although perhaps not visible to the poet himself.” It can be assumed that with the name of Pechorin, Lermontov emphasized the spiritual kinship of his hero with Onegin, but Pechorin is a man of the next decade. So, the heroes are united by their alienation from society, lack of perception of the orders and laws accepted in it, boredom from the pleasures that can be obtained for money, the desire for sincere, open relationships and disbelief in the prospect of friendship, love, and marriage.

The dissimilarity between Onegin and Pechorin is determined not so much by the time period of their lives, but by the differences in their characters. No wonder Dobrolyubov wrote: “...We could not help but see the difference in temperament, for example, in Pechorin and Oblomov, just as we cannot help but find it in Pechorin and Onegin... It is very likely that under other living conditions, in a different society, Onegin was If only truly good fellows, Pechorin and Rudin would have accomplished great feats.”

Pechorin is energy, active, purposeful, although, perhaps, the last definition is somewhat exaggerated. Indeed, Pechorin is ready, firstly, to create difficulties and obstacles for himself, and secondly, to successfully overcome them. But at the same time, he does not have a certain general goal that would give meaning to his earthly existence: “I run through my entire past in my memory and involuntarily ask myself: why did I live? For what purpose was I born? And, it’s true, it existed, and, it’s true, I had a high purpose, because I feel immense strength in my soul...”

Pechorin admits that he did not guess this appointment, exchanging it for empty passions, and regrets that he “played the role of an ax in the hands of fate.” His love did not bring happiness to anyone, because he did not sacrifice anything for those he loved. After all, Pechorin loved for his own pleasure: “... I only satisfied the strange need of my heart, greedily absorbing their feelings, their tenderness, their joys and sufferings - and I could never get enough.”

In contrast to Pechorin, Onegin finds pleasure in complete inaction, self-removal from everyone life problems and passions:

...his feelings cooled down early;

He was tired of the noise of the world;

The beauties didn't last long

The subject of his usual thoughts;

The betrayals have become tiresome;

I'm tired of friends and friendship...

Beauties from high society with their false smiles and empty words disgusted Onegin. But the love of innocent, sincere Tatyana also leaves him indifferent (so Pechorin gradually becomes disillusioned with his love for Bela). Rejecting the girl’s love, he refers to his fear of marriage (just like Pechorin):

Believe me (conscience is a guarantee),

Marriage will be torment for us.

No matter how much I love you,

Once I get used to it, I’ll stop loving it immediately.

The heroes are also united by a passion for travel, constant movement around the world - away from the hateful world, towards new sensations (as we know, Pushkin released an entire chapter from his novel in which Onegin’s journey was described).

It is interesting that both Pushkin and Lermontov place contrasting figures next to the main characters - Lensky and Grushnitsky, respectively. The contrast between Onegin and Lensky, Pechorin and Grushnitsky, at first glance, seems insignificant. They live, apparently, in the circle of the same interests, they feel like people of the same generation, the same cultural environment. In fact, their apparent closeness is an imaginary closeness: a real - psychological, cultural, social - abyss is soon revealed between them.

Grushnitsky is an enthusiastic, but somewhat down-to-earth young man. He is used to producing an effect (the cadet's overcoat, so similar to the soldier's, pretentious phrases, etc.). Lensky is an enthusiastic romantic and poet. With all his ironic attitude towards Lensky, Pushkin noted his education, wide circle intellectual interests, his heated debates on philosophical themes with Onegin. However, the usual path of enthusiastic romantics in Russia is to become ordinary: “In old age, they become either peaceful landowners or drunkards, sometimes both.” These are the words of Lermontov; Pushkin also thought about a similar life path for Lensky:

He would change in many ways

I would part with the muses, get married,

The village is happy and horny

I would wear a quilted robe.

Meanwhile life path these romantics were interrupted by “superfluous people” - Onegin and Pechorin. Each of the heroes perceives the upcoming duel in his own way: Onegin regrets that “that he played such a careless joke on timid, tender love in the evening.” And what public opinion forces him to make the final decision about the duel.

Pechorin also thought for a long time about his irresistible desire to punish the insolent Grushnitsky, but, in the end, he convinces himself that he is right: “Mr. Grushnitsky! You will not succeed in your hoax... We will switch roles: now I will have to look for signs of secret fear on your pale face.”

What unites the heroes is that until the end of their days they never found either peace or that higher purpose that their minds whispered to them. Their lives can serve good example how not to live. In my opinion, it was not the social structure that caused the heroes’ mental tribulations: only their own efforts would have helped them get out of the state of conflict with environment. We agree that it is difficult to witness the moral squalor of others, but Onegin and Pechorin, before diagnosing the entire society, had to sort out the inner content of their own soul and mind.

(No Ratings Yet)

  1. It is difficult not to notice the similarities between Onegin and Pechorin, just as it is impossible to ignore the differences in their characters. Both of them are “superfluous people” of their time. Also V. G. Belinsky, comparing...
  2. I look sadly at our generation! Its future is either empty or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge and doubt, It will grow old in inaction. M. Yu. Lermontov “Eugene Onegin” by Pushkin...
  3. The images of Pechorin and Onegin are similar not only in semantic similarity. V. G. Belinsky noted the spiritual kinship of Onegin and Pechorin: “Their dissimilarity is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora... Pechorin...
  4. Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov are the heroes of one of the best novels Dostoevsky “Crime and Punishment”. This novel is distinguished by its deepest psychologism and abundance of sharp contrasts. At first glance, in the characters of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov...
  5. CLASSICS M.YU. LERMONTOV THE SECRET OF THE HISTORY OF PECHORIN’S SOUL The history of the human soul, even the smallest one, is almost more curious and not more useful than history a whole people. M. Yu. Lermontov Critics wrote:...
  6. Asset medieval culture is knightly poetry. Initially, it described the great exploits of the knights, their victories, and how devoted they were to their overlord, as, for example, in “The Song of Roland.” Later, they sing...
  7. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF OSTAP AND ANDRIY (based on the story “Taras Bulba” by N.V. Gogol) 1st version N.V. Gogol’s story “Taras Bulba” is an epic story about the glorious heroic past of the Ukrainian Cossacks, their...
  8. The life story of Pechorin, the main character of the novel by M. Yu. Lermontov, reflects the fate of a generation of young people of the 30s of the 19th century. According to Lermontov himself, Pechorin is the image of his contemporary...
  9. “Fathers and Sons” is one of eternal books Russian literature. Controversy does not subside around it, and, obviously, not only because the new generation of readers perceives the author’s complex position differently, but...
  10. “War and Peace” – Russian national epic, which reflected the character of a great people at the moment when its historical destinies were being decided. Tolstoy, trying to embrace everything he knew...
  11. Another important thing for understanding the problems of the work is the Image of Maxim Maksimovich. This is not a young, experienced staff captain: “He looked about 50 years old, dark face his long-standing acquaintance with...
  12. For me, “A Hero of Our Time” is a novel that does not belong to instructive and edifying literature. What interested me was precisely the fact that the author asks philosophical questions, but does not answer them...
  13. Love in the life of Pechorin (based on the novel by M. Yu. Lermontov “Hero of Our Time”) Plan I. Pechorin is a hero of his time. II. Love in the life of Pechorin. 1. Bela. 2. Princess Mary. 3....
  14. So who is he – the main character of Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time”? This is an extraordinary and at the same time ambiguous personality, and what immediately catches the eye are the features inherent in the Byronic hero:...
  15. I look sadly at our generation! Its future is either empty or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge and doubt, It will grow old in inaction. M. Yu. Lermontov The epigraph includes...
  16. Cruel time does cruel people. Proof of this - main character Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time” by Grigory Pechorin, in which the author reproduced, in his words, “a portrait, but not of one person: this...
  17. CLASSICS A. S. PUSHKIN “A STRANGER FOR EVERYONE...” (Image of Eugene Onegin) A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” is an unusual work. There are few events in it, many deviations from storyline, the story seems...
  18. The letters of Tatiana and Onegin stand out sharply from the general text Pushkin's novel in poetry, help to better understand the characters, and even the author himself singles out these two letters: attentive reader You will immediately notice that...
  19. After Russia's victory in Patriotic War 1812, during which the Russian nation experienced an extraordinary rise in patriotic self-awareness, the unity of all segments of the people under the banner of the liberation of the Motherland, a period began in the country...
  20. Pechorin - Onegin of our time. V. G. Belinsky Pushkin and Lermontov are people different destinies And different eras. Pushkin is only fifteen years older than Lermontov, a period that would seem short, but...
  21. Typology of essay topics I. Analytical topics Within this broad group, it is appropriate to identify a number of subgroups. First of all, it’s worth talking about the themes-characteristics. There are essays characterizing one character (for example, “The Tragedy of Pechorin” or...
  22. Cross-cutting themes Duel in Russian literature of the 19th century What is a duel? This is a duel during which opponents defend their honor or stand up for the honor of another person. Honor is moral dignity...
  23. Tatyana Larina is Pushkin’s favorite heroine, the author’s “sweet ideal,” an image so significant in the novel that, of course, those who believe that the novel should have been named after her are largely right. Pushkinskaya Tatiana...
  24. Cross-cutting themes “Life is boring without a moral goal...” (F. M. Dostoevsky). (Based on the works of A. S. Pushkin, M. Yu. Lermontov, F. M. Dostoevsky) If we consider Russian classical literature of the 19th century century, then in...
  25. Franz Kafka's novella “Reincarnation” is filled with unexpected plot, interesting twists and big ideas from the author himself. If you look closely at the main character, he is somewhat similar to Franz Kafka himself. By the way, most writers...
  26. The artistic fate of the poet is unusual: this is the fate of the last Russian romantic, who worked in the era of the triumph of realism and yet remained faithful to the precepts of romantic art. Tyutchev's romanticism is manifested primarily in the depiction of nature. Predominance...
COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ONEGIN AND PECHORIN